Effects of different exposures to normobaric hypoxia on cognitive performance in healthy young adults.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Physiology & Behavior Pub Date : 2024-11-14 DOI:10.1016/j.physbeh.2024.114747
María Ramírez-delaCruz , David Ortiz-Sánchez , Alfredo Bravo-Sánchez , Javier Portillo , Paula Esteban-García , Javier Abián-Vicén
{"title":"Effects of different exposures to normobaric hypoxia on cognitive performance in healthy young adults.","authors":"María Ramírez-delaCruz ,&nbsp;David Ortiz-Sánchez ,&nbsp;Alfredo Bravo-Sánchez ,&nbsp;Javier Portillo ,&nbsp;Paula Esteban-García ,&nbsp;Javier Abián-Vicén","doi":"10.1016/j.physbeh.2024.114747","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Normobaric hypoxia has become an innovative non-pharmacological therapy to treat cognitive dysfunction. Nevertheless, the acute effects of exposure to hypoxia on cognitive performance remain unclear. We aimed to determine the effects of different normobaric hypoxic exposures on cognitive function in healthy young adults. Nineteen participants (13 men and 6 women; 23.7 ± 3.9 years; 172.0 ± 8.4 cm; 69.1 ± 12.2 kg) completed a cross-over randomized control trial with the following doses of fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO<sub>2</sub>): a) 21 %, b) 15 %, c) 13 % or d) 11 %. During experimental trials, the physiological response (blood oxygen saturation and heart rate) and the following cognitive abilities were evaluated: memory, sustained attention, anticipation, and reaction time. Sustained attention improved under hypoxia at 15 % FiO<sub>2</sub> (mean difference (MD) 0.024, 95 % confidence intervals (CI) 0.005 to 0.044 s; <em>p =</em> 0.018) compared to 11 % and 21 % FiO<sub>2</sub>. During 11 % and 15 % FiO<sub>2</sub>, participants showed improved anticipation ability compared to normoxia (MD -0.023, 95 % CI -0.042 to -0.003 s, <em>p =</em> 0.020, and MD -0.009, 95 % CI -0.016 to -0.001 s, <em>p =</em> 0.022, respectively). However, reaction time was impaired under 11 % compared to 21 % FiO<sub>2</sub> (MD 0.033, 95 % CI 0.008 to 0.059 s, <em>p =</em> 0.013). Finally, we did not find significant effects of hypoxia on memory (<em>p &gt;</em> 0.05). Severe normobaric hypoxic exposure (11 % FiO<sub>2</sub>) produces detrimental effects on reaction time, although anticipation seems to be improved, compared to normoxia. In addition, cognitive processes of attention and anticipation appear to improve with moderate hypoxic exposure (15 % FiO<sub>2</sub>).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20201,"journal":{"name":"Physiology & Behavior","volume":"288 ","pages":"Article 114747"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiology & Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0031938424002956","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Normobaric hypoxia has become an innovative non-pharmacological therapy to treat cognitive dysfunction. Nevertheless, the acute effects of exposure to hypoxia on cognitive performance remain unclear. We aimed to determine the effects of different normobaric hypoxic exposures on cognitive function in healthy young adults. Nineteen participants (13 men and 6 women; 23.7 ± 3.9 years; 172.0 ± 8.4 cm; 69.1 ± 12.2 kg) completed a cross-over randomized control trial with the following doses of fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2): a) 21 %, b) 15 %, c) 13 % or d) 11 %. During experimental trials, the physiological response (blood oxygen saturation and heart rate) and the following cognitive abilities were evaluated: memory, sustained attention, anticipation, and reaction time. Sustained attention improved under hypoxia at 15 % FiO2 (mean difference (MD) 0.024, 95 % confidence intervals (CI) 0.005 to 0.044 s; p = 0.018) compared to 11 % and 21 % FiO2. During 11 % and 15 % FiO2, participants showed improved anticipation ability compared to normoxia (MD -0.023, 95 % CI -0.042 to -0.003 s, p = 0.020, and MD -0.009, 95 % CI -0.016 to -0.001 s, p = 0.022, respectively). However, reaction time was impaired under 11 % compared to 21 % FiO2 (MD 0.033, 95 % CI 0.008 to 0.059 s, p = 0.013). Finally, we did not find significant effects of hypoxia on memory (p > 0.05). Severe normobaric hypoxic exposure (11 % FiO2) produces detrimental effects on reaction time, although anticipation seems to be improved, compared to normoxia. In addition, cognitive processes of attention and anticipation appear to improve with moderate hypoxic exposure (15 % FiO2).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
常压低氧对健康年轻人认知能力的影响:常压低氧与认知能力。
常压缺氧已成为治疗认知功能障碍的一种创新性非药物疗法。然而,暴露于低氧环境对认知能力的急性影响仍不清楚。我们旨在确定不同的常压缺氧暴露对健康年轻人认知功能的影响。19 名参与者(13 名男性和 6 名女性;23.7±3.9 岁;172.0±8.4 厘米;69.1±12.2 千克)完成了一项交叉随机对照试验,试验中的吸氧分数(FiO2)剂量如下:a) 21%、b) 15%、c) 13% 或 d) 11%。在实验过程中,对生理反应(血氧饱和度和心率)和以下认知能力进行了评估:记忆力、持续注意力、预期和反应时间。与 FiO2 为 11% 和 21% 时相比,在 FiO2 为 15% 的缺氧条件下,持续注意力有所提高(平均差 (MD) 为 0.024,95% 置信区间 (CI) 为 0.005 至 0.044 秒;P=0.018)。与常氧状态相比,在 11% 和 15% FiO2 条件下,参与者的预测能力有所提高(分别为 MD -0.023, 95% CI -0.042 至 -0.003 秒,P=0.020;和 MD -0.009, 95% CI -0.016 至 -0.001 秒,P=0.022)。然而,与 21% 的 FiO2 相比,11% 的 FiO2 会影响反应时间(MD 0.033,95% CI 0.008 至 0.059 秒,P=0.013)。最后,我们没有发现缺氧对记忆力有明显影响(P>0.05)。与常压缺氧相比,严重的常压缺氧暴露(11% FiO2)会对反应时间产生不利影响,但预期能力似乎有所改善。此外,在中度缺氧条件下(15% FiO2),注意力和预期的认知过程似乎有所改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Physiology & Behavior
Physiology & Behavior 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
3.40%
发文量
274
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Physiology & Behavior is aimed at the causal physiological mechanisms of behavior and its modulation by environmental factors. The journal invites original reports in the broad area of behavioral and cognitive neuroscience, in which at least one variable is physiological and the primary emphasis and theoretical context are behavioral. The range of subjects includes behavioral neuroendocrinology, psychoneuroimmunology, learning and memory, ingestion, social behavior, and studies related to the mechanisms of psychopathology. Contemporary reviews and theoretical articles are welcomed and the Editors invite such proposals from interested authors.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to 'Deep learning dives: Predicting anxiety in Zebrafish through novel tank assay analysis' Physiology & Behavior (2024), 114696. The effect of blue light on cognitive function at workplaces: A systematic review. Divergent changes in social stress-induced motivation in male and female mice. Effects of Enriched Environment on Barrel Cortex and Hippocampus Function following Somatosensory Damage in Rat. Intermittent Social Isolation Enhances Social Investigation but Impairs Social Memory in Adult Male Mice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1