Sujata P Sarda, Guillaume Germain, Malena Mahendran, Jacob Klimek, Wendy Y Cheng, Roger Luo, Mei Sheng Duh
{"title":"Real-World Healthcare Resource Utilization, Healthcare Costs, and Injurious Falls Among Elderly Patients with Geographic Atrophy.","authors":"Sujata P Sarda, Guillaume Germain, Malena Mahendran, Jacob Klimek, Wendy Y Cheng, Roger Luo, Mei Sheng Duh","doi":"10.2147/OPTH.S475331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study assessed the clinical and economic burden of geographic atrophy (GA) using real-world data from elderly patients with Medicare Advantage plans in the United States.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort design of patients with GA only, GA + visual impairment (GA + VI), GA + blindness (GA + B), and patients without GA were identified using administrative healthcare claims data from Optum Clinformatics Data Mart. Inverse probability of treatment weighting controlled for confounding when comparing patients with GA only vs without GA, GA + VI vs GA only, and GA + B vs GA only. Endpoints included all-cause and ophthalmic condition-related healthcare resource utilization (HRU), injurious falls, and healthcare costs. HRU and injurious falls were assessed per-person-per-year and per 100 person-years, respectively. Cohorts were compared using rate ratios, 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and p-values from weighted Poisson regression models. Healthcare costs were evaluated per-person-per-year using mean cost differences, 95% CIs, and p-values from weighted linear regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 18,119 patients with GA only, 2,285 with GA + VI, 1,716 with GA + B, and 72,476 patients without GA. Higher rates of all-cause hospitalizations (RR [95% CI]: 1.08 [1.03, 1.12]), outpatient visits (1.08 [1.05, 1.10]), other visits (1.14 [1.08, 1.21]), and falls with head injuries (1.24 [1.05, 1.45]) were observed in patients with GA vs without GA (P<0.05). GA was associated with higher annual all-cause total healthcare costs, spending an average of $1,171 more after adjustment (P<0.05). Progression to GA + VI and GA + B was associated with a more pronounced burden.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The clinical and economic burden of GA is substantial and escalates as the disease advances. These findings suggest early intervention aimed at slowing GA progression may help to mitigate the healthcare burden associated with advancement of GA to visual impairment and blindness.</p>","PeriodicalId":93945,"journal":{"name":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11559221/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S475331","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: This study assessed the clinical and economic burden of geographic atrophy (GA) using real-world data from elderly patients with Medicare Advantage plans in the United States.
Patients and methods: A retrospective cohort design of patients with GA only, GA + visual impairment (GA + VI), GA + blindness (GA + B), and patients without GA were identified using administrative healthcare claims data from Optum Clinformatics Data Mart. Inverse probability of treatment weighting controlled for confounding when comparing patients with GA only vs without GA, GA + VI vs GA only, and GA + B vs GA only. Endpoints included all-cause and ophthalmic condition-related healthcare resource utilization (HRU), injurious falls, and healthcare costs. HRU and injurious falls were assessed per-person-per-year and per 100 person-years, respectively. Cohorts were compared using rate ratios, 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and p-values from weighted Poisson regression models. Healthcare costs were evaluated per-person-per-year using mean cost differences, 95% CIs, and p-values from weighted linear regression.
Results: The study included 18,119 patients with GA only, 2,285 with GA + VI, 1,716 with GA + B, and 72,476 patients without GA. Higher rates of all-cause hospitalizations (RR [95% CI]: 1.08 [1.03, 1.12]), outpatient visits (1.08 [1.05, 1.10]), other visits (1.14 [1.08, 1.21]), and falls with head injuries (1.24 [1.05, 1.45]) were observed in patients with GA vs without GA (P<0.05). GA was associated with higher annual all-cause total healthcare costs, spending an average of $1,171 more after adjustment (P<0.05). Progression to GA + VI and GA + B was associated with a more pronounced burden.
Conclusion: The clinical and economic burden of GA is substantial and escalates as the disease advances. These findings suggest early intervention aimed at slowing GA progression may help to mitigate the healthcare burden associated with advancement of GA to visual impairment and blindness.
目的:本研究利用美国医疗保险优势计划(Medicare Advantage Plan)老年患者的真实数据,评估了地理萎缩(GA)的临床和经济负担:利用 Optum Clinformatics Data Mart 中的行政医疗索赔数据,对仅患有地心性萎缩的患者、患有地心性萎缩+视力障碍(GA + VI)的患者、患有地心性萎缩+失明(GA + B)的患者以及不患有地心性萎缩的患者进行了回顾性队列设计。在比较仅有 GA 与没有 GA、GA + VI 与仅有 GA 和 GA + B 与仅有 GA 的患者时,治疗的逆概率加权控制了混杂因素。终点包括全因和眼科疾病相关的医疗资源利用率(HRU)、伤害性跌倒和医疗成本。HRU和伤害性跌倒分别按每人每年和每100人每年进行评估。使用加权泊松回归模型中的比率比、95% 置信区间(CI)和 p 值对各组进行比较。使用加权线性回归的平均成本差异、95% 置信区间和 p 值对每人每年的医疗成本进行评估:研究包括 18119 名仅患有 GA 的患者、2285 名患有 GA + VI 的患者、1716 名患有 GA + B 的患者以及 72476 名未患有 GA 的患者。观察发现,GA 患者与非 GA 患者的全因住院率(RR [95% CI]:1.08 [1.03, 1.12])、门诊就诊率(1.08 [1.05, 1.10])、其他就诊率(1.14 [1.08, 1.21])和头部受伤跌倒率(1.24 [1.05, 1.45])均较高:GA造成的临床和经济负担巨大,并随着病情的发展而不断加重。这些研究结果表明,旨在减缓GA进展的早期干预措施可能有助于减轻因GA发展为视力损伤和失明而带来的医疗负担。