Does Experience of Vaccination Improve Vaccine Confidence and Trust? Policy Feedback Effects of Mass COVID-19 Vaccination in the United States.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law Pub Date : 2024-11-15 DOI:10.1215/03616878-11670176
Yongjin Choi, Ashley Fox
{"title":"Does Experience of Vaccination Improve Vaccine Confidence and Trust? Policy Feedback Effects of Mass COVID-19 Vaccination in the United States.","authors":"Yongjin Choi, Ashley Fox","doi":"10.1215/03616878-11670176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Policy feedback research has demonstrated that a highly tangible policy that shapes public attitudes through direct and day-to-day experiences often reshapes public opinion, with the effect of generating supportive or skeptical constituencies that determine the sustainability of future programs. This paper examines the impact of mass vaccination efforts on attitudes towards vaccines in a context of high vaccine hesitancy in the U.S.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed 73,092 survey responses from 9,229 participants in the longitudinal data from the Understanding America Study project, covering December 2020 to July 2023. Using two-way fixed-effects ordinary least squares regression and ordinal logistic regression, we estimated the changes in attitudes towards vaccines, including trust in vaccine manufacturing and approval processes, following COVID-19 vaccinations.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>COVID-19 vaccination was associated with improved perceptions of vaccine effectiveness and social benefits and reduced mistrust in vaccine-related processes. However, it did not significantly alleviate concerns regarding vaccine side effects and illness. The strongest effects were observed among respondents initially hesitant but who eventually vaccinated.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The experience of COVID-19 vaccination generally improved attitudes and confidence in COVID-19 vaccines among the U.S. public, particularly among vaccine-hesitant people. These effects could have positive impacts on future immunization programs by mitigating vaccine hesitancy.</p>","PeriodicalId":54812,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-11670176","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Policy feedback research has demonstrated that a highly tangible policy that shapes public attitudes through direct and day-to-day experiences often reshapes public opinion, with the effect of generating supportive or skeptical constituencies that determine the sustainability of future programs. This paper examines the impact of mass vaccination efforts on attitudes towards vaccines in a context of high vaccine hesitancy in the U.S.

Methods: We analyzed 73,092 survey responses from 9,229 participants in the longitudinal data from the Understanding America Study project, covering December 2020 to July 2023. Using two-way fixed-effects ordinary least squares regression and ordinal logistic regression, we estimated the changes in attitudes towards vaccines, including trust in vaccine manufacturing and approval processes, following COVID-19 vaccinations.

Findings: COVID-19 vaccination was associated with improved perceptions of vaccine effectiveness and social benefits and reduced mistrust in vaccine-related processes. However, it did not significantly alleviate concerns regarding vaccine side effects and illness. The strongest effects were observed among respondents initially hesitant but who eventually vaccinated.

Conclusions: The experience of COVID-19 vaccination generally improved attitudes and confidence in COVID-19 vaccines among the U.S. public, particularly among vaccine-hesitant people. These effects could have positive impacts on future immunization programs by mitigating vaccine hesitancy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
接种疫苗的经历是否会增强对疫苗的信心和信任?美国大规模接种 COVID-19 疫苗的政策反馈效应。
背景:政策反馈研究表明,一项通过直接和日常经验影响公众态度的高度有形的政策往往会重塑公众舆论,从而产生决定未来计划可持续性的支持或怀疑群体。本文探讨了在美国疫苗接种犹豫不决的背景下,大规模疫苗接种工作对疫苗态度的影响:我们分析了 "了解美国研究"(Understanding America Study)项目纵向数据中 9,229 名参与者的 73,092 份调查回复,时间跨度为 2020 年 12 月至 2023 年 7 月。利用双向固定效应普通最小二乘法回归和序数逻辑回归,我们估算了接种 COVID-19 疫苗后人们对疫苗态度的变化,包括对疫苗生产和审批流程的信任度:结果:接种 COVID-19 疫苗后,人们对疫苗有效性和社会效益的看法有所改善,对疫苗相关程序的不信任度也有所降低。然而,接种COVID-19并没有明显减轻人们对疫苗副作用和疾病的担忧。在最初犹豫不决但最终还是接种了疫苗的受访者中观察到的效果最强:结论:接种 COVID-19 疫苗的经历普遍改善了美国公众对 COVID-19 疫苗的态度和信心,尤其是对疫苗犹豫不决的人。这些效果可以减轻疫苗接种的犹豫不决,从而对未来的免疫计划产生积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
46
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: A leading journal in its field, and the primary source of communication across the many disciplines it serves, the Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law focuses on the initiation, formulation, and implementation of health policy and analyzes the relations between government and health—past, present, and future.
期刊最新文献
Explaining Political Differences in Attitudes to Vaccines in France: Partisan Cues, Disenchantment with Politics, and Political Sophistication. Implementing Primary Care Reform in France: Bargaining, Policy Adaptation, and the Maisons de Santé Pluriprofessionnelles. Policy Feedback and the Politics of Childhood Vaccine Mandates: Conflict and Change in California, 2012-2019. Regime Type and Data Manipulation: Evidence from the COVID-19 Pandemic. Why Some Nonelderly Adult Medicaid Enrollees Appear Ineligible Based on Their Annual Income.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1