Rain event detection and magnitude estimation during Indian summer monsoon: Comprehensive assessment of gridded precipitation datasets across hydroclimatically diverse regions

IF 4.5 2区 地球科学 Q1 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES Atmospheric Research Pub Date : 2024-11-05 DOI:10.1016/j.atmosres.2024.107761
Sandipan Paul , Priyank J. Sharma , Ramesh S.V. Teegavarapu
{"title":"Rain event detection and magnitude estimation during Indian summer monsoon: Comprehensive assessment of gridded precipitation datasets across hydroclimatically diverse regions","authors":"Sandipan Paul ,&nbsp;Priyank J. Sharma ,&nbsp;Ramesh S.V. Teegavarapu","doi":"10.1016/j.atmosres.2024.107761","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Accurate precipitation estimates are quintessential for hydrologic modeling and climate studies. Different gridded precipitation products are available in any region, and selecting the best one is essential for hydroclimatic modeling and analysis. In the current study, observation- (APHRODITE), reanalysis- (IMDAA, ERA5-Land, PGF), satellite-based (IMERG, CHIRPS, PERSIANN-CDR), and hybrid (MSWEP) gridded precipitation products with different spatial and temporal resolutions are evaluated using several continuous, categorical, graphical, and interval-based performance measures towards detecting Indian Summer Monsoon Rainfall (ISMR) events and estimating their magnitudes for the subcontinent of India, considering IMD gauge-based gridded data as reference product. We confine our analysis to the monsoon season (i.e., June to September), the principal rainy season in the Indian sub-continent. The dearth of data and limited rain gauge-based observations from non-uniform sparse monitoring networks across India necessitated grid-to-grid comparative evaluations instead of point-to-grid assessments. We propose a new ranking framework to determine the suitability of precipitation datasets for twenty-seven hydroclimatic regions comprising homogeneous rainfall zones, Köppen-Geiger climate zones, and major river basins. Results from the comprehensive evaluation suggest that (1) APHRODITE, MSWEP, and ERA5-Land best approximate precipitation event occurrences across India, (2) MSWEP and ERA5-Land are most suitable (highest rank) alternatives at the regional level, while APHRODITE is found to be next suitable dataset owing to its persistent dry bias, (3) CHIRPS and IMERG have reasonably lower rank score across India, (4) close agreement of examined datasets is noted over semi-arid and sub-humid regions (e.g., peninsular and central India), whereas ERA5-Land, IMDAA, and APHRODITE fail to detect and reproduce the intensity of the events along the west coast and northeastern India, (5) PGF and PERSIANN-CDR are the least situated datasets. Moreover, the present study provides a unique and innovative perspective to characterise the precipitation over a vast topographic, ecologic, and climatic gradient region like India.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8600,"journal":{"name":"Atmospheric Research","volume":"313 ","pages":"Article 107761"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atmospheric Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016980952400543X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurate precipitation estimates are quintessential for hydrologic modeling and climate studies. Different gridded precipitation products are available in any region, and selecting the best one is essential for hydroclimatic modeling and analysis. In the current study, observation- (APHRODITE), reanalysis- (IMDAA, ERA5-Land, PGF), satellite-based (IMERG, CHIRPS, PERSIANN-CDR), and hybrid (MSWEP) gridded precipitation products with different spatial and temporal resolutions are evaluated using several continuous, categorical, graphical, and interval-based performance measures towards detecting Indian Summer Monsoon Rainfall (ISMR) events and estimating their magnitudes for the subcontinent of India, considering IMD gauge-based gridded data as reference product. We confine our analysis to the monsoon season (i.e., June to September), the principal rainy season in the Indian sub-continent. The dearth of data and limited rain gauge-based observations from non-uniform sparse monitoring networks across India necessitated grid-to-grid comparative evaluations instead of point-to-grid assessments. We propose a new ranking framework to determine the suitability of precipitation datasets for twenty-seven hydroclimatic regions comprising homogeneous rainfall zones, Köppen-Geiger climate zones, and major river basins. Results from the comprehensive evaluation suggest that (1) APHRODITE, MSWEP, and ERA5-Land best approximate precipitation event occurrences across India, (2) MSWEP and ERA5-Land are most suitable (highest rank) alternatives at the regional level, while APHRODITE is found to be next suitable dataset owing to its persistent dry bias, (3) CHIRPS and IMERG have reasonably lower rank score across India, (4) close agreement of examined datasets is noted over semi-arid and sub-humid regions (e.g., peninsular and central India), whereas ERA5-Land, IMDAA, and APHRODITE fail to detect and reproduce the intensity of the events along the west coast and northeastern India, (5) PGF and PERSIANN-CDR are the least situated datasets. Moreover, the present study provides a unique and innovative perspective to characterise the precipitation over a vast topographic, ecologic, and climatic gradient region like India.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度夏季季风期间的降雨事件探测和雨量估算:全面评估不同水文气候区的网格降水数据集
精确的降水估算是水文建模和气候研究的关键。任何地区都有不同的网格降水产品,选择最佳产品对于水文气候建模和分析至关重要。在当前的研究中,我们使用多种连续、分类、图形和基于时间间隔的性能指标,对不同空间和时间分辨率的观测(APHRODITE)、再分析(IMDAA、ERA5-Land、PGF)、卫星(IMERG、CHIRPS、PERSIANN-CDR)和混合(MSWEP)网格降水产品进行了评估,以检测印度夏季季风降雨(ISMR)事件并估算其在印度次大陆的量级,同时将基于 IMD 量表的网格数据作为参考产品。我们的分析仅限于印度次大陆的主要雨季季风季节(即 6 月至 9 月)。由于印度各地监测网络不均匀、稀疏,数据匮乏,基于雨量计的观测数据有限,因此有必要进行网格间比较评估,而不是点到网格的评估。我们提出了一个新的排序框架,以确定降水数据集在 27 个水文气候区(包括同质降雨区、柯本-盖革气候区和主要河流流域)的适用性。综合评估结果表明:(1) APHRODITE、MSWEP 和 ERA5-Land 最接近印度各地的降水事件发生情况;(2) MSWEP 和 ERA5-Land 是区域一级最合适(排名最高)的替代数据集,而 APHRODITE 由于其持续的干旱偏差被认为是下一个合适的数据集;(3) CHIRPS 和 IMERG 在印度各地的排名得分较低;(4) 在半干旱和亚湿润地区(如印度),所研究数据集的一致性非常接近。g.,而ERA5-Land、IMDAA 和 APHRODITE 则无法探测和再现印度西海岸和东北部的事件强度,(5)PGF 和 PERSIANN-CDR 是位置最靠后的数据集。此外,本研究提供了一个独特而创新的视角,来描述印度这样一个广阔的地形、生态和气候梯度地区的降水特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Atmospheric Research
Atmospheric Research 地学-气象与大气科学
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
10.90%
发文量
460
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: The journal publishes scientific papers (research papers, review articles, letters and notes) dealing with the part of the atmosphere where meteorological events occur. Attention is given to all processes extending from the earth surface to the tropopause, but special emphasis continues to be devoted to the physics of clouds, mesoscale meteorology and air pollution, i.e. atmospheric aerosols; microphysical processes; cloud dynamics and thermodynamics; numerical simulation, climatology, climate change and weather modification.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Improving long-term prediction of terrestrial water storage through integration with CMIP6 decadal prediction Relative Impact of Assimilation of Multi-Source Observations using 3D-Var on Simulation of Extreme Rainfall Events over Karnataka, India Recent impact of reduced arctic sea-ice on the winter North Atlantic jet stream and its quantitative contributions compared to pre-industrial level Investigating secondary ice production in a deep convective cloud with a 3D bin microphysics model: Part I - Sensitivity study of microphysical processes representations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1