Technical note: Effects of chemical, radiational, and thermal treatment of bone tissue on material stiffness and anisotropy.

IF 1.7 2区 生物学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY American Journal of Biological Anthropology Pub Date : 2024-11-15 DOI:10.1002/ajpa.25038
Taylor A Polvadore, Grace V Calhoun, David J Daegling
{"title":"Technical note: Effects of chemical, radiational, and thermal treatment of bone tissue on material stiffness and anisotropy.","authors":"Taylor A Polvadore, Grace V Calhoun, David J Daegling","doi":"10.1002/ajpa.25038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We evaluated the effects of four treatments for pathogen inactivation in bone tissue (ethanol storage, formalin fixation, gamma irradiation, and heat treatment via autoclave) on stiffness and anisotropy values in bone samples.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Cortical bone samples from the humerus of 14 bovine specimens were subjected to Knoop microindentation analysis in longitudinal and transverse planes of section and four indenter orientations within each section. From each specimen, individual samples were assigned to one of five treatment conditions: 50% ethanol-saline solution, formalin immersion, gamma irradiation, autoclave, and buffered saline (controls). Each sample was microindented 100 times and the resultant stiffness data were analyzed by a resampled factorial analysis of variance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>First- and second-order interactions as well as main effects of indenter orientation, treatment, and specimen were significant for both transverse and longitudinal sections, with the sole exception that indenter orientation-treatment interaction was nonsignificant for longitudinal sections. Interaction plots reveal that thermal (autoclave) and irradiation treatments depress stiffness values the most, while patterns of indentation stiffness at different orientations are relatively unaffected.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Patterns of anisotropy are relatively unaffected by preservative treatments, but elastic modulus changes are consistent and unambiguous. Formalin and ethanol treatments are most comparable to controls and represent the best preservative media for mechanical testing. These options, however, are likely to be the least effective for ensuring the inactivation or sterilization of potentially contaminated samples.</p>","PeriodicalId":29759,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Biological Anthropology","volume":" ","pages":"e25038"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Biological Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.25038","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: We evaluated the effects of four treatments for pathogen inactivation in bone tissue (ethanol storage, formalin fixation, gamma irradiation, and heat treatment via autoclave) on stiffness and anisotropy values in bone samples.

Materials and methods: Cortical bone samples from the humerus of 14 bovine specimens were subjected to Knoop microindentation analysis in longitudinal and transverse planes of section and four indenter orientations within each section. From each specimen, individual samples were assigned to one of five treatment conditions: 50% ethanol-saline solution, formalin immersion, gamma irradiation, autoclave, and buffered saline (controls). Each sample was microindented 100 times and the resultant stiffness data were analyzed by a resampled factorial analysis of variance.

Results: First- and second-order interactions as well as main effects of indenter orientation, treatment, and specimen were significant for both transverse and longitudinal sections, with the sole exception that indenter orientation-treatment interaction was nonsignificant for longitudinal sections. Interaction plots reveal that thermal (autoclave) and irradiation treatments depress stiffness values the most, while patterns of indentation stiffness at different orientations are relatively unaffected.

Discussion: Patterns of anisotropy are relatively unaffected by preservative treatments, but elastic modulus changes are consistent and unambiguous. Formalin and ethanol treatments are most comparable to controls and represent the best preservative media for mechanical testing. These options, however, are likely to be the least effective for ensuring the inactivation or sterilization of potentially contaminated samples.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
技术说明:骨组织的化学、放射和热处理对材料硬度和各向异性的影响。
目的:我们评估了骨组织中病原体灭活的四种处理方法(乙醇贮存、福尔马林固定、伽马射线照射和高压锅热处理)对骨样本刚度和各向异性值的影响:对 14 个牛标本肱骨的皮质骨样本进行努氏显微压痕分析,分析切片的纵向和横向平面以及每个切片的四个压头方向。每个样本都被分配到五种处理条件之一:50%乙醇-盐溶液、福尔马林浸泡、伽马射线照射、高压灭菌和缓冲生理盐水(对照组)。对每个样本进行 100 次微量压痕,并通过重采样因子方差分析对所得硬度数据进行分析:横向和纵向切片的一阶和二阶交互作用以及压头方向、处理和试样的主效应均显著,唯一的例外是纵向切片的压头方向-处理交互作用不显著。交互图显示,热处理(高压锅)和辐照处理对刚度值的影响最大,而不同方向的压痕刚度模式则相对不受影响:讨论:防腐剂处理对各向异性的影响相对较小,但弹性模量的变化是一致且明确的。福尔马林和乙醇处理与对照组最相似,是机械测试的最佳防腐介质。不过,这些方法在确保对可能受污染的样本进行灭活或消毒方面可能最不有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
In Memoriam: Michael H. Crawford (1939-2024). Issue Information - Table of Contents Cover & Editorial Board Technical note: Effects of chemical, radiational, and thermal treatment of bone tissue on material stiffness and anisotropy. Relative facial width, and its association with canine size and body mass among chimpanzees and bonobos: Implications for understanding facial width-to-height ratio expression among human populations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1