Impact of universal use of the McGrath videolaryngoscope as the first option for all intubations in the operating room: The multicentre prospective before-after VIDEOLAR-SURGERY study protocol.

M Taboada, A Estany-Gestal, P Rama-Maceiras, M A Orallo, M Bermúdez, C Barreiro, L Gómez, M Amor, F Otero, J Fernández, N Molins, J J Amate, B Bascuas, R Rey, M C Alonso, M J Castro, A Sarmiento, L Dos Santos, C Nieto, S Paredes, A Velasco, C Taboada, L Martín, D Campaña, E Mosquera, C Novoa, S Varela, L da Silva, E Domínguez, A Bedoya, A I Gómez, M Estévez, P Martínez, R Sotojove, A Naveiro, C Díaz, R Ruido, P Mirón, M González, C Francisco, J Regueira, M Peiteado, M Eiras, E Paz
{"title":"Impact of universal use of the McGrath videolaryngoscope as the first option for all intubations in the operating room: The multicentre prospective before-after VIDEOLAR-SURGERY study protocol.","authors":"M Taboada, A Estany-Gestal, P Rama-Maceiras, M A Orallo, M Bermúdez, C Barreiro, L Gómez, M Amor, F Otero, J Fernández, N Molins, J J Amate, B Bascuas, R Rey, M C Alonso, M J Castro, A Sarmiento, L Dos Santos, C Nieto, S Paredes, A Velasco, C Taboada, L Martín, D Campaña, E Mosquera, C Novoa, S Varela, L da Silva, E Domínguez, A Bedoya, A I Gómez, M Estévez, P Martínez, R Sotojove, A Naveiro, C Díaz, R Ruido, P Mirón, M González, C Francisco, J Regueira, M Peiteado, M Eiras, E Paz","doi":"10.1016/j.redare.2024.101649","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Standard tracheal intubation performed in the operating room is based on direct laryngoscopy using a standard Macintosh laryngoscope. Several authors recommend the universal use of a video laryngoscope as the first option for all intubations, regardless of whether the patient has predictors of a difficult airway or not. We hypothesize that using the McGrath video laryngoscope as the first intubation option increases the frequency of patients with easy intubation, and decreases intubation-related complications.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>The VIDEOLAR-SURGERY trial is a prospective, multicentre, open-label, interventional, before-after study. In the pre-implementation period (non-interventional phase, 6-9 months [2600 intubations]), 35 anaesthesiologists from 8 hospitals perform all tracheal intubations for an elective or urgent surgical procedure using the standard Macintosh direct laryngoscope as the first intubation option. During the implementation period (2 months), each anaesthesiologist is given a McGrath Mac video laryngoscope and trained in its use. During the post-implementation period (interventional-phase, 6-9 months [2600 intubations]), the 35 anaesthesiologists perform all tracheal intubations using a McGrath Mac video laryngoscope as the first intubation option. The main objective of this study is to evaluate whether the use of a McGrath Mac video laryngoscope as the first intubation option increases the percentage of patients with easy intubation compared with the standard Macintosh laryngoscope.</p><p><strong>Ethics and dissemination: </strong>The study protocol was approved on 2 May 2023 by the Ethics Committee of Galicia, Spain (CEI-SL, code No. 2023-177), and was registered on the Clinicaltrials.gov clinical trials registry under No. NCT NCT05850260. Informed consent is required. The results will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at one or more scientific conferences. If video laryngoscopy improves easy intubation compared with Macintosh direct laryngoscopy in all operating room intubations, its use may well become standard practice, thereby decreasing the risks of intubation-related complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":94196,"journal":{"name":"Revista espanola de anestesiologia y reanimacion","volume":" ","pages":"101649"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista espanola de anestesiologia y reanimacion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redare.2024.101649","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Standard tracheal intubation performed in the operating room is based on direct laryngoscopy using a standard Macintosh laryngoscope. Several authors recommend the universal use of a video laryngoscope as the first option for all intubations, regardless of whether the patient has predictors of a difficult airway or not. We hypothesize that using the McGrath video laryngoscope as the first intubation option increases the frequency of patients with easy intubation, and decreases intubation-related complications.

Methods and analysis: The VIDEOLAR-SURGERY trial is a prospective, multicentre, open-label, interventional, before-after study. In the pre-implementation period (non-interventional phase, 6-9 months [2600 intubations]), 35 anaesthesiologists from 8 hospitals perform all tracheal intubations for an elective or urgent surgical procedure using the standard Macintosh direct laryngoscope as the first intubation option. During the implementation period (2 months), each anaesthesiologist is given a McGrath Mac video laryngoscope and trained in its use. During the post-implementation period (interventional-phase, 6-9 months [2600 intubations]), the 35 anaesthesiologists perform all tracheal intubations using a McGrath Mac video laryngoscope as the first intubation option. The main objective of this study is to evaluate whether the use of a McGrath Mac video laryngoscope as the first intubation option increases the percentage of patients with easy intubation compared with the standard Macintosh laryngoscope.

Ethics and dissemination: The study protocol was approved on 2 May 2023 by the Ethics Committee of Galicia, Spain (CEI-SL, code No. 2023-177), and was registered on the Clinicaltrials.gov clinical trials registry under No. NCT NCT05850260. Informed consent is required. The results will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at one or more scientific conferences. If video laryngoscopy improves easy intubation compared with Macintosh direct laryngoscopy in all operating room intubations, its use may well become standard practice, thereby decreasing the risks of intubation-related complications.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将麦格视频喉镜作为手术室内所有插管的首选方案的影响:VIDEOLAR-SURGERY前后多中心前瞻性研究方案。
介绍:在手术室进行的标准气管插管是使用标准麦金塔喉镜进行直接喉镜检查。多位学者建议,无论患者是否有困难气道的预兆,都应将视频喉镜作为所有插管的首选。我们假设,将麦格视频喉镜作为第一插管选择可增加患者轻松插管的频率,并减少插管相关并发症:VIDEOLAR-SURGERY 试验是一项前瞻性、多中心、开放标签、干预性、前后对比研究。在实施前阶段(非干预阶段,6-9 个月[2600 例插管]),来自 8 家医院的 35 名麻醉医师使用标准 Macintosh 直接喉镜作为第一插管选择,为择期或紧急外科手术进行所有气管插管。在实施期间(2 个月),每名麻醉师都会获得一个麦金塔视频喉镜,并接受使用培训。在实施后阶段(介入阶段,6-9 个月 [2600 例插管]),35 名麻醉医师使用 McGrath Mac 视频喉镜作为第一插管选择进行所有气管插管。本研究的主要目的是评估与标准麦金塔视频喉镜相比,使用麦金塔视频喉镜作为第一插管选择是否能提高轻松插管患者的比例:该研究方案于 2023 年 5 月 2 日获得西班牙加利西亚伦理委员会(CEI-SL,代码号 2023-177)批准,并在 Clinicaltrials.gov 临床试验注册中心注册,注册号为 NCT NCT05850260。该试验需要知情同意。研究结果将在同行评审期刊上发表,并在一次或多次科学会议上展示。如果在所有手术室插管中,视频喉镜比麦金托什直接喉镜更容易插管,那么视频喉镜的使用很可能成为标准做法,从而降低插管相关并发症的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Blood recirculation during continuous renal replacement therapy due to a thrombus in the inferior vena cava. Incidence and risk factors of chronic post-thoracic surgery pain: A retrospective study. Quantitative analysis of genicular nerve block spread and variability: Anatomical correlations and clinical implications. Simultaneous cardiac perforation and left pneumothorax as complications of temporary pacemaker probe. Sonoanatomy of the difficult airway. A case-control study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1