Feasibility, acceptability and efficacy of a pilot exercise physiology group service for older people with type 2 diabetes.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Australian Journal of General Practice Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.31128/AJGP-08-23-6946
Kelly A McLeod, Jeanette M Thom, Matthew D Jones, Belinda J Parmenter
{"title":"Feasibility, acceptability and efficacy of a pilot exercise physiology group service for older people with type 2 diabetes.","authors":"Kelly A McLeod, Jeanette M Thom, Matthew D Jones, Belinda J Parmenter","doi":"10.31128/AJGP-08-23-6946","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Type 2 diabetes affects over half a million older Australians. Australian Medicare group exercise and education interventions can support older adults' diabetes management. However, the feasibility and acceptability of accredited exercise physiologist (AEP)-delivered services are yet to be assessed. This study aimed to assess the feasibility, acceptability and preliminary efficacy of a Medicare type 2 diabetes group exercise and education intervention for older adults.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This study was a single-arm feasibility, acceptability and preliminary efficacy trial of an AEP-delivered type 2 diabetes group service for older adults with the condition. Participants attended the diabetes clinic once per week for eight weeks, through Medicare, for a group exercise and education session. Attendance, participation, enjoyment, suitability, usefulness and pre-post clinical health outcomes were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The intervention was feasible and acceptable, with 40 participants (mean [±standard deviation] age 71.8±4.5 years [range 65-81 years]; 45% female) attending 87% of sessions. Almost all participants (97%) strongly agreed that the program was enjoyable. Participants also improved fitness and cardiometabolic health outcomes.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>More Australians should be referred to and attend Medicare-subsidised exercise physiologist-delivered group sessions. The potential for additional sessions to achieve greater physical activity engagement and diabetes self-management should be further investigated.</p>","PeriodicalId":54241,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of General Practice","volume":"53 11 Suppl","pages":"S74-S82"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of General Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31128/AJGP-08-23-6946","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Type 2 diabetes affects over half a million older Australians. Australian Medicare group exercise and education interventions can support older adults' diabetes management. However, the feasibility and acceptability of accredited exercise physiologist (AEP)-delivered services are yet to be assessed. This study aimed to assess the feasibility, acceptability and preliminary efficacy of a Medicare type 2 diabetes group exercise and education intervention for older adults.

Method: This study was a single-arm feasibility, acceptability and preliminary efficacy trial of an AEP-delivered type 2 diabetes group service for older adults with the condition. Participants attended the diabetes clinic once per week for eight weeks, through Medicare, for a group exercise and education session. Attendance, participation, enjoyment, suitability, usefulness and pre-post clinical health outcomes were assessed.

Results: The intervention was feasible and acceptable, with 40 participants (mean [±standard deviation] age 71.8±4.5 years [range 65-81 years]; 45% female) attending 87% of sessions. Almost all participants (97%) strongly agreed that the program was enjoyable. Participants also improved fitness and cardiometabolic health outcomes.

Discussion: More Australians should be referred to and attend Medicare-subsidised exercise physiologist-delivered group sessions. The potential for additional sessions to achieve greater physical activity engagement and diabetes self-management should be further investigated.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为患有 2 型糖尿病的老年人提供运动生理学小组试点服务的可行性、可接受性和有效性。
背景和目标:超过 50 万澳大利亚老年人患有 2 型糖尿病。澳大利亚医疗保险计划(Australian Medicare)的集体运动和教育干预措施可帮助老年人控制糖尿病。然而,认可运动生理学家(AEP)提供的服务的可行性和可接受性还有待评估。本研究旨在评估针对老年人的医疗保险 2 型糖尿病集体运动和教育干预的可行性、可接受性和初步疗效:本研究是一项单臂可行性、可接受性和初步疗效试验,针对患有 2 型糖尿病的老年人开展 AEP 小组服务。参加者通过医疗保险每周到糖尿病诊所参加一次集体运动和教育课程,为期八周。对参与者的出席率、参与度、乐趣、适合度、有用性和事后临床健康结果进行了评估:干预措施可行且可接受,40 名参与者(平均[±标准差]年龄为 71.8±4.5 岁[65-81 岁];45% 为女性)参加了 87% 的课程。几乎所有参与者(97%)都非常同意该计划是令人愉快的。参与者的体能和心脏代谢健康状况也得到了改善:讨论:更多的澳大利亚人应转诊并参加由医疗保险补贴的运动生理学家提供的小组课程。应进一步研究额外课程在提高体育锻炼参与度和糖尿病自我管理方面的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Journal of General Practice
Australian Journal of General Practice Medicine-Family Practice
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
4.50%
发文量
284
期刊介绍: The Australian Journal of General Practice (AJGP) aims to provide relevant, evidence-based, clearly articulated information to Australian general practitioners (GPs) to assist them in providing the highest quality patient care, applicable to the varied geographic and social contexts in which GPs work and to all GP roles as clinician, researcher, educator, practice team member and opinion leader. All articles are subject to peer review before they are accepted for publication.
期刊最新文献
Disaster management. Disaster planning in general practice. General practitioner disaster support for pregnant women, new mothers, infants and young children: Findings from the Babies and Young Children in the Black Summer (BiBS) study. Granular parakeratosis associated with benzalkonium chloride exposure. Guest Editorial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1