Vidhu Anand, Hector I Michelena, Christopher G Scott, Alexander T Lee, Vera H Rigolin, Sorin V Pislaru, Garvan C Kane, Juan A Crestanello, Patricia A Pellikka
{"title":"Echocardiographic Markers of Early Left Ventricular Dysfunction in Asymptomatic Aortic Regurgitation: Is It Time to Change the Guidelines?","authors":"Vidhu Anand, Hector I Michelena, Christopher G Scott, Alexander T Lee, Vera H Rigolin, Sorin V Pislaru, Garvan C Kane, Juan A Crestanello, Patricia A Pellikka","doi":"10.1016/j.jcmg.2024.09.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The ideal timing for surgery in asymptomatic chronic aortic regurgitation (AR) remains unclear. New thresholds for left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular (LV) indexed end-systolic volume (iESV), and global longitudinal strain (GLS) have been associated with mortality in these patients. These represent markers of early LV dysfunction.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The authors sought to assess the relationship between these markers (LVEF <60%, iESV ≥45 mL/m<sup>2</sup>, and GLS worse than -15%) and mortality, comparing them to Class I/IIa American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guideline recommendations and absence of any of these.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 673 asymptomatic patients with chronic clinically significant (≥ moderate-severe) AR between 2004 and 2019 at a single referral center were retrospectively analyzed. The primary study outcome was all-cause mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean age was 57 ± 17 years, 97 (14%) were female, 293 (45%) had hypertension, and 273 (41%) had an abnormal number of valve cusps. Aortic valve replacement was performed in 281 (48%) patients, and 69 (10%) died while under surveillance (without aortic valve replacement). LVEF <60% was present in 296 (44%) patients, 122 (25%) of 482 had GLS worse than -15%, and 261 (39%) had iESV ≥45 mL/m<sup>2</sup>. Mortality under surveillance was highest when Class I/IIa recommendations were present (HR: 4.22; 95% CI: 2.15-8.29), followed by the presence of 1 or more markers of early LV dysfunction (HR: 2.18; 95% CI: 1.21-3.92); no markers was used as the reference (all, P < 0.05). LVEF showed the strongest association with mortality, statistically slightly better than GLS and iESV. In the absence of Class I/IIa recommendations, 1 marker of early LV dysfunction was associated with higher, although not statistically significant, mortality compared with no markers (P = 0.063), followed by 2 markers; highest mortality was when all 3 markers were present (HR: 5.46; 95% CI: 2.51-11.90; P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with asymptomatic clinically significant chronic AR incur a survival penalty when Class I/IIa guideline recommendations are attained. In patients without these recommendations, at least 2 markers of early LV dysfunction identify those with higher mortality risk who may benefit from early surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":14767,"journal":{"name":"JACC. Cardiovascular imaging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JACC. Cardiovascular imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2024.09.005","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The ideal timing for surgery in asymptomatic chronic aortic regurgitation (AR) remains unclear. New thresholds for left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular (LV) indexed end-systolic volume (iESV), and global longitudinal strain (GLS) have been associated with mortality in these patients. These represent markers of early LV dysfunction.
Objectives: The authors sought to assess the relationship between these markers (LVEF <60%, iESV ≥45 mL/m2, and GLS worse than -15%) and mortality, comparing them to Class I/IIa American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guideline recommendations and absence of any of these.
Methods: A total of 673 asymptomatic patients with chronic clinically significant (≥ moderate-severe) AR between 2004 and 2019 at a single referral center were retrospectively analyzed. The primary study outcome was all-cause mortality.
Results: Mean age was 57 ± 17 years, 97 (14%) were female, 293 (45%) had hypertension, and 273 (41%) had an abnormal number of valve cusps. Aortic valve replacement was performed in 281 (48%) patients, and 69 (10%) died while under surveillance (without aortic valve replacement). LVEF <60% was present in 296 (44%) patients, 122 (25%) of 482 had GLS worse than -15%, and 261 (39%) had iESV ≥45 mL/m2. Mortality under surveillance was highest when Class I/IIa recommendations were present (HR: 4.22; 95% CI: 2.15-8.29), followed by the presence of 1 or more markers of early LV dysfunction (HR: 2.18; 95% CI: 1.21-3.92); no markers was used as the reference (all, P < 0.05). LVEF showed the strongest association with mortality, statistically slightly better than GLS and iESV. In the absence of Class I/IIa recommendations, 1 marker of early LV dysfunction was associated with higher, although not statistically significant, mortality compared with no markers (P = 0.063), followed by 2 markers; highest mortality was when all 3 markers were present (HR: 5.46; 95% CI: 2.51-11.90; P < 0.001).
Conclusions: Patients with asymptomatic clinically significant chronic AR incur a survival penalty when Class I/IIa guideline recommendations are attained. In patients without these recommendations, at least 2 markers of early LV dysfunction identify those with higher mortality risk who may benefit from early surgery.
期刊介绍:
JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging, part of the prestigious Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC) family, offers readers a comprehensive perspective on all aspects of cardiovascular imaging. This specialist journal covers original clinical research on both non-invasive and invasive imaging techniques, including echocardiography, CT, CMR, nuclear, optical imaging, and cine-angiography.
JACC. Cardiovascular imaging highlights advances in basic science and molecular imaging that are expected to significantly impact clinical practice in the next decade. This influence encompasses improvements in diagnostic performance, enhanced understanding of the pathogenetic basis of diseases, and advancements in therapy.
In addition to cutting-edge research,the content of JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging emphasizes practical aspects for the practicing cardiologist, including advocacy and practice management.The journal also features state-of-the-art reviews, ensuring a well-rounded and insightful resource for professionals in the field of cardiovascular imaging.