Family planning knowledge, use, and associated factors among women with mental illness and epilepsy in Rwanda: a cross-sectional study.

IF 2.3 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Frontiers in global women's health Pub Date : 2024-10-25 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fgwh.2024.1373051
Pacifique Mukangabire, M Providence Umuziga, Benoite Umubyeyi, Donatilla Mukamana, Darius Gishoma, Vedaste Baziga, Philomene Uwimana, Fidele Sebera, Olive Bazirete, Clementine Kanazayire
{"title":"Family planning knowledge, use, and associated factors among women with mental illness and epilepsy in Rwanda: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Pacifique Mukangabire, M Providence Umuziga, Benoite Umubyeyi, Donatilla Mukamana, Darius Gishoma, Vedaste Baziga, Philomene Uwimana, Fidele Sebera, Olive Bazirete, Clementine Kanazayire","doi":"10.3389/fgwh.2024.1373051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Family planning knowledge and access to quality family planning services occupy a central position in the lives of all women of reproductive age. However, women with mental illness and epilepsy who are at a high risk of sexual violence, unwanted pregnancies, poor obstetric outcomes, and drug interaction consequences, need it the most. Understanding their family planning knowledge and utilization remains crucial for meeting their needs. The present study aims to assess knowledge, use of family planning, and associated factors among women living with mental illness and epilepsy who attend the Ndera Neuropsychiatric Hospital and affiliated branches.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted between October 2022 and February 2023. The study involved a purposive sample of 289 women who attended the Ndera Neuropsychiatric Hospital and its two affiliated branches during the data collection period. Psychiatric nurses administered a structured questionnaire. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, and multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the factors associated with the use of family planning methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 289 who participated in the study, the majority (96.9%) were aware of family planning methods, most (67.8%) had used one method once in their life course, a half (51.9%) were using a family planning method at the time of data collection, and a slight number (26%) expressed intentions of using a family planning method in the future. The most known and used methods were respectively the injectable (17.5%) and oral contraceptive pill (17.5%). Regarding the natural family planning methods, breastfeeding and withdrawal were less used. Being single (AOR = 66.4, 95% CI: 9.8, 44) or married (AOR = 51.4, 95% CI: 11.9-22), having a primary level of education (AOR = 5.6, 95% CI: 2.0, 15.9), knowing a contraceptive method (AOR = 5.8, 95% CI: 0.6, 49) and suffering from brief psychotic disorders (AOR = 2.7, 95% CI: 1.1, 6.6) predicted a higher utilization of family planning.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most of the women with mental illness in this study were aware of family planning methods and had used one of the family planning methods in life. The national average is below when it comes to family planning awareness. It is important to improve family planning education and counseling for women who attend psychiatric outpatient clinics.</p>","PeriodicalId":73087,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in global women's health","volume":"5 ","pages":"1373051"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11543584/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in global women's health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fgwh.2024.1373051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Family planning knowledge and access to quality family planning services occupy a central position in the lives of all women of reproductive age. However, women with mental illness and epilepsy who are at a high risk of sexual violence, unwanted pregnancies, poor obstetric outcomes, and drug interaction consequences, need it the most. Understanding their family planning knowledge and utilization remains crucial for meeting their needs. The present study aims to assess knowledge, use of family planning, and associated factors among women living with mental illness and epilepsy who attend the Ndera Neuropsychiatric Hospital and affiliated branches.

Methodology: A cross-sectional study was conducted between October 2022 and February 2023. The study involved a purposive sample of 289 women who attended the Ndera Neuropsychiatric Hospital and its two affiliated branches during the data collection period. Psychiatric nurses administered a structured questionnaire. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, and multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the factors associated with the use of family planning methods.

Results: Out of 289 who participated in the study, the majority (96.9%) were aware of family planning methods, most (67.8%) had used one method once in their life course, a half (51.9%) were using a family planning method at the time of data collection, and a slight number (26%) expressed intentions of using a family planning method in the future. The most known and used methods were respectively the injectable (17.5%) and oral contraceptive pill (17.5%). Regarding the natural family planning methods, breastfeeding and withdrawal were less used. Being single (AOR = 66.4, 95% CI: 9.8, 44) or married (AOR = 51.4, 95% CI: 11.9-22), having a primary level of education (AOR = 5.6, 95% CI: 2.0, 15.9), knowing a contraceptive method (AOR = 5.8, 95% CI: 0.6, 49) and suffering from brief psychotic disorders (AOR = 2.7, 95% CI: 1.1, 6.6) predicted a higher utilization of family planning.

Conclusion: Most of the women with mental illness in this study were aware of family planning methods and had used one of the family planning methods in life. The national average is below when it comes to family planning awareness. It is important to improve family planning education and counseling for women who attend psychiatric outpatient clinics.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
卢旺达患有精神疾病和癫痫的妇女的计划生育知识、使用情况及相关因素:一项横断面研究。
导言:计划生育知识和获得优质计划生育服务在所有育龄妇女的生活中占据着核心地位。然而,患有精神疾病和癫痫的妇女是性暴力、意外怀孕、不良产科结果和药物相互作用后果的高危人群,她们最需要计划生育服务。了解她们的计划生育知识和使用情况对于满足她们的需求仍然至关重要。本研究旨在评估在恩德拉神经精神病医院及其附属分院就诊的精神病和癫痫妇女对计划生育的了解、使用情况及相关因素:在 2022 年 10 月至 2023 年 2 月期间进行了一项横断面研究。研究对象为在数据收集期间在恩德拉神经精神病医院及其两家附属分院就诊的 289 名妇女。精神科护士进行了结构化问卷调查。数据采用描述性统计进行分析,并进行了多元逻辑回归分析,以评估与使用计划生育方法相关的因素:在参与研究的 289 人中,大多数人(96.9%)了解计划生育方法,大多数人(67.8%)在一生中曾使用过一种方法,半数人(51.9%)在收集数据时正在使用计划生育方法,少数人(26%)表示打算在未来使用计划生育方法。已知和使用最多的方法分别是注射避孕药(17.5%)和口服避孕药(17.5%)。在自然计划生育方法中,母乳喂养和体外射精的使用率较低。单身(AOR = 66.4,95% CI:9.8,44)或已婚(AOR = 51.4,95% CI:11.9-22)、初等教育水平(AOR = 5.6,95% CI:2.0,15.9)、了解避孕方法(AOR = 5.8,95% CI:0.6,49)以及患有短暂精神障碍(AOR = 2.7,95% CI:1.1,6.6)都预示着计划生育的使用率较高:结论:在这项研究中,大多数患有精神疾病的妇女都了解计划生育方法,并在生活中使用过其中一种计 划生育方法。在计划生育意识方面,全国平均水平较低。加强对精神病门诊妇女的计划生育教育和咨询非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Insights into perceptions, responses, and challenges experienced by women and girls' survivors of sexual violence and their communities in rural Guinea, 2020. Safe limits on work hours for the nursing profession: a rapid evidence review. An analysis of virtual triage utilization by pregnant women prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic. What factors influence women's empowerment in Ethiopia? A multilevel analysis of Ethiopia's demographic and health survey data. Exploring the acceptability of a decision aid for rural women with a history of prior cesarean birth regarding subsequent mode of birth in Coatepeque, Guatemala.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1