Quantification of breast biopsy clip marker artifact on routine breast MRI sequences: a phantom study.

IF 3.7 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING European Radiology Experimental Pub Date : 2024-11-15 DOI:10.1186/s41747-024-00525-2
Christian Kremser, Leonhard Gruber, Matthias Dietzel, Birgit Amort, Wolfram Santner, Martin Daniaux
{"title":"Quantification of breast biopsy clip marker artifact on routine breast MRI sequences: a phantom study.","authors":"Christian Kremser, Leonhard Gruber, Matthias Dietzel, Birgit Amort, Wolfram Santner, Martin Daniaux","doi":"10.1186/s41747-024-00525-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To investigate the artifact sizes of four common breast clip-markers on a standard breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocol in an in vitro phantom model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using 1.5-T and 3-T whole-body scanners with an 18-channel breast coil, artifact dimensions of four breast biopsy markers in an agarose-gel phantom were measured by two readers on images obtained with the following sequences: T2-weighted fast spin-echo short inversion time fat-suppressed inversion-recovery with magnitude reconstruction (T2-TIRM); T1-weighted spoiled gradient-echo with fat suppression (T1_FL3D), routinely used for dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging; diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), including a readout segmented echo-planar imaging (RESOLVE-DWI) and echo-planar imaging sequence (EPI-DWI). After outlining the artifacts by freehand regions of interest, sagittal and lateral diameters in axial images were measured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Interreader agreement for artifact size quantification was high, depending on the sequence (80.4-94.8%). Overall, the size, shape, and appearance of artifacts depended on clip type and MRI sequence. The artifact size ranged from 5.7 × 8.5 mm<sup>2</sup> to 13.4 × 17.7 mm<sup>2</sup> at 1.5 T and from 6.6 × 8.2 mm<sup>2</sup> to 17.7 × 20.7 mm<sup>2</sup> at 3 T. Clip artifacts were largest on EPI-DWI and RESOLVE-DWI (p ≤ 0.016). In three out of four clips, T2-TIRM showed the smallest artifact (p ≤ 0.002), while in one clip the artifact was smallest on T1_FL3D (p = 0.026). With the exception of one clip in the RESOLVE sequence, all clips showed a decrease in the artifact area from DWI to ADC images (p ≤ 0.037).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Breast clip-marker MRI artifact appearances depend on clip type, field strength, and sequence and may reach a significant size, potentially obscuring smaller lesions and hindering accurate assessment of breast tumors.</p><p><strong>Relevance statement: </strong>Considerable variations in artifact size and characteristics across different breast clips, MRI sequences, and field strengths exist. Awareness of these artifacts and their characteristics is essential to ensure accurate interpretation of scans and appropriate treatment planning.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Awareness of breast clip artifacts is essential for accurate interpretation of MRI. The appearance of artifacts depends on breast clip type, field strength, and sequence. Clip-related artifacts might hinder the visibility of small lesions.</p>","PeriodicalId":36926,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology Experimental","volume":"8 1","pages":"128"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11568078/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Radiology Experimental","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41747-024-00525-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To investigate the artifact sizes of four common breast clip-markers on a standard breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocol in an in vitro phantom model.

Methods: Using 1.5-T and 3-T whole-body scanners with an 18-channel breast coil, artifact dimensions of four breast biopsy markers in an agarose-gel phantom were measured by two readers on images obtained with the following sequences: T2-weighted fast spin-echo short inversion time fat-suppressed inversion-recovery with magnitude reconstruction (T2-TIRM); T1-weighted spoiled gradient-echo with fat suppression (T1_FL3D), routinely used for dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging; diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), including a readout segmented echo-planar imaging (RESOLVE-DWI) and echo-planar imaging sequence (EPI-DWI). After outlining the artifacts by freehand regions of interest, sagittal and lateral diameters in axial images were measured.

Results: Interreader agreement for artifact size quantification was high, depending on the sequence (80.4-94.8%). Overall, the size, shape, and appearance of artifacts depended on clip type and MRI sequence. The artifact size ranged from 5.7 × 8.5 mm2 to 13.4 × 17.7 mm2 at 1.5 T and from 6.6 × 8.2 mm2 to 17.7 × 20.7 mm2 at 3 T. Clip artifacts were largest on EPI-DWI and RESOLVE-DWI (p ≤ 0.016). In three out of four clips, T2-TIRM showed the smallest artifact (p ≤ 0.002), while in one clip the artifact was smallest on T1_FL3D (p = 0.026). With the exception of one clip in the RESOLVE sequence, all clips showed a decrease in the artifact area from DWI to ADC images (p ≤ 0.037).

Conclusion: Breast clip-marker MRI artifact appearances depend on clip type, field strength, and sequence and may reach a significant size, potentially obscuring smaller lesions and hindering accurate assessment of breast tumors.

Relevance statement: Considerable variations in artifact size and characteristics across different breast clips, MRI sequences, and field strengths exist. Awareness of these artifacts and their characteristics is essential to ensure accurate interpretation of scans and appropriate treatment planning.

Key points: Awareness of breast clip artifacts is essential for accurate interpretation of MRI. The appearance of artifacts depends on breast clip type, field strength, and sequence. Clip-related artifacts might hinder the visibility of small lesions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
常规乳腺 MRI 序列上乳腺活检夹标记伪影的量化:一项模型研究。
背景:在体外模型中研究标准乳腺磁共振成像(MRI)方案中四种常见乳腺夹标记物的伪影大小:目的:在体外模型中研究标准乳腺磁共振成像(MRI)方案中四种常见乳腺夹标记物的伪影尺寸:方法:使用配备 18 通道乳腺线圈的 1.5-T 和 3-T 全身扫描仪,由两名读片员在以下序列获得的图像上测量琼脂糖凝胶模型中四种乳腺活检标记物的伪影尺寸:T2加权快速自旋回波短反转时间脂肪抑制反转恢复与幅度重建(T2-TIRM);T1加权破坏梯度回波与脂肪抑制(T1_FL3D),常规用于动态对比增强成像;扩散加权成像(DWI),包括读出分割回声平面成像(RESOLVE-DWI)和回声平面成像序列(EPI-DWI)。通过自由手绘感兴趣区勾勒出伪影轮廓后,测量轴向图像的矢状和侧向直径:结果:根据序列的不同,读片者之间对伪影大小量化的一致性很高(80.4%-94.8%)。总体而言,伪影的大小、形状和外观取决于夹片类型和磁共振成像序列。在 1.5 T 下,伪影大小从 5.7 × 8.5 mm2 到 13.4 × 17.7 mm2 不等,在 3 T 下,伪影大小从 6.6 × 8.2 mm2 到 17.7 × 20.7 mm2 不等。夹片伪影在 EPI-DWI 和 RESOLVE-DWI 中最大(p ≤ 0.016)。在四个片段中的三个片段中,T2-TIRM 显示的伪影最小(p ≤ 0.002),而在一个片段中,T1_FL3D 显示的伪影最小(p = 0.026)。除RESOLVE序列中的一个片段外,所有片段的伪影面积从DWI图像到ADC图像均有所减少(p≤0.037):结论:乳腺片段标记 MRI 伪影的出现取决于片段类型、磁场强度和序列,并可能达到相当大的尺寸,可能会遮挡较小的病灶,妨碍对乳腺肿瘤的准确评估:不同的乳腺片段、磁共振成像序列和磁场强度在伪影大小和特征方面存在相当大的差异。了解这些伪影及其特征对于确保准确解读扫描结果和制定适当的治疗计划至关重要:要点:认识乳房夹伪影对准确解读核磁共振成像至关重要。伪影的出现取决于乳夹类型、磁场强度和序列。与乳夹相关的伪影可能会影响小病灶的可见度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Radiology Experimental
European Radiology Experimental Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
56
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
An AI deep learning algorithm for detecting pulmonary nodules on ultra-low-dose CT in an emergency setting: a reader study. Evaluation of pulmonary artery pressure, blood indices, and myocardial microcirculation in rats returning from high altitude to moderate altitude. Image biomarkers and explainable AI: handcrafted features versus deep learned features. Technical feasibility of automated blur detection in digital mammography using convolutional neural network. Quantification of breast biopsy clip marker artifact on routine breast MRI sequences: a phantom study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1