The First Step in Triadic Decision-Making Involving People with Dementia: Determining Who Talks When.

IF 3 1区 文学 Q1 COMMUNICATION Research on Language and Social Interaction Pub Date : 2024-11-06 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1080/08351813.2024.2410132
I L Windeatt-Harrison, T Walker, S M Bell, D Blackburn, J M Dickson, S Jones, A Wardrope, M Reuber
{"title":"The First Step in Triadic Decision-Making Involving People with Dementia: Determining Who Talks When.","authors":"I L Windeatt-Harrison, T Walker, S M Bell, D Blackburn, J M Dickson, S Jones, A Wardrope, M Reuber","doi":"10.1080/08351813.2024.2410132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Everyone should have the opportunity to participate in decisions about their health, including people living with dementia. People with dementia typically bring a companion to medical appointments, so most care decisions are made in interactions involving three parties. To make decisions about their care, patients with dementia must have the opportunity to take a turn-at-talk in conversations where decisions are made. However, negotiating who speaks next in triadic talk is a complex task, especially when dementia-associated language and/or memory problems impact communication. Findings show that using second person (\"you\") pronouns assist people with dementia in responding to queries, yet third person (\"she/he\") can exclude them from the interaction, although this near-canonical pronoun use can be overridden by sequential placement, gesture, and gaze. We also demonstrate how midturn pronoun switching often only provides for tokenistic inclusion, though this again is dependent on sequential placement and embodied interaction. Data are in English.</p>","PeriodicalId":51484,"journal":{"name":"Research on Language and Social Interaction","volume":"57 4","pages":"399-416"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11552697/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research on Language and Social Interaction","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2024.2410132","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Everyone should have the opportunity to participate in decisions about their health, including people living with dementia. People with dementia typically bring a companion to medical appointments, so most care decisions are made in interactions involving three parties. To make decisions about their care, patients with dementia must have the opportunity to take a turn-at-talk in conversations where decisions are made. However, negotiating who speaks next in triadic talk is a complex task, especially when dementia-associated language and/or memory problems impact communication. Findings show that using second person ("you") pronouns assist people with dementia in responding to queries, yet third person ("she/he") can exclude them from the interaction, although this near-canonical pronoun use can be overridden by sequential placement, gesture, and gaze. We also demonstrate how midturn pronoun switching often only provides for tokenistic inclusion, though this again is dependent on sequential placement and embodied interaction. Data are in English.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
痴呆症患者参与三方决策的第一步:确定谁在何时发言。
每个人都应该有机会参与有关自身健康的决策,包括痴呆症患者。痴呆症患者看病时通常会带一名陪伴者,因此大多数护理决策都是在三方互动的过程中做出的。为了对自己的护理做出决定,痴呆症患者必须有机会在做出决定的对话中轮流发言。然而,在三方对话中协商下一个发言的人是一项复杂的任务,尤其是当痴呆症相关的语言和/或记忆问题影响到交流时。研究结果表明,使用第二人称("您")代词有助于痴呆症患者回答询问,而第三人称("她/他")则会将他们排除在互动之外,尽管这种近乎规范的代词使用可以被顺序位置、手势和目光所取代。我们还展示了中途切换代词如何往往只能提供象征性的包容,尽管这同样取决于顺序位置和体现性互动。数据使用英语。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
7.40%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: The journal publishes the highest quality empirical and theoretical research bearing on language as it is used in interaction. Researchers in communication, discourse analysis, conversation analysis, linguistic anthropology and ethnography are likely to be the most active contributors, but we welcome submission of articles from the broad range of interaction researchers. Published papers will normally involve the close analysis of naturally-occurring interaction. The journal is also open to theoretical essays, and to quantitative studies where these are tied closely to the results of naturalistic observation.
期刊最新文献
The First Step in Triadic Decision-Making Involving People with Dementia: Determining Who Talks When. Gaze in Interspecies Human–Pet Interaction: Some Exploratory Analyses Thanks to Reviewers Cries of Pleasure and Pain: Vocalizations Communicating How Touch Feels in Romantic Relationships Including Written Turns in Spoken Interaction: Chat as an Organizational and Participatory Resource in Video-Mediated Activities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1