Do investor reactions to merger announcements shape the writing of SEC filings?

IF 9.4 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE British Accounting Review Pub Date : 2025-05-01 DOI:10.1016/j.bar.2024.101498
Nihat Aktas, Eric de Bodt, Can Deniz Dogan
{"title":"Do investor reactions to merger announcements shape the writing of SEC filings?","authors":"Nihat Aktas,&nbsp;Eric de Bodt,&nbsp;Can Deniz Dogan","doi":"10.1016/j.bar.2024.101498","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The way filings of mergers and acquisitions (M&amp;A) with the Security Exchange Commission (SEC) are written might depend on investor reactions to initial public announcements of the deal. We examine this investor feedback hypothesis by focusing on the readability and timing of a large sample of SEC documents. We show that acquirers write documents with lower readability and file them faster when investors react negatively to the deal announcement, a finding consistent with strategic obfuscation efforts. The results are robust to alternative empirical choices, such as controlling for deal complexity or the firm's writing style. They are also confirmed using an instrumental variables approach.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47996,"journal":{"name":"British Accounting Review","volume":"57 3","pages":"Article 101498"},"PeriodicalIF":9.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Accounting Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890838924002786","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The way filings of mergers and acquisitions (M&A) with the Security Exchange Commission (SEC) are written might depend on investor reactions to initial public announcements of the deal. We examine this investor feedback hypothesis by focusing on the readability and timing of a large sample of SEC documents. We show that acquirers write documents with lower readability and file them faster when investors react negatively to the deal announcement, a finding consistent with strategic obfuscation efforts. The results are robust to alternative empirical choices, such as controlling for deal complexity or the firm's writing style. They are also confirmed using an instrumental variables approach.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
投资者对合并公告的反应是否会影响 SEC 文件的撰写?
向美国证券交易委员会(SEC)提交的并购(M&A)文件的撰写方式可能取决于投资者对交易最初公告的反应。我们通过研究大量 SEC 文件样本的可读性和时间安排来检验投资者反馈假设。我们的研究表明,当投资者对交易公告有负面反应时,收购方撰写的文件可读性较低,提交文件的速度也较快,这一结果与策略性混淆努力是一致的。这些结果对其他经验选择(如控制交易复杂性或公司的写作风格)是稳健的。使用工具变量方法也证实了这些结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
British Accounting Review
British Accounting Review BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
3.90%
发文量
39
审稿时长
76 days
期刊介绍: The British Accounting Review*is pleased to publish original scholarly papers across the whole spectrum of accounting and finance. The journal is eclectic and pluralistic and contributions are welcomed across a wide range of research methodologies (e.g. analytical, archival, experimental, survey and qualitative case methods) and topics (e.g. financial accounting, management accounting, finance and financial management, auditing, public sector accounting, social and environmental accounting; accounting education and accounting history), evidence from UK and non-UK sources are equally acceptable.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Performance management, metric quality, and trust: Survey evidence from healthcare organizations Earnings management in local government healthcare reporting: Financial distress vs. peer influence? From traditional to digital: Unravelling performance measurement systems and accounting methods in drug treatment through a systematic review and content analysis Hospital Management Accounting Systems: Evolving roles, actors, and interactions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1