Impact Assessment of Systemic Geometric Distortion in 1.5T Magnetic Resonance Imaging Simulation through Three-dimensional Geometric Distortion Phantom on Dosimetric Accuracy for Magnetic Resonance Imaging-only Prostate Treatment Planning.

IF 0.7 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Journal of Medical Physics Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-21 DOI:10.4103/jmp.jmp_62_24
Korawig Chaknam, Ladawan Worapruekjaru, Sithiphong Suphaphong, Nualjun Stansook, Prapa Sodkokkruad, Sawwanee Asavaphatiboon
{"title":"Impact Assessment of Systemic Geometric Distortion in 1.5T Magnetic Resonance Imaging Simulation through Three-dimensional Geometric Distortion Phantom on Dosimetric Accuracy for Magnetic Resonance Imaging-only Prostate Treatment Planning.","authors":"Korawig Chaknam, Ladawan Worapruekjaru, Sithiphong Suphaphong, Nualjun Stansook, Prapa Sodkokkruad, Sawwanee Asavaphatiboon","doi":"10.4103/jmp.jmp_62_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-only radiotherapy has emerged as a solution to address registration errors that can lead to missed dose delivery. However, the presence of systemic geometric distortion (SGD) stemming from gradient nonlinearity (GNL) and inhomogeneity of the main magnetic field (B<sub>0</sub>) necessitates consideration. This study aimed to quantitatively assess residual SGD in 1.5T MRI simulation using a three-dimensional (3D) geometric distortion phantom and evaluate its impact on dosimetric accuracy for retrospective prostate cancer patients.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Ten retrospective cases of prostate cancer patients treated with volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy (VMAT) were randomly selected. A geometric distortion phantom was scanned on a 1.5T MRI simulation using a 3D T1 volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination sequence, varying bandwidth (BW), and two-phase-encoding directions. Distortion maps were generated and applied to the original computed tomography (oriCT) plan to create a distorted computed tomography plan (dCT), and a dice similarity coefficient (DSC) was observed. Dosimetric accuracy was evaluated by recalculating radiation dose for dCT plans using identical beam parameters as oriCT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The SGD increased with distance from the isocenter in all series. DSC exceeded 0.95 for all plans except the rectum. Regarding GNL's impact on dosimetric accuracy, most mean percentage errors for clinical target volume, planning target volume, and both femurs were under 2% in all plans, except for the bladder and rectum.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SGD pre-evaluation is crucial and should be incorporated into a quality assurance program to ensure effective MRI-simulation performance before MRI-only treatment planning for prostate cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":51719,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Physics","volume":"49 3","pages":"356-362"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11548076/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmp.jmp_62_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-only radiotherapy has emerged as a solution to address registration errors that can lead to missed dose delivery. However, the presence of systemic geometric distortion (SGD) stemming from gradient nonlinearity (GNL) and inhomogeneity of the main magnetic field (B0) necessitates consideration. This study aimed to quantitatively assess residual SGD in 1.5T MRI simulation using a three-dimensional (3D) geometric distortion phantom and evaluate its impact on dosimetric accuracy for retrospective prostate cancer patients.

Materials and methods: Ten retrospective cases of prostate cancer patients treated with volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy (VMAT) were randomly selected. A geometric distortion phantom was scanned on a 1.5T MRI simulation using a 3D T1 volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination sequence, varying bandwidth (BW), and two-phase-encoding directions. Distortion maps were generated and applied to the original computed tomography (oriCT) plan to create a distorted computed tomography plan (dCT), and a dice similarity coefficient (DSC) was observed. Dosimetric accuracy was evaluated by recalculating radiation dose for dCT plans using identical beam parameters as oriCT.

Results: The SGD increased with distance from the isocenter in all series. DSC exceeded 0.95 for all plans except the rectum. Regarding GNL's impact on dosimetric accuracy, most mean percentage errors for clinical target volume, planning target volume, and both femurs were under 2% in all plans, except for the bladder and rectum.

Conclusion: SGD pre-evaluation is crucial and should be incorporated into a quality assurance program to ensure effective MRI-simulation performance before MRI-only treatment planning for prostate cancer.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过三维几何畸变模型评估 1.5T 磁共振成像模拟中的系统几何畸变对单纯磁共振成像前列腺治疗规划剂量测定精度的影响。
目的:单纯磁共振成像(MRI)放射治疗已成为一种解决方案,可解决可能导致错过剂量投放的配准错误。然而,由于梯度非线性(GNL)和主磁场(B0)的不均匀性而产生的系统性几何失真(SGD)的存在需要加以考虑。本研究旨在使用三维(3D)几何畸变模型对 1.5T 磁共振成像模拟中的残余 SGD 进行定量评估,并评估其对回顾性前列腺癌患者剂量测定准确性的影响:随机选取十例采用容积调制弧线放疗(VMAT)治疗的前列腺癌患者。使用三维 T1 容积插值屏气检查序列、不同带宽(BW)和双相位编码方向,在 1.5T 磁共振成像模拟上扫描几何畸变模型。生成畸变图并应用于原始计算机断层扫描(oriCT)计划,以创建畸变计算机断层扫描计划(dCT),并观察骰子相似系数(DSC)。通过使用与 oriCT 相同的射束参数重新计算 dCT 图的辐射剂量,对剂量测定的准确性进行了评估:结果:在所有系列中,SGD随距等中心的距离增加而增加。除直肠外,所有计划的 DSC 均超过 0.95。关于 GNL 对剂量测定准确性的影响,除膀胱和直肠外,所有计划中临床靶体积、计划靶体积和双侧股骨的平均百分比误差大多低于 2%:结论:SGD 预评估至关重要,应纳入质量保证计划中,以确保在前列腺癌的纯核磁共振治疗计划前有效提高核磁共振模拟性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Physics
Journal of Medical Physics RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
55
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS is the official journal of Association of Medical Physicists of India (AMPI). The association has been bringing out a quarterly publication since 1976. Till the end of 1993, it was known as Medical Physics Bulletin, which then became Journal of Medical Physics. The main objective of the Journal is to serve as a vehicle of communication to highlight all aspects of the practice of medical radiation physics. The areas covered include all aspects of the application of radiation physics to biological sciences, radiotherapy, radiodiagnosis, nuclear medicine, dosimetry and radiation protection. Papers / manuscripts dealing with the aspects of physics related to cancer therapy / radiobiology also fall within the scope of the journal.
期刊最新文献
A Segmentation-based Automated Calculation of Patient Size and Size-specific Dose Estimates in Pediatric Computed Tomography Scans. A Study on Radiation Level at the Treatment Plane Due to Induced Activity in Linear Accelerator Head. Advancements and Applications of Three-dimensional Printing Technology in Surgery. Agar-based Phantom for Evaluating Targeting of High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Systems for Breast Ablation. An Analysis of Radiotherapy Machine Requirements in India: Impact of the Pandemic and Regional Disparities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1