Evaluating the Impact and Cultural Relevance of LifeKeepers Gatekeeper Training Across Three Training Modalities.

Denise Kingi-Ulu'ave, Chris Framptom, Tania Cargo, Karolina Stasiak, Sarah Hetrick
{"title":"Evaluating the Impact and Cultural Relevance of LifeKeepers Gatekeeper Training Across Three Training Modalities.","authors":"Denise Kingi-Ulu'ave, Chris Framptom, Tania Cargo, Karolina Stasiak, Sarah Hetrick","doi":"10.1027/0227-5910/a000977","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b></b> <i>Background</i>: While Gatekeeper Training (GKT) is an accepted component of suicide prevention strategies, there is little evidence about its effectiveness with Indigenous populations and online. <i>Aims</i>: This study examined the effects of LifeKeepers, a novel GKT, comprising three modalities: General, e-learning, and a culturally tailored Māori (New Zealand Indigenous) training. <i>Methods</i>: A total of 5,981 participants completed measures of declarative knowledge, perceived knowledge, and self-efficacy pre- and post-training. Participants rated satisfaction with LifeKeepers, its safety considerations and cultural acceptability post-training. <i>Results</i>: There were statistically significant improvements across all outcome measures (declarative knowledge 1.3 [95% CI 1.3-1.4], perceived knowledge 10.9 [95% CI 10.7-11.1], and self-efficacy 2.5 [95% CI 2.5-2.6]), including across all modalities. More than 90% of participants rated satisfaction, cultural acceptability, and safety considerations highly. <i>Limitations:</i> Without a control group, changes may not be solely due to engagement in LifeKeepers. <i>Conclusions</i>: This study offers preliminary evidence of the immediate effectiveness of LifeKeepers, across its in-person, Indigenous Māori, and e-learning modalities. It addresses a critical literature gap by exploring participants' safety perspectives and strongly supports LifeKeepers as a primary suicide prevention intervention in New Zealand, especially for Indigenous Māori communities. Comparable outcomes for e-learning participants indicate wider accessibility, bolstering suicide prevention efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":47943,"journal":{"name":"Crisis-The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention","volume":"45 6","pages":"417-424"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crisis-The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1027/0227-5910/a000977","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: While Gatekeeper Training (GKT) is an accepted component of suicide prevention strategies, there is little evidence about its effectiveness with Indigenous populations and online. Aims: This study examined the effects of LifeKeepers, a novel GKT, comprising three modalities: General, e-learning, and a culturally tailored Māori (New Zealand Indigenous) training. Methods: A total of 5,981 participants completed measures of declarative knowledge, perceived knowledge, and self-efficacy pre- and post-training. Participants rated satisfaction with LifeKeepers, its safety considerations and cultural acceptability post-training. Results: There were statistically significant improvements across all outcome measures (declarative knowledge 1.3 [95% CI 1.3-1.4], perceived knowledge 10.9 [95% CI 10.7-11.1], and self-efficacy 2.5 [95% CI 2.5-2.6]), including across all modalities. More than 90% of participants rated satisfaction, cultural acceptability, and safety considerations highly. Limitations: Without a control group, changes may not be solely due to engagement in LifeKeepers. Conclusions: This study offers preliminary evidence of the immediate effectiveness of LifeKeepers, across its in-person, Indigenous Māori, and e-learning modalities. It addresses a critical literature gap by exploring participants' safety perspectives and strongly supports LifeKeepers as a primary suicide prevention intervention in New Zealand, especially for Indigenous Māori communities. Comparable outcomes for e-learning participants indicate wider accessibility, bolstering suicide prevention efforts.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过三种培训模式评估 LifeKeepers 守门人培训的影响和文化相关性。
背景:虽然守门人培训(GKT)是自杀预防策略中一个公认的组成部分,但有关其对土著居民和网络的有效性的证据却很少。目的:本研究考察了 LifeKeepers 的效果:一般培训、电子学习培训和针对毛利人(新西兰土著)文化的培训。培训方法共有 5981 名参与者在培训前后完成了陈述性知识、感知知识和自我效能的测量。参与者在培训后对 LifeKeepers 的满意度、安全考虑因素和文化可接受性进行评分。结果:所有结果指标均有统计学意义上的明显改善(陈述性知识 1.3 [95% CI 1.3-1.4],感知性知识 10.9 [95% CI 10.7-11.1],自我效能 2.5 [95% CI 2.5-2.6]),包括所有模式。超过 90% 的参与者对满意度、文化可接受性和安全性给予了高度评价。局限性:由于没有对照组,因此改变可能不完全是参与 LifeKeepers 所带来的。结论:本研究初步证明了 LifeKeepers 的即时有效性,包括面对面学习、土著毛利人学习和电子学习模式。该研究通过探索参与者的安全视角,填补了文献空白,并有力地支持将 "生命守护者 "作为新西兰预防自杀的主要干预措施,尤其是针对土著毛利社区。电子学习参与者的可比结果表明,电子学习具有更广泛的可及性,有助于自杀预防工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
6.70%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: A must for all who need to keep up on the latest findings from both basic research and practical experience in the fields of suicide prevention and crisis intervention! This well-established periodical’s reputation for publishing important articles on suicidology and crisis intervention from around the world is being further enhanced with the move to 6 issues per year (previously 4) in 2010. But over and above its scientific reputation, Crisis also publishes potentially life-saving information for all those involved in crisis intervention and suicide prevention, making it important reading for clinicians, counselors, hotlines, and crisis intervention centers.
期刊最新文献
Perceived Effectiveness of Components of Interventions to Support People Bereaved By Suicide. Exploring the Influence of Masculine Norms on Suicidal Ideation and Help-Seeking Behavior. Substitution of Methods in Suicide Deaths - Firearm Injury and Hanging. Using Real-Time Coronial Data to Detect Spatiotemporal Suicide Clusters. Does Gender Predict Research Productivity? The Case of Prolific Suicidologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1