The impact of intimate partner violence on adverse birth outcomes in 20 sub-Saharan African countries: propensity score matching analysis.

IF 2.3 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Frontiers in global women's health Pub Date : 2024-10-28 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fgwh.2024.1420422
Angwach Abrham Asnake, Beminate Lemma Seifu, Alemayehu Kasu Gebrehana, Asaye Alamneh Gebeyehu, Amanuel Yosef Gebrekidan, Afework Alemu Lombebo, Amanuel Alemu Abajobir
{"title":"The impact of intimate partner violence on adverse birth outcomes in 20 sub-Saharan African countries: propensity score matching analysis.","authors":"Angwach Abrham Asnake, Beminate Lemma Seifu, Alemayehu Kasu Gebrehana, Asaye Alamneh Gebeyehu, Amanuel Yosef Gebrekidan, Afework Alemu Lombebo, Amanuel Alemu Abajobir","doi":"10.3389/fgwh.2024.1420422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a significant public health problem, with serious consequences on women's physical, mental, sexual, and reproductive health, as well as birth outcomes. Women who encounter IPV are more likely to experience adverse birth outcomes such as low birth weight, premature delivery, and stillbirth. Although numerous studies are exploring the association between IPV and adverse birth outcomes, they merely used classical models and could not control for potential confounders. The purpose of this study was to ascertain whether there was a causation between IPV and adverse birth outcomes in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) using a quasi-experimental statistical technique [i.e., propensity score matching (PSM) analysis].</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This study used the most recent (2015-22) Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) data from 20 SSA countries. A total weighted sample of 13,727 women was included in this study. IPV (i.e., sexual, physical, emotional, and at least one form of IPV) was the exposure/treatment variable and adverse birth outcomes (preterm delivery, low birth weight, stillbirth, and macrosomia) were the outcome variables of this study. PSM was employed to estimate the impact of IPV on adverse birth outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average treatment effects (ATE) of sexual, physical, emotional, and at least one form of IPV were 0.031, 0.046, 0.084, and 0.025, respectively. Sexual, physical, emotional, and at least one form of IPV increased adverse birth outcomes by 3.1%, 4.6%, 8.4%, and 2.5%, respectively. Findings from the average treatment effect on treated (ATT) showed that women who experienced sexual, physical, emotional, and at least one form of IPV had an increased risk of adverse birth outcomes by 3.6%, 3.7%, 3.3%, and 3.0%, respectively, among treated groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates a causal relationship between IPV and adverse birth outcomes in SSA countries, indicating a need for programs and effective interventions to mitigate the impact of IPV during pregnancy to reduce related adverse pregnancy outcomes. Furthermore, we suggest further research that investigates the causal effect of IPV on adverse birth outcomes by incorporating additional proximal variables not observed in this study.</p>","PeriodicalId":73087,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in global women's health","volume":"5 ","pages":"1420422"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11551045/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in global women's health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fgwh.2024.1420422","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a significant public health problem, with serious consequences on women's physical, mental, sexual, and reproductive health, as well as birth outcomes. Women who encounter IPV are more likely to experience adverse birth outcomes such as low birth weight, premature delivery, and stillbirth. Although numerous studies are exploring the association between IPV and adverse birth outcomes, they merely used classical models and could not control for potential confounders. The purpose of this study was to ascertain whether there was a causation between IPV and adverse birth outcomes in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) using a quasi-experimental statistical technique [i.e., propensity score matching (PSM) analysis].

Method: This study used the most recent (2015-22) Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) data from 20 SSA countries. A total weighted sample of 13,727 women was included in this study. IPV (i.e., sexual, physical, emotional, and at least one form of IPV) was the exposure/treatment variable and adverse birth outcomes (preterm delivery, low birth weight, stillbirth, and macrosomia) were the outcome variables of this study. PSM was employed to estimate the impact of IPV on adverse birth outcomes.

Results: The average treatment effects (ATE) of sexual, physical, emotional, and at least one form of IPV were 0.031, 0.046, 0.084, and 0.025, respectively. Sexual, physical, emotional, and at least one form of IPV increased adverse birth outcomes by 3.1%, 4.6%, 8.4%, and 2.5%, respectively. Findings from the average treatment effect on treated (ATT) showed that women who experienced sexual, physical, emotional, and at least one form of IPV had an increased risk of adverse birth outcomes by 3.6%, 3.7%, 3.3%, and 3.0%, respectively, among treated groups.

Conclusion: This study demonstrates a causal relationship between IPV and adverse birth outcomes in SSA countries, indicating a need for programs and effective interventions to mitigate the impact of IPV during pregnancy to reduce related adverse pregnancy outcomes. Furthermore, we suggest further research that investigates the causal effect of IPV on adverse birth outcomes by incorporating additional proximal variables not observed in this study.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
撒哈拉以南非洲 20 个国家中亲密伴侣暴力对不良生育后果的影响:倾向得分匹配分析。
背景:亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)是一个严重的公共卫生问题,对妇女的身体、精神、性和生殖健康以及分娩结果都有严重影响。遭遇 IPV 的妇女更有可能出现不良的分娩结果,如出生体重不足、早产和死胎。尽管许多研究都在探讨 IPV 与不良分娩结局之间的关联,但这些研究仅仅使用了经典模型,无法控制潜在的混杂因素。本研究的目的是利用准实验统计技术(即倾向得分匹配(PSM)分析)确定 IPV 与撒哈拉以南非洲(SSA)的不良出生结局之间是否存在因果关系:本研究使用了来自 20 个撒哈拉以南非洲国家的最新(2015-22 年)人口与健康调查(DHS)数据。本研究共纳入了 13,727 名妇女的加权样本。IPV(即性暴力、肢体暴力、情感暴力和至少一种形式的 IPV)是本研究的暴露/治疗变量,不良分娩结局(早产、低出生体重、死胎和巨大儿)是本研究的结果变量。研究采用PSM方法估算了IPV对不良出生结局的影响:性、身体、情感和至少一种形式的 IPV 的平均治疗效果(ATE)分别为 0.031、0.046、0.084 和 0.025。性暴力、身体暴力、情感暴力和至少一种形式的 IPV 分别使不良生育后果增加了 3.1%、4.6%、8.4% 和 2.5%。平均治疗效果(ATT)结果显示,在治疗组中,遭受过性暴力、肢体暴力、情感暴力和至少一种形式的 IPV 的妇女的不良分娩结局风险分别增加了 3.6%、3.7%、3.3% 和 3.0%:本研究表明,在撒哈拉以南非洲国家,IPV 与不良分娩结局之间存在因果关系,这表明有必要制定计划并采取有效干预措施,以减轻孕期 IPV 的影响,从而减少相关的不良妊娠结局。此外,我们建议开展进一步研究,通过纳入本研究中未观察到的其他近似变量,调查 IPV 对不良妊娠结局的因果影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
s-CAPE trauma recovery program: the need for a holistic, trauma- and violence-informed domestic violence framework. Insights into perceptions, responses, and challenges experienced by women and girls' survivors of sexual violence and their communities in rural Guinea, 2020. Safe limits on work hours for the nursing profession: a rapid evidence review. An analysis of virtual triage utilization by pregnant women prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic. What factors influence women's empowerment in Ethiopia? A multilevel analysis of Ethiopia's demographic and health survey data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1