Indexing status of orthodontic research published in presumed predatory journals: A bibliometric study

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of dentistry Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105464
Michael P Maroulakos , Dalya Al-Moghrabi , Isabel Fleischmann , Nikolaos Pandis , Padhraig S Fleming
{"title":"Indexing status of orthodontic research published in presumed predatory journals: A bibliometric study","authors":"Michael P Maroulakos ,&nbsp;Dalya Al-Moghrabi ,&nbsp;Isabel Fleischmann ,&nbsp;Nikolaos Pandis ,&nbsp;Padhraig S Fleming","doi":"10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To examine the indexing status of presumed predatory orthodontic publications within established scientific databases.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Six electronic databases were searched to identify English language orthodontic articles published in 2022. Equal numbers of articles from legitimate (<em>n</em> = 159) and suspect or predatory journals (<em>n</em> = 159) were considered. Data regarding journal, article and author characteristics were obtained. The indexing status of the publications in PubMed, Ovid, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus and EBSCOhost was evaluated. The total number of databases that the article was indexed in, level of evidence, origin of first author and research funding were recorded. Univariable ordinal regression analyses were performed to explore potential association between article legitimacy and indexing status.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The majority of studies in predatory journals were found in non-specialized journals (79.6 %). Scopus was the most porous database, indexing over half of predatory and suspect articles (56 %). In Web of Science (Core collection), the distribution of articles across different indexing categories varied (SCIE; 16.4 %, ESCI; 30.2 %). In contrast, only 8.2 % of these articles appeared in Medline. Articles in legitimate journals tended to have higher level of evidence and were indexed in more databases in comparison to predatory/suspect publications (OR = 1.5; 95 % CI: 1.37–1.64; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.01). The origin of the first author was a significant predictor for journal legitimacy (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>A high proportion of orthodontic publications appear in presumed predatory and suspect journals which are in turn often indexed in trustworthy databases. Medline was the least susceptible to predatory publications, while Scopus and ESCI were more prone.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical significance</h3><div>Predatory and suspect journals are increasingly prevalent with increasing prominence being afforded by their penetration through recognized databases.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15585,"journal":{"name":"Journal of dentistry","volume":"153 ","pages":"Article 105464"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0300571224006341","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To examine the indexing status of presumed predatory orthodontic publications within established scientific databases.

Methods

Six electronic databases were searched to identify English language orthodontic articles published in 2022. Equal numbers of articles from legitimate (n = 159) and suspect or predatory journals (n = 159) were considered. Data regarding journal, article and author characteristics were obtained. The indexing status of the publications in PubMed, Ovid, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus and EBSCOhost was evaluated. The total number of databases that the article was indexed in, level of evidence, origin of first author and research funding were recorded. Univariable ordinal regression analyses were performed to explore potential association between article legitimacy and indexing status.

Results

The majority of studies in predatory journals were found in non-specialized journals (79.6 %). Scopus was the most porous database, indexing over half of predatory and suspect articles (56 %). In Web of Science (Core collection), the distribution of articles across different indexing categories varied (SCIE; 16.4 %, ESCI; 30.2 %). In contrast, only 8.2 % of these articles appeared in Medline. Articles in legitimate journals tended to have higher level of evidence and were indexed in more databases in comparison to predatory/suspect publications (OR = 1.5; 95 % CI: 1.37–1.64; p < 0.01). The origin of the first author was a significant predictor for journal legitimacy (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

A high proportion of orthodontic publications appear in presumed predatory and suspect journals which are in turn often indexed in trustworthy databases. Medline was the least susceptible to predatory publications, while Scopus and ESCI were more prone.

Clinical significance

Predatory and suspect journals are increasingly prevalent with increasing prominence being afforded by their penetration through recognized databases.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在假定的掠夺性期刊上发表的正畸研究的索引状况:一项文献计量学研究。
目的研究假定的掠夺性正畸出版物的频率和特征。我们还旨在评估已建立的科学数据库中是否存在此类出版物:搜索了六个电子数据库,以确定 2022 年发表的英语正畸文章。合法期刊(159 篇)和可疑或掠夺性期刊(159 篇)的文章数量相等。我们获得了有关期刊、文章和作者特征的数据。评估了出版物在 PubMed、Ovid、Embase、Web of Science、Scopus 和 EBSCOhost 中的索引情况。记录了文章被收录的数据库总数、证据级别、第一作者来源和研究经费。我们进行了单变量序数回归分析,以探讨文章的合法性与收录情况之间的潜在关联:大部分掠夺性期刊上的研究都发表在非专业期刊上(79.6%)。Scopus 是漏洞最多的数据库,一半以上的掠夺性文章和可疑文章(56%)被 Scopus 索引。在 Web of Science(核心库)中,不同索引类别的文章分布各不相同(SCIE:16.4%;ESCI:30.2%)。相比之下,只有 8.2% 的文章出现在 Medline 中。与掠夺性/可疑性出版物相比,合法期刊上的文章往往具有更高的证据级别,并被更多的数据库收录(OR=1.5;95% CI:1.37-1.64;p结论:很大比例的正畸出版物出现在被认为是掠夺性和可疑的期刊上,而这些期刊通常又被可信的数据库收录。Medline最不容易受到掠夺性出版物的影响,而Web of Science和Scopus则更容易受到影响:临床意义:随着掠夺性期刊和可疑期刊向公认数据库的渗透,这些期刊越来越普遍。我们能够发现相关趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of dentistry
Journal of dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
11.40%
发文量
349
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Dentistry has an open access mirror journal The Journal of Dentistry: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. The Journal of Dentistry is the leading international dental journal within the field of Restorative Dentistry. Placing an emphasis on publishing novel and high-quality research papers, the Journal aims to influence the practice of dentistry at clinician, research, industry and policy-maker level on an international basis. Topics covered include the management of dental disease, periodontology, endodontology, operative dentistry, fixed and removable prosthodontics, dental biomaterials science, long-term clinical trials including epidemiology and oral health, technology transfer of new scientific instrumentation or procedures, as well as clinically relevant oral biology and translational research. The Journal of Dentistry will publish original scientific research papers including short communications. It is also interested in publishing review articles and leaders in themed areas which will be linked to new scientific research. Conference proceedings are also welcome and expressions of interest should be communicated to the Editor.
期刊最新文献
Synthesis and application of calcium cyclotriphosphate in bleaching formulations: effects on dental enamel properties. Adjunctive use of Hyaluronic Acid in non-surgical periodontal therapy: A Systematic review and Meta-analysis. In situ remineralization of enamel caries lesions with a toothpaste supplemented with fluoride, amorphous calcium phosphate casein phosphopeptide and trimetaphosphate. Effect of surface conditioning on the adhesive bond strength of 3D-printed resins used in permanent fixed dental prostheses. Evaluation of the accuracy (trueness, precision) and processing time of different 3-dimensional CAD software programs and algorithms for virtual cast alignment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1