Electrocortical Profiles in Relation to Childhood Adversity and Depression Severity: A Preliminary Report.

Natalia Jaworska, Sara de la Salle, Bronwen Schryver, Meagan Birmingham, Jennifer L Phillips, Pierre Blier, Verner Knott
{"title":"Electrocortical Profiles in Relation to Childhood Adversity and Depression Severity: A Preliminary Report.","authors":"Natalia Jaworska, Sara de la Salle, Bronwen Schryver, Meagan Birmingham, Jennifer L Phillips, Pierre Blier, Verner Knott","doi":"10.1177/15500594241294021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Assessment of electroencephalographic (EEG) activity in depression has provided insights into neural profiles of the illness. However, there is limited understanding on how symptom severity and risk factors, such as childhood adversity, influence EEG features. <b>Methods:</b> Eyes-closed EEG was acquired in N = 28 depressed individuals being treated in a tertiary psychiatric setting. Absolute alpha, beta, theta, and delta power and inter-/intra-hemispheric coherence were examined. Relations between the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Scale (MADRS) and Adverse Childhood Experience (ACE) Questionnaire and EEG features were assessed. <b>Results:</b> Individuals in the high (MADRS≥30) versus lower (MADRS ≤ 29) symptom severity group exhibited greater overall beta power, and lower Fp<sub>1</sub>-Fp<sub>2</sub> delta and theta coherence. Those with high (≥3) versus lower (≤2) ACE scores exhibited greater T<sub>7</sub>-T<sub>8</sub> beta coherence. Lowest F<sub>3</sub>-F<sub>4</sub> beta coherence was observed in those with high ACE/high depression severity. A negative correlation existed between F<sub>8</sub>-P<sub>8</sub> alpha coherence and symptom severity. <b>Conclusions:</b> Those with higher depression severity exhibit increased beta power, possibly reflecting a hyper-vigilant state<b>.</b> Depression severity and ACE history may produce subtle alterations in frontal delta/theta and temporal/frontal beta coherence regions. <b>Significance:</b> This is the first study to examine the neural impact of depression severity and ACE-assessed childhood trauma in depressed individuals receiving treatment in a tertiary setting, accounting for the clinical reality of the prevalence of their co-occurrence.</p>","PeriodicalId":93940,"journal":{"name":"Clinical EEG and neuroscience","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical EEG and neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15500594241294021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Assessment of electroencephalographic (EEG) activity in depression has provided insights into neural profiles of the illness. However, there is limited understanding on how symptom severity and risk factors, such as childhood adversity, influence EEG features. Methods: Eyes-closed EEG was acquired in N = 28 depressed individuals being treated in a tertiary psychiatric setting. Absolute alpha, beta, theta, and delta power and inter-/intra-hemispheric coherence were examined. Relations between the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Scale (MADRS) and Adverse Childhood Experience (ACE) Questionnaire and EEG features were assessed. Results: Individuals in the high (MADRS≥30) versus lower (MADRS ≤ 29) symptom severity group exhibited greater overall beta power, and lower Fp1-Fp2 delta and theta coherence. Those with high (≥3) versus lower (≤2) ACE scores exhibited greater T7-T8 beta coherence. Lowest F3-F4 beta coherence was observed in those with high ACE/high depression severity. A negative correlation existed between F8-P8 alpha coherence and symptom severity. Conclusions: Those with higher depression severity exhibit increased beta power, possibly reflecting a hyper-vigilant state. Depression severity and ACE history may produce subtle alterations in frontal delta/theta and temporal/frontal beta coherence regions. Significance: This is the first study to examine the neural impact of depression severity and ACE-assessed childhood trauma in depressed individuals receiving treatment in a tertiary setting, accounting for the clinical reality of the prevalence of their co-occurrence.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与童年逆境和抑郁严重程度相关的皮质电图:初步报告
目的:通过评估抑郁症患者的脑电图(EEG)活动,可以了解该疾病的神经特征。然而,人们对症状严重程度和风险因素(如童年逆境)如何影响脑电图特征的了解还很有限。研究方法对在三级精神病院接受治疗的 N = 28 名抑郁症患者进行闭眼脑电图采集。对绝对α、β、θ和δ功率以及半球间/半球内相干性进行了检查。还评估了蒙哥马利-奥斯伯格抑郁量表(MADRS)和童年不良经历问卷(ACE)与脑电图特征之间的关系。结果显示症状严重程度高(MADRS≥30)组与症状严重程度低(MADRS≤29)组的个体表现出更高的总体β功率,以及更低的 Fp1-Fp2 delta 和 theta 相干性。ACE评分高(≥3)与低(≤2)组的患者表现出更高的T7-T8β相干性。在 ACE 高/抑郁严重程度高的人群中,F3-F4 β 相干性最低。F8-P8 α连贯性与症状严重程度呈负相关。结论抑郁严重程度较高的人表现出更高的β功率,这可能反映了他们的过度警觉状态。抑郁严重程度和 ACE 病史可能会导致额叶 delta/theta 和颞叶/额叶 beta 相干性区域发生微妙变化。意义重大:这是第一项针对在三级医院接受治疗的抑郁症患者,研究抑郁症严重程度和ACE评估的童年创伤对神经系统影响的研究,同时考虑到了两者同时存在的临床现实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mismatch Negativity as an Index of Auditory Short-Term Plasticity: Associations with Cortisol, Inflammation, and Gray Matter Volume in Youth at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis. Early Impairment of Face Perception in Post-Stroke Depression: An ERP Study. Electrocortical Profiles in Relation to Childhood Adversity and Depression Severity: A Preliminary Report. From the Laboratory to the Real-World: The Role of Mismatch Negativity in Psychosis. Speech Mismatch Negativity (MMN) in Schizophrenia with Auditory Verbal Hallucinations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1