Effect of Compressive Strain Rates on Viscoelasticity and Water Content in Intact Porcine Stomach Wall Tissues.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 BIOPHYSICS Journal of Biomechanical Engineering-Transactions of the Asme Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1115/1.4067084
Vijay Shashank Udayamohan, Achu Geetha Byju, Jason L Harris, Balakrishna Haridas
{"title":"Effect of Compressive Strain Rates on Viscoelasticity and Water Content in Intact Porcine Stomach Wall Tissues.","authors":"Vijay Shashank Udayamohan, Achu Geetha Byju, Jason L Harris, Balakrishna Haridas","doi":"10.1115/1.4067084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Laparoscopic staplers are used extensively to seal and transect tissue. These devices compress tissue between the stapler jaws to achieve a desired compressed tissue thickness in preparation for stapling. The extent and rate of compression are dependent on surgeon technique, tissue characteristics, and stapler type, all of which can impact stapling outcomes such as bleeding, staple line leaks, and tissue healing. Historically, surgeons have relied on their experience, training, and tactile feedback from the device to optimize stapling. In recent years, the transition to electromechanical and robotic staplers has greatly impacted the tactile feedback available to the surgeon. This raises new questions about the optimal rates of tissue compression and the resultant tissue forces. This study quantifies the transmural biomechanics of the porcine stomach wall. Multirate indentation tests were used to observe the effects of indentation rate on the viscoelastic behavior of the stomach tissue during indentation, stress relaxation, and unconstrained recovery. Results show that the stomach wall demonstrates higher stress relaxation (88% versus 80%) and greater strain recovery (52% versus 47%) when indented at high rates (37.5%/s) versus slow rates (7.5%/s). Additionally, water content analysis was used to study fluid flow away from indented regions. Unindented regions were found to have greater water content compared to indented regions (78% compared to 75%). This data generated in this study may be used to enable the development of constitutive models of stomach tissue, which in turn may inform the control algorithms that drive compressive surgical devices.</p>","PeriodicalId":54871,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biomechanical Engineering-Transactions of the Asme","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biomechanical Engineering-Transactions of the Asme","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4067084","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Laparoscopic staplers are used extensively to seal and transect tissue. These devices compress tissue between the stapler jaws to achieve a desired compressed tissue thickness in preparation for stapling. The extent and rate of compression are dependent on surgeon technique, tissue characteristics, and stapler type, all of which can impact stapling outcomes such as bleeding, staple line leaks, and tissue healing. Historically, surgeons have relied on their experience, training, and tactile feedback from the device to optimize stapling. In recent years, the transition to electromechanical and robotic staplers has greatly impacted the tactile feedback available to the surgeon. This raises new questions about the optimal rates of tissue compression and the resultant tissue forces. This study quantifies the transmural biomechanics of the porcine stomach wall. Multirate indentation tests were used to observe the effects of indentation rate on the viscoelastic behavior of the stomach tissue during indentation, stress relaxation, and unconstrained recovery. Results show that the stomach wall demonstrates higher stress relaxation (88% versus 80%) and greater strain recovery (52% versus 47%) when indented at high rates (37.5%/s) versus slow rates (7.5%/s). Additionally, water content analysis was used to study fluid flow away from indented regions. Unindented regions were found to have greater water content compared to indented regions (78% compared to 75%). This data generated in this study may be used to enable the development of constitutive models of stomach tissue, which in turn may inform the control algorithms that drive compressive surgical devices.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
压缩应变速率对完整猪胃壁组织粘弹性和含水量的影响
腹腔镜订书机广泛用于密封和横切组织。这些设备在订书机钳口之间压缩组织,以达到所需的压缩组织厚度,为订书机订书做准备。压缩的程度和速度取决于外科医生的技术、组织特征和订书机类型,所有这些都会影响订书结果,如出血、订书机线泄漏和组织愈合。一直以来,外科医生依靠经验、培训和设备的触觉反馈来优化缝合。近年来,向机电和机器人订书机的过渡极大地影响了外科医生的触觉反馈。这就对最佳组织压迫率和由此产生的组织力提出了新的问题。本研究量化了猪胃壁的跨壁生物力学。采用多速率压入试验观察压入速率对胃组织在压入、应力松弛和无约束恢复期间粘弹性行为的影响。结果表明,胃壁在高速压入(37.5%/秒)与慢速压入(7.5%/秒)时,应力松弛率(88% vs 80%)和应变恢复率(52% vs 47%)更高。此外,含水量分析还用于研究流体从压痕区域流出的情况。结果发现,与压痕区域相比,未压痕区域的含水量更高(78% 比 75%)。这项研究产生的数据可用于开发胃组织的构成模型,进而为驱动压缩外科手术设备的控制算法提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
169
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Artificial Organs and Prostheses; Bioinstrumentation and Measurements; Bioheat Transfer; Biomaterials; Biomechanics; Bioprocess Engineering; Cellular Mechanics; Design and Control of Biological Systems; Physiological Systems.
期刊最新文献
Effect of Blade Thickness on Hemodynamics and Hemolysis: A Case Study of Pediatric Centrifugal Blood Pumps. Effect of Compressive Strain Rates on Viscoelasticity and Water Content in Intact Porcine Stomach Wall Tissues. Estimation of Joint Kinetics During Manual Material Handling Using Inertial Motion Capture: A Follow-Up Study. Image-Based Estimation of Left Ventricular Myocardial Stiffness. Phenomenological Muscle Constitutive Model With Actin-Titin Binding for Simulating Active Stretching.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1