Understanding the public knowledge, attitude, and practice toward screening and risk factors of lung cancer in Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional study.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Annals of Thoracic Medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-03 DOI:10.4103/atm.atm_111_24
Sadin Ayman Alamri, Manal Mutlaq Alzahrani, Aseel Ayman Alamri, Waad Waleed Khalifa, Ruba Yosof Alsulami, Jameel Bardesi, Wed Salah, Abeer F Zakariyah
{"title":"Understanding the public knowledge, attitude, and practice toward screening and risk factors of lung cancer in Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional study.","authors":"Sadin Ayman Alamri, Manal Mutlaq Alzahrani, Aseel Ayman Alamri, Waad Waleed Khalifa, Ruba Yosof Alsulami, Jameel Bardesi, Wed Salah, Abeer F Zakariyah","doi":"10.4103/atm.atm_111_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Early detection of lung cancer through screening can improve outcomes; yet public knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding lung cancer screening in Saudi Arabia are limited.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim is to assess knowledge, attitudes, and practices toward lung cancer risk factors and screening, and understand the impact of demographic factors on these variables.</p><p><strong>Settings and design: </strong>An observational cross-sectional study was conducted from October 2023 to March 2024, involving 708 participants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A validated questionnaire from a previous Malaysian study, translated into Arabic, was distributed to participants.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis used: </strong>Descriptive statistics, Shapiro-Wilk test, one-way analysis of variance, Tukey's test, and logistic regression were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most participants (95.9%) recognized smoking as a major risk factor. Common misconceptions included viewing lung cancer as infectious (84.0%) or affecting only men (14.4%). Nonetheless, 66.4% expressed willingness for future screening. Younger participants (18-40 years) and those with higher education demonstrated better knowledge scores (mean score: 11.33 ± 2.97 for ages 18-40; 11.42 ± 2.88 for those with master's or doctorate degrees), with significant differences based on age (<i>P</i> = 0.007) and education level (<i>P</i> = 0.025). No significant differences were observed based on gender, region of residence, or monthly family income.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is a positive inclination toward lung cancer screening among the Saudi public, but there are significant knowledge gaps, particularly regarding nonsmoking-related risk factors and misconceptions, suggesting a need for enhanced public education and screening programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":50760,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Thoracic Medicine","volume":"19 4","pages":"275-283"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11559701/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Thoracic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/atm.atm_111_24","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Early detection of lung cancer through screening can improve outcomes; yet public knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding lung cancer screening in Saudi Arabia are limited.

Aims: The aim is to assess knowledge, attitudes, and practices toward lung cancer risk factors and screening, and understand the impact of demographic factors on these variables.

Settings and design: An observational cross-sectional study was conducted from October 2023 to March 2024, involving 708 participants.

Methods: A validated questionnaire from a previous Malaysian study, translated into Arabic, was distributed to participants.

Statistical analysis used: Descriptive statistics, Shapiro-Wilk test, one-way analysis of variance, Tukey's test, and logistic regression were used.

Results: Most participants (95.9%) recognized smoking as a major risk factor. Common misconceptions included viewing lung cancer as infectious (84.0%) or affecting only men (14.4%). Nonetheless, 66.4% expressed willingness for future screening. Younger participants (18-40 years) and those with higher education demonstrated better knowledge scores (mean score: 11.33 ± 2.97 for ages 18-40; 11.42 ± 2.88 for those with master's or doctorate degrees), with significant differences based on age (P = 0.007) and education level (P = 0.025). No significant differences were observed based on gender, region of residence, or monthly family income.

Conclusions: There is a positive inclination toward lung cancer screening among the Saudi public, but there are significant knowledge gaps, particularly regarding nonsmoking-related risk factors and misconceptions, suggesting a need for enhanced public education and screening programs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
了解沙特阿拉伯公众对肺癌筛查和风险因素的认识、态度和做法:横断面研究。
背景:通过筛查及早发现肺癌可以改善预后;然而,沙特阿拉伯公众对肺癌筛查的了解、态度和做法都很有限。目的:本研究旨在评估公众对肺癌风险因素和筛查的了解、态度和做法,并了解人口统计因素对这些变量的影响:一项观察性横断面研究于 2023 年 10 月至 2024 年 3 月进行,共有 708 人参与:方法:向参与者分发了一份经过验证的调查问卷,该问卷来自之前的一项马来西亚研究,并被翻译成阿拉伯语:使用了描述性统计、Shapiro-Wilk 检验、单因素方差分析、Tukey's 检验和逻辑回归:大多数参与者(95.9%)认为吸烟是一个主要风险因素。常见的误解包括将肺癌视为传染性疾病(84.0%)或只影响男性(14.4%)。尽管如此,66.4%的人表示愿意接受未来的筛查。年轻参与者(18-40 岁)和受教育程度较高者的知识得分更高(平均得分:18-40 岁为 11.33 ± 2.97;硕士或博士学位者为 11.42 ± 2.88),年龄(P = 0.007)和受教育程度(P = 0.025)差异显著。性别、居住地区或家庭月收入无明显差异:结论:沙特公众对肺癌筛查有积极的倾向,但存在很大的知识差距,尤其是与非吸烟相关的风险因素和误解,这表明需要加强公众教育和筛查计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Thoracic Medicine
Annals of Thoracic Medicine CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal will cover studies related to multidisciplinary specialties of chest medicine, such as adult and pediatrics pulmonology, thoracic surgery, critical care medicine, respiratory care, transplantation, sleep medicine, related basic medical sciences, and more. The journal also features basic science, special reports, case reports, board review , and more. Editorials and communications to the editor that explore controversial issues and encourage further discussion by physicians dealing with chest medicine.
期刊最新文献
Effect of surgery on survival of patients with small-cell lung cancer undiagnosed before resection. Investigating the dynamic relationship of sleep-disordered breathing, orthodontic treatment needs, and dental esthetics in the general population. Is chest tube omission safe for patients with primary spontaneous pneumothorax scheduled for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery? Sleep disorders among elderly in Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional study. To assess the differences between thymoma patients with/without myasthenia all of their characteristics must be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1