Reviewing the landscape of the decision-making process for pain assessment and management for people living with dementia: A systematic review

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Geriatric Nursing Pub Date : 2024-11-14 DOI:10.1016/j.gerinurse.2024.10.047
Lihui PU , Madushika KODAGODA GAMAGE , Na LI , Matthew BARTON , Marlies FEENSTRA , Michael TODOROVIC , Wendy MOYLE
{"title":"Reviewing the landscape of the decision-making process for pain assessment and management for people living with dementia: A systematic review","authors":"Lihui PU ,&nbsp;Madushika KODAGODA GAMAGE ,&nbsp;Na LI ,&nbsp;Matthew BARTON ,&nbsp;Marlies FEENSTRA ,&nbsp;Michael TODOROVIC ,&nbsp;Wendy MOYLE","doi":"10.1016/j.gerinurse.2024.10.047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To understand the steps in the decision-making process regarding pain assessment and management for people living with dementia from the perspectives and experiences of people with dementia, formal and informal carers.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic review was conducted. Seven English databases were searched, including PubMed, Psychological Information Database, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Web of Science, and ProQuest, using synonyms and derivatives for “dementia”, “cognitive impairment”, “pain”, “pain assessment”, “pain management”, “decision”, “decision support”, and “decision-making”.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Twenty-eight studies fulfilled the eligibility criteria. Pain assessment and management in dementia are complex, successive, and collaborative processes carried out by different individuals over a period based on one's understanding of the person with dementia but with high uncertainty. Pain assessment involves a certain degree of guesswork, while pain management is a trial-and-error process.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>More pragmatic approaches are needed to overcome challenges, including uncertainty and decisional conflicts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56258,"journal":{"name":"Geriatric Nursing","volume":"61 ","pages":"Pages 50-63"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geriatric Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0197457224003690","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

To understand the steps in the decision-making process regarding pain assessment and management for people living with dementia from the perspectives and experiences of people with dementia, formal and informal carers.

Methods

A systematic review was conducted. Seven English databases were searched, including PubMed, Psychological Information Database, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Web of Science, and ProQuest, using synonyms and derivatives for “dementia”, “cognitive impairment”, “pain”, “pain assessment”, “pain management”, “decision”, “decision support”, and “decision-making”.

Results

Twenty-eight studies fulfilled the eligibility criteria. Pain assessment and management in dementia are complex, successive, and collaborative processes carried out by different individuals over a period based on one's understanding of the person with dementia but with high uncertainty. Pain assessment involves a certain degree of guesswork, while pain management is a trial-and-error process.

Conclusion

More pragmatic approaches are needed to overcome challenges, including uncertainty and decisional conflicts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
回顾痴呆症患者疼痛评估和管理决策过程:系统综述。
目的:从痴呆症患者、正式和非正式照护者的角度和经验出发,了解痴呆症患者疼痛评估和管理决策过程中的步骤:方法:进行了系统性回顾。使用 "痴呆症"、"认知障碍"、"疼痛"、"疼痛评估"、"疼痛管理"、"决策"、"决策支持 "和 "决策 "的同义词和派生词检索了 7 个英文数据库,包括 PubMed、心理学信息数据库、Cochrane Library、Scopus、Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature、Web of Science 和 ProQuest:结果:28 项研究符合资格标准。痴呆症患者的疼痛评估和管理是一个复杂、连续和协作的过程,由不同的人根据对痴呆症患者的了解在一段时间内共同完成,但具有很大的不确定性。疼痛评估涉及一定程度的猜测,而疼痛管理则是一个反复试验的过程:结论:需要更加务实的方法来克服各种挑战,包括不确定性和决策冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Geriatric Nursing
Geriatric Nursing 医学-护理
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
7.40%
发文量
257
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Geriatric Nursing is a comprehensive source for clinical information and management advice relating to the care of older adults. The journal''s peer-reviewed articles report the latest developments in the management of acute and chronic disorders and provide practical advice on care of older adults across the long term continuum. Geriatric Nursing addresses current issues related to drugs, advance directives, staff development and management, legal issues, client and caregiver education, infection control, and other topics. The journal is written specifically for nurses and nurse practitioners who work with older adults in any care setting.
期刊最新文献
A case study on experiences with integrated technologies in a care home for older adults A psychometric assessment for evaluating spiritual care competency for geriatric nurses A study of the predictive value of different health indicators on the risk of all-cause mortality in older adults living in communities Comparison of the performance of instruments for screening sarcopenia in older adults Falls efficacy scale – Formal caregivers: Adaptation and validation in Portuguese nursing homes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1