Guidance for targeted degradation analysis of OER kinetics of low-loading iridium-based catalysts in PEM water electrolysis cells

IF 5.5 3区 材料科学 Q1 ELECTROCHEMISTRY Electrochimica Acta Pub Date : 2024-11-15 DOI:10.1016/j.electacta.2024.145360
Mirjam Rogler, Richard Wagner, Simon Thiele, Michel Suermann
{"title":"Guidance for targeted degradation analysis of OER kinetics of low-loading iridium-based catalysts in PEM water electrolysis cells","authors":"Mirjam Rogler, Richard Wagner, Simon Thiele, Michel Suermann","doi":"10.1016/j.electacta.2024.145360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper critically evaluates three methods for determining metrics of the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) describing the performance and stability of low-loading iridium-based anode catalyst layers (CLs) in proton exchange membrane water electrolysis (PEMWE) cells. The methods applied are OER mass activity, voltage breakdown analysis (VBA), and constant Tafel slope VBA (CT-VBA). They are used to assess the OER metrics as a function of anode CL configurations, potential cycling, and level of degradation. Therefore, various accelerated stress tests (ASTs) are carried out for a targeted degradation of different anode CLs based on Ir black or Ir oxide. It turns out that the OER mass activity method is robust, straightforward and an ideal method for e.g., in-house screening tasks. On the other hand, the VBA method is suitable for comparative analysis across laboratories by distinguishing between the three main overpotentials. The CT-VBA method, however, offers improved accuracy, as it accounts for mass transport overpotential at low current density, and is particularly suitable for determining apparent exchange current density values further used in modelling approaches. This benefit comes with a drawback, as commonly accepted reference Tafel slopes for respective catalyst type and PTL configurations would be required within the PEMWE community. This guidance therefore helps to choose the right method for determining OER metrics depending on the research question.","PeriodicalId":305,"journal":{"name":"Electrochimica Acta","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electrochimica Acta","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2024.145360","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ELECTROCHEMISTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper critically evaluates three methods for determining metrics of the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) describing the performance and stability of low-loading iridium-based anode catalyst layers (CLs) in proton exchange membrane water electrolysis (PEMWE) cells. The methods applied are OER mass activity, voltage breakdown analysis (VBA), and constant Tafel slope VBA (CT-VBA). They are used to assess the OER metrics as a function of anode CL configurations, potential cycling, and level of degradation. Therefore, various accelerated stress tests (ASTs) are carried out for a targeted degradation of different anode CLs based on Ir black or Ir oxide. It turns out that the OER mass activity method is robust, straightforward and an ideal method for e.g., in-house screening tasks. On the other hand, the VBA method is suitable for comparative analysis across laboratories by distinguishing between the three main overpotentials. The CT-VBA method, however, offers improved accuracy, as it accounts for mass transport overpotential at low current density, and is particularly suitable for determining apparent exchange current density values further used in modelling approaches. This benefit comes with a drawback, as commonly accepted reference Tafel slopes for respective catalyst type and PTL configurations would be required within the PEMWE community. This guidance therefore helps to choose the right method for determining OER metrics depending on the research question.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
指导对 PEM 水电解槽中低负载铱基催化剂的 OER 动力学进行有针对性的降解分析
本文对描述质子交换膜水电解(PEMWE)电池中低负载铱基阳极催化剂层(CL)性能和稳定性的氧进化反应(OER)指标的三种测定方法进行了严格评估。应用的方法包括 OER 质量活度、电压击穿分析 (VBA) 和恒定塔菲尔斜率 VBA (CT-VBA)。这些方法用于评估 OER 指标与阳极 CL 配置、电位循环和降解程度的函数关系。因此,对基于黑铱或氧化铱的不同阳极 CL 进行了各种加速应力测试 (AST),以实现有针对性的降解。结果表明,OER 质量活度法既稳健又简单,是内部筛选等任务的理想方法。另一方面,VBA 方法通过区分三种主要过电势,适用于不同实验室之间的比较分析。不过,CT-VBA 方法的准确性更高,因为它考虑了低电流密度下的质量传输过电位,特别适合确定表观交换电流密度值,并进一步用于建模方法。但这一优点也有缺点,因为 PEMWE 社区需要针对各自的催化剂类型和 PTL 配置提供公认的参考塔菲尔斜率。因此,本指南有助于根据研究问题选择正确的方法来确定 OER 指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Electrochimica Acta
Electrochimica Acta 工程技术-电化学
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
6.10%
发文量
1634
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Electrochimica Acta is an international journal. It is intended for the publication of both original work and reviews in the field of electrochemistry. Electrochemistry should be interpreted to mean any of the research fields covered by the Divisions of the International Society of Electrochemistry listed below, as well as emerging scientific domains covered by ISE New Topics Committee.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to the author information of “Solvent-derived inorganic F and N-rich solid electrolyte interface for stable lithium metal batteries” [Electrochimica Acta, Volume 503, 2024, 144909] Facile sulfur chemistry assisted carbon reconfiguration for efficient potassium ion electrochemical storage Effect of ammoniacal thiosulfate solution composition on the gold dissolution rate: An electrochemical study Enhanced Long-Term Stability of Zinc-Air Batteries Using a Quaternized PVA-Chitosan Composite Separator with Thin-Layered MoS2 Guidance for targeted degradation analysis of OER kinetics of low-loading iridium-based catalysts in PEM water electrolysis cells
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1