Bird beak-related ocular injuries in southern India: Factors and visual implications

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured Pub Date : 2024-10-31 DOI:10.1016/j.injury.2024.112003
Prerana A Shetty , Sze Ing Tan , Rupesh Agrawal , Sushank Ashok Bhalerao , Sowjanya Vuyyuru
{"title":"Bird beak-related ocular injuries in southern India: Factors and visual implications","authors":"Prerana A Shetty ,&nbsp;Sze Ing Tan ,&nbsp;Rupesh Agrawal ,&nbsp;Sushank Ashok Bhalerao ,&nbsp;Sowjanya Vuyyuru","doi":"10.1016/j.injury.2024.112003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To evaluate the visual outcomes and identify prognostic factors in patients with ocular bird beak injuries treated at a tertiary eye care center in South India.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a comprehensive analysis of patients with bird beak injuries, considering factors such as age, gender, mode of injury, and size of laceration. The affected eyes underwent detailed examinations using slit-lamp biomicroscopy, and B-scan ultrasonography was performed to assess the status of the posterior segment. Postoperatively, the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was measured at the last follow-up visit.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Our findings demonstrated significant improvements in visual outcomes, including BCVA and uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), over a follow-up period ranging from 1 week to 3 years (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05). No significant changes were observed in endophthalmitis, intraocular pressure (IOP), lens status, or retinal abnormalities during the study duration.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This retrospective study highlight the potential for favorable long-term visual improvement in patients with ocular injuries caused by bird beaks and emphasize the importance of timely intervention. Delayed surgical treatment and the requirement for multiple surgeries within the first week were found to negatively impact visual acuity. Hence, it is crucial to raise public awareness, particularly in rural areas, to prevent these potentially devastating injuries and ensure early intervention for optimal visual recovery.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54978,"journal":{"name":"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured","volume":"55 12","pages":"Article 112003"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020138324007472","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the visual outcomes and identify prognostic factors in patients with ocular bird beak injuries treated at a tertiary eye care center in South India.

Methods

We conducted a comprehensive analysis of patients with bird beak injuries, considering factors such as age, gender, mode of injury, and size of laceration. The affected eyes underwent detailed examinations using slit-lamp biomicroscopy, and B-scan ultrasonography was performed to assess the status of the posterior segment. Postoperatively, the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was measured at the last follow-up visit.

Results

Our findings demonstrated significant improvements in visual outcomes, including BCVA and uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), over a follow-up period ranging from 1 week to 3 years (p < 0.05). No significant changes were observed in endophthalmitis, intraocular pressure (IOP), lens status, or retinal abnormalities during the study duration.

Conclusion

This retrospective study highlight the potential for favorable long-term visual improvement in patients with ocular injuries caused by bird beaks and emphasize the importance of timely intervention. Delayed surgical treatment and the requirement for multiple surgeries within the first week were found to negatively impact visual acuity. Hence, it is crucial to raise public awareness, particularly in rural areas, to prevent these potentially devastating injuries and ensure early intervention for optimal visual recovery.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度南部与鸟喙有关的眼部伤害:因素和视觉影响。
目的:评估在南印度一家三级眼科医疗中心接受治疗的鸟喙伤患者的视觉效果并确定预后因素:我们对鸟喙伤患者进行了综合分析,考虑了年龄、性别、受伤方式和裂口大小等因素。我们使用裂隙灯生物显微镜对受影响的眼睛进行了详细检查,并进行了 B 型扫描超声波检查以评估眼球后段的状况。术后,在最后一次随访时测量了最佳矫正视力(BCVA):结果:我们的研究结果表明,在 1 周至 3 年的随访期间,包括 BCVA 和未矫正视力 (UCVA) 在内的视觉效果均有明显改善(P < 0.05)。研究期间,眼底病、眼压、晶状体状态或视网膜异常均未出现明显变化:这项回顾性研究强调了鸟喙造成眼部损伤的患者长期视力改善的可能性,并强调了及时干预的重要性。研究发现,延迟手术治疗和在第一周内进行多次手术会对视力产生负面影响。因此,提高公众意识至关重要,尤其是在农村地区,以防止这些潜在的破坏性伤害,并确保早期干预以实现最佳视力恢复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
8.00%
发文量
699
审稿时长
96 days
期刊介绍: Injury was founded in 1969 and is an international journal dealing with all aspects of trauma care and accident surgery. Our primary aim is to facilitate the exchange of ideas, techniques and information among all members of the trauma team.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Letter to the editor regarding “ The paediatric polytrauma CT-indication (PePCI)-score–development of a prognostic model to reduce unnecessary CT scans in paediatric trauma patients” Respond to letter to the Editor regarding “The paediatric polytrauma CT-indication (PePCI)-score–development of a prognostic model to reduce unnecessary CT scans in paediatric trauma patients” AO In-Hospital program: A truly novel educational platform for operating room personnel (ORP) and clinicians? Humeral shaft periprosthetic fractures: Fracture patterns differ between short and standard-length arthroplasty stems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1