Effects of global information on the estimation of point-light walker directions.

IF 2.2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Psychological Research-Psychologische Forschung Pub Date : 2024-11-15 DOI:10.1007/s00426-024-02061-5
Ping Ran, Meng-Ying Sun, Fan-Huan You, Xiao-Yan Zhang, Qi Sun, Qian Sun
{"title":"Effects of global information on the estimation of point-light walker directions.","authors":"Ping Ran, Meng-Ying Sun, Fan-Huan You, Xiao-Yan Zhang, Qi Sun, Qian Sun","doi":"10.1007/s00426-024-02061-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Studies have shown that observers can accurately estimate the point-light walker (PLW) directions and bias their estimates towards the previous directions, exhibiting a serial dependence. Additionally, it has been demonstrated that the inversion of PLWs disrupts their global information and impairs the perception of certain attributes of PLWs. However, it remained unclear whether the global information of PLWs affected the estimation accuracy and serial dependence in the PLW direction estimation. In the current study, participants were presented with either a single or four PLW directions in each trial. In one condition, the PLW was upright; while in another condition, the PLW was inverted. Participants were asked to estimate the direction of the single PLW or the average direction of the four PLWs (i.e., ensemble direction), and each condition was finished by an independent group of participants. The results showed that the estimates of PLW directions were systematically compressed towards the reference direction (0°), showing a reference-attraction bias, and the inversion of the PLWs significantly decreased the estimation accuracy in the ensemble direction perception but not in the single direction perception. Moreover, a stronger serial dependence was observed when four PLWs were presented in previous trials as opposed to just one, and its magnitude was also reduced when the four PLWs were inverted. Therefore, the current study demonstrated the effects of global information on the estimation of PLW directions.</p>","PeriodicalId":48184,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Research-Psychologische Forschung","volume":"89 1","pages":"22"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Research-Psychologische Forschung","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-024-02061-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Studies have shown that observers can accurately estimate the point-light walker (PLW) directions and bias their estimates towards the previous directions, exhibiting a serial dependence. Additionally, it has been demonstrated that the inversion of PLWs disrupts their global information and impairs the perception of certain attributes of PLWs. However, it remained unclear whether the global information of PLWs affected the estimation accuracy and serial dependence in the PLW direction estimation. In the current study, participants were presented with either a single or four PLW directions in each trial. In one condition, the PLW was upright; while in another condition, the PLW was inverted. Participants were asked to estimate the direction of the single PLW or the average direction of the four PLWs (i.e., ensemble direction), and each condition was finished by an independent group of participants. The results showed that the estimates of PLW directions were systematically compressed towards the reference direction (0°), showing a reference-attraction bias, and the inversion of the PLWs significantly decreased the estimation accuracy in the ensemble direction perception but not in the single direction perception. Moreover, a stronger serial dependence was observed when four PLWs were presented in previous trials as opposed to just one, and its magnitude was also reduced when the four PLWs were inverted. Therefore, the current study demonstrated the effects of global information on the estimation of PLW directions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全局信息对估计点光步行者方向的影响。
研究表明,观察者可以准确估计点光步行者(PLW)的方向,并将其估计偏向先前的方向,表现出序列依赖性。此外,研究还表明,点光步行器的反转会破坏其全局信息,并损害对点光步行器某些属性的感知。然而,PLW 的全局信息是否会影响 PLW 方向估计的准确性和序列依赖性仍不清楚。在本研究中,参与者在每次试验中都会看到一个或四个PLW方向。在一种条件下,PLW 是直立的;而在另一种条件下,PLW 是倒立的。参与者被要求估计单个 PLW 的方向或四个 PLW 的平均方向(即集合方向),每个条件都由一组独立的参与者完成。结果表明,对 PLW 方向的估计被系统性地压缩到参考方向(0°),显示出参考-吸引偏差,PLW 的反转显著降低了集合方向感知的估计准确性,而单一方向感知的估计准确性则没有降低。此外,当在之前的试验中出现四个 PLW 而不是只有一个时,会观察到更强的序列依赖性,而当四个 PLW 倒置时,序列依赖性的程度也会降低。因此,本研究证明了全局信息对 PLW 方向估计的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
8.70%
发文量
137
期刊介绍: Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung publishes articles that contribute to a basic understanding of human perception, attention, memory, and action. The Journal is devoted to the dissemination of knowledge based on firm experimental ground, but not to particular approaches or schools of thought. Theoretical and historical papers are welcome to the extent that they serve this general purpose; papers of an applied nature are acceptable if they contribute to basic understanding or serve to bridge the often felt gap between basic and applied research in the field covered by the Journal.
期刊最新文献
Input device matters for measures of behaviour in online experiments. Visuospatial working memory and (free and cued) recall of survey knowledge after environment navigation. Anchoring bias in mental arithmetic. Autonomy-supportive instructional language does not enhance skill acquisition compared to controlling instructional language. Linguistic markedness and body specificity in parity judgments: evidence from a go/no-go task.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1