Enhancing Lesion Detection in Inflammatory Myelopathies: A Deep Learning-Reconstructed Double Inversion Recovery MRI Approach.

Qiang Fang, Qing Yang, Bao Wang, Bing Wen, Guangrun Xu, Jingzhen He
{"title":"Enhancing Lesion Detection in Inflammatory Myelopathies: A Deep Learning-Reconstructed Double Inversion Recovery MRI Approach.","authors":"Qiang Fang, Qing Yang, Bao Wang, Bing Wen, Guangrun Xu, Jingzhen He","doi":"10.3174/ajnr.A8582","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>The imaging of inflammatory myelopathies has advanced significantly over time, with MRI techniques playing a pivotal role in enhancing lesion detection. However, the impact of deep learning (DL)-based reconstruction on 3D double inversion recovery (DIR) imaging for inflammatory myelopathies remains unassessed. This study aims to compare acquisition time, image quality, diagnostic confidence, and lesion detection rates among sagittal T2WI, standard DIR, and DL -reconstructed DIR in patients with inflammatory myelopathies.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this observational study, patients diagnosed with inflammatory myelopathies were recruited between June 2023 and March 2024. Each patient underwent sagittal conventional turbo spin-echo sequences and standard 3D DIR (T2WI and standard 3D DIR used as references for comparison), followed by an undersampled accelerated DIRDL examination. Three neuroradiologists evaluated the images using a four-point Likert scale (from 1 to 4) for overall image quality, perceived signal-tonoise ratio, sharpness, artifacts, and diagnostic confidence. The acquisition times, and lesion detection rates were also compared between the acquisition protocols.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 149 participants were evaluated (mean age 40.6 ± 16.8 years; 71 females). The median acquisition time for DIRDL was significantly lower than for standard DIR (298 seconds [interquartile range (IQR), 288-301] vs 151 seconds [IQR, 148-155]; <i>P</i> < 0.001), showing a 49%time reduction. DIRDL images scored higher in overall quality, perceived signal-to-noise ratio, and artifact noise reduction (all <i>P</i> < 0.001). There were no significant differences in sharpness (<i>P</i> = 0.07), or diagnostic confidence (<i>P</i> = 0.06) between the standard DIR and DIRDL protocols. Additionally, DIRDL detected 37% more lesions compared to T2WI (300 vs. 219; <i>P</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DIRDL significantly reduces acquisition time and improves image quality compared to standard DIR without compromising diagnostic confidence. Additionally, DIRDL enhances lesion detection in patients with inflammatory myelopathies, making it a valuable tool in clinical practice. These findings underscore the potential for incorporating DIRDL into future imaging guidelines.</p><p><strong>Abbreviations: </strong>DL = deep learning; DIR = double inversion recovery; IQR = interquartile range; MS = multiple sclerosis; AQP4+NMOSD = AQP4-IgG positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders; MOG = myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein; MOGAD = MOG antibody-associated diseases.</p>","PeriodicalId":93863,"journal":{"name":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8582","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: The imaging of inflammatory myelopathies has advanced significantly over time, with MRI techniques playing a pivotal role in enhancing lesion detection. However, the impact of deep learning (DL)-based reconstruction on 3D double inversion recovery (DIR) imaging for inflammatory myelopathies remains unassessed. This study aims to compare acquisition time, image quality, diagnostic confidence, and lesion detection rates among sagittal T2WI, standard DIR, and DL -reconstructed DIR in patients with inflammatory myelopathies.

Materials and methods: In this observational study, patients diagnosed with inflammatory myelopathies were recruited between June 2023 and March 2024. Each patient underwent sagittal conventional turbo spin-echo sequences and standard 3D DIR (T2WI and standard 3D DIR used as references for comparison), followed by an undersampled accelerated DIRDL examination. Three neuroradiologists evaluated the images using a four-point Likert scale (from 1 to 4) for overall image quality, perceived signal-tonoise ratio, sharpness, artifacts, and diagnostic confidence. The acquisition times, and lesion detection rates were also compared between the acquisition protocols.

Results: A total of 149 participants were evaluated (mean age 40.6 ± 16.8 years; 71 females). The median acquisition time for DIRDL was significantly lower than for standard DIR (298 seconds [interquartile range (IQR), 288-301] vs 151 seconds [IQR, 148-155]; P < 0.001), showing a 49%time reduction. DIRDL images scored higher in overall quality, perceived signal-to-noise ratio, and artifact noise reduction (all P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in sharpness (P = 0.07), or diagnostic confidence (P = 0.06) between the standard DIR and DIRDL protocols. Additionally, DIRDL detected 37% more lesions compared to T2WI (300 vs. 219; P < 0.001).

Conclusions: DIRDL significantly reduces acquisition time and improves image quality compared to standard DIR without compromising diagnostic confidence. Additionally, DIRDL enhances lesion detection in patients with inflammatory myelopathies, making it a valuable tool in clinical practice. These findings underscore the potential for incorporating DIRDL into future imaging guidelines.

Abbreviations: DL = deep learning; DIR = double inversion recovery; IQR = interquartile range; MS = multiple sclerosis; AQP4+NMOSD = AQP4-IgG positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders; MOG = myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein; MOGAD = MOG antibody-associated diseases.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
增强炎症性骨髓病的病变检测:深度学习-重建双反转恢复磁共振成像方法。
背景和目的:随着时间的推移,炎症性骨髓病的成像技术有了长足的进步,核磁共振成像技术在提高病变检测能力方面发挥了关键作用。然而,基于深度学习(DL)的重建对炎症性骨髓病的三维双反转恢复(DIR)成像的影响仍未得到评估。本研究旨在比较炎性骨髓病患者的矢状T2WI、标准DIR和基于深度学习重建的DIR的采集时间、图像质量、诊断信心和病变检出率:在这项观察性研究中,2023 年 6 月至 2024 年 3 月期间招募了被诊断为炎症性骨髓疾病的患者。每名患者均接受了矢状传统涡轮自旋回波序列和标准三维 DIR(T2WI 和标准三维 DIR 作为对比参考),随后接受了欠采样加速 DIRDL 检查。三位神经放射学专家采用李克特四点量表(1 到 4 分)对图像的整体质量、感知信噪比、清晰度、伪影和诊断信心进行了评估。此外,还比较了两种采集方案的采集时间和病变检出率:共有 149 名参与者接受了评估(平均年龄为 40.6 ± 16.8 岁;71 名女性)。DIRDL 的中位采集时间明显少于标准 DIR(298 秒 [四分位数间距 (IQR),288-301] vs 151 秒 [四分位数间距 (IQR),148-155];P < 0.001),缩短了 49%。DIRDL 图像在总体质量、感知信噪比和伪影降噪方面得分更高(均 P < 0.001)。标准 DIR 和 DIRDL 方案在清晰度(P = 0.07)或诊断信心(P = 0.06)方面没有明显差异。此外,与 T2WI 相比,DIRDL 多检测出 37% 的病灶(300 对 219;P < 0.001):结论:与标准 DIR 相比,DIRDL 大大缩短了采集时间,提高了图像质量,同时不影响诊断信心。此外,DIRDL还能提高炎症性骨髓疾病患者的病灶检测能力,使其成为临床实践中的重要工具。这些发现强调了将 DIRDL 纳入未来成像指南的潜力:缩写:DL = 深度学习;DIR = 双反转恢复;IQR = 四分位数范围;MS = 多发性硬化症;AQP4+NMOSD = AQP4-IgG 阳性神经脊髓炎视网膜频谱疾病;MOG = 髓鞘少突胶质细胞糖蛋白;MOGAD = MOG 抗体相关疾病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Arterial Spin-Labeling and DSC Perfusion MR Imaging in Pediatric Brain Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Diagnostic Performance of Renal Contrast Excretion on Early-Phase CT Myelography in Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension. Prolonged Venous Transit on Perfusion Imaging is Associated with Longer Lengths of Stay in Acute Large Vessel Occlusions. Accuracy of an nnUNet neural network for the automatic segmentation of intracranial aneurysms, their parent vessels and major cerebral arteries from magnetic resonance imaging-Time of flight (MRI-TOF). Accuracy of Financial Disclosures by Scientific Presenters/Authors at the ASNR 2024 annual meeting.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1