Machine learning model for early prediction of survival in gallbladder adenocarcinoma: A comparison study

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS SLAS Technology Pub Date : 2024-11-09 DOI:10.1016/j.slast.2024.100220
Weijia Wang , Xin Li , Haiyuan Yu , Fangxuan Li , Guohua Chen
{"title":"Machine learning model for early prediction of survival in gallbladder adenocarcinoma: A comparison study","authors":"Weijia Wang ,&nbsp;Xin Li ,&nbsp;Haiyuan Yu ,&nbsp;Fangxuan Li ,&nbsp;Guohua Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.slast.2024.100220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The prognosis for gallbladder adenocarcinoma (GBAC), a highly malignant cancer, is not good. In order to facilitate individualized risk stratification and improve clinical decision-making, this study set out to create and validate a machine learning model that could accurately predict early survival outcomes in GBAC patients. Five models—RSF, Cox regression, GBM, XGBoost, and Deepsurv—were compared using data from the SEER database (2010–2020). The dataset was divided into training (70 %) and validation (30 %) sets, and the C-index, ROC curves, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to assess the model's performance. At 1, 2, and 3-year survival intervals, the RSF model performed better than the others in terms of calibration, discrimination, and clinical net benefit. The most important predictor of survival, according to SHAP analysis, is AJCC stage. Patients were divided into high, medium, and low-risk groups according to RSF-derived risk scores, which revealed notable variations in survival results. These results demonstrate the RSF model's potential as an early survival prediction tool for GBAC patients, which could enhance individualized treatment and decision-making.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54248,"journal":{"name":"SLAS Technology","volume":"29 6","pages":"Article 100220"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SLAS Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S247263032400102X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The prognosis for gallbladder adenocarcinoma (GBAC), a highly malignant cancer, is not good. In order to facilitate individualized risk stratification and improve clinical decision-making, this study set out to create and validate a machine learning model that could accurately predict early survival outcomes in GBAC patients. Five models—RSF, Cox regression, GBM, XGBoost, and Deepsurv—were compared using data from the SEER database (2010–2020). The dataset was divided into training (70 %) and validation (30 %) sets, and the C-index, ROC curves, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to assess the model's performance. At 1, 2, and 3-year survival intervals, the RSF model performed better than the others in terms of calibration, discrimination, and clinical net benefit. The most important predictor of survival, according to SHAP analysis, is AJCC stage. Patients were divided into high, medium, and low-risk groups according to RSF-derived risk scores, which revealed notable variations in survival results. These results demonstrate the RSF model's potential as an early survival prediction tool for GBAC patients, which could enhance individualized treatment and decision-making.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于早期预测胆囊腺癌生存率的机器学习模型:对比研究
胆囊腺癌(GBAC)是一种高度恶性的癌症,其预后并不乐观。为了促进个体化风险分层并改善临床决策,本研究着手创建并验证一种能够准确预测胆囊腺癌患者早期生存结果的机器学习模型。我们使用 SEER 数据库(2010-2020 年)中的数据对五种模型--RSF、Cox 回归、GBM、XGBoost 和 Deepsurv 进行了比较。数据集被分为训练集(70%)和验证集(30%),并使用C指数、ROC曲线、校准曲线和决策曲线分析(DCA)来评估模型的性能。在 1 年、2 年和 3 年的生存间隔中,RSF 模型在校准、辨别和临床净效益方面的表现优于其他模型。根据 SHAP 分析,AJCC 分期是预测生存率的最重要指标。根据 RSF 导出的风险评分,将患者分为高、中、低风险组,结果显示生存率存在显著差异。这些结果表明,RSF 模型具有作为 GBAC 患者早期生存预测工具的潜力,可提高个体化治疗和决策水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
SLAS Technology
SLAS Technology Computer Science-Computer Science Applications
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
7.40%
发文量
47
审稿时长
106 days
期刊介绍: SLAS Technology emphasizes scientific and technical advances that enable and improve life sciences research and development; drug-delivery; diagnostics; biomedical and molecular imaging; and personalized and precision medicine. This includes high-throughput and other laboratory automation technologies; micro/nanotechnologies; analytical, separation and quantitative techniques; synthetic chemistry and biology; informatics (data analysis, statistics, bio, genomic and chemoinformatics); and more.
期刊最新文献
Model-Based Interactive Visualization for Complex Systems Requirements and Design in Joint Tests. Implementing enclosed sterile integrated robotic platforms to improve cell-based screening for drug discovery. Life Sciences Discovery and Technology Highlights. Notes on AEMS methods development for high throughput experimentation in drug discovery. Prosthesis repair of oral implants based on artificial intelligenc`e finite element analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1