Genomic Prediction Using Imputed Whole-Genome Sequence Data in Australian Angus Cattle.

IF 1.9 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics Pub Date : 2024-11-15 DOI:10.1111/jbg.12912
Nantapong Kamprasert, Hassan Aliloo, Julius H J van der Werf, Christian J Duff, Samuel A Clark
{"title":"Genomic Prediction Using Imputed Whole-Genome Sequence Data in Australian Angus Cattle.","authors":"Nantapong Kamprasert, Hassan Aliloo, Julius H J van der Werf, Christian J Duff, Samuel A Clark","doi":"10.1111/jbg.12912","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Whole-genome sequence (WGS) data was used to estimate genomic breeding values for growth and carcass traits in Australian Angus cattle. The study aimed to compare the accuracy and bias of genomic predictions with three marker densities, including 50K, high-density (HD) and WGS. The dataset used in this study consisted of animals born between 2013 and 2022. Body weight traits included birthweight, weight at 400 days and weight at 600 days of age. The carcass traits were carcass weight, carcass intramuscular fat and carcass marbling score. The accuracy and bias of prediction were assessed using the cross-validation. Further, for the growth traits, animals in the validation group were subdivided into two subgroups, which were moderately or highly related to the reference. Genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) was used to compare genomic predictions with the three marker densities. The prediction accuracies were generally similar across the marker densities, ranging between 0.61 and 0.68 for the body weight traits and between 0.40 and 0.52 for the carcass traits. However, the accuracies marginally decreased as the marker density increased for all the traits studied. A similar lack of difference was found when considering the accuracy by the relatedness subgroups. The results indicated that no meaningful difference in prediction accuracy was estimated when comparing the three marker densities due to the population structure. In conclusion, there was no substantial improvement in genomic prediction when using the WGS in this study.</p>","PeriodicalId":54885,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jbg.12912","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Whole-genome sequence (WGS) data was used to estimate genomic breeding values for growth and carcass traits in Australian Angus cattle. The study aimed to compare the accuracy and bias of genomic predictions with three marker densities, including 50K, high-density (HD) and WGS. The dataset used in this study consisted of animals born between 2013 and 2022. Body weight traits included birthweight, weight at 400 days and weight at 600 days of age. The carcass traits were carcass weight, carcass intramuscular fat and carcass marbling score. The accuracy and bias of prediction were assessed using the cross-validation. Further, for the growth traits, animals in the validation group were subdivided into two subgroups, which were moderately or highly related to the reference. Genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) was used to compare genomic predictions with the three marker densities. The prediction accuracies were generally similar across the marker densities, ranging between 0.61 and 0.68 for the body weight traits and between 0.40 and 0.52 for the carcass traits. However, the accuracies marginally decreased as the marker density increased for all the traits studied. A similar lack of difference was found when considering the accuracy by the relatedness subgroups. The results indicated that no meaningful difference in prediction accuracy was estimated when comparing the three marker densities due to the population structure. In conclusion, there was no substantial improvement in genomic prediction when using the WGS in this study.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用推算的澳大利亚安格斯牛全基因组序列数据进行基因组预测。
全基因组序列(WGS)数据用于估算澳大利亚安格斯牛生长和胴体性状的基因组育种值。该研究旨在比较使用三种标记密度(包括 50K、高密度 (HD) 和 WGS)进行基因组预测的准确性和偏差。本研究使用的数据集由 2013 年至 2022 年间出生的动物组成。体重性状包括出生体重、400日龄体重和600日龄体重。胴体性状包括胴体重量、胴体肌内脂肪和胴体大理石花纹评分。使用交叉验证评估了预测的准确性和偏差。此外,就生长性状而言,验证组中的动物被细分为两个亚组,它们与参照物的关系为中度或高度相关。基因组最佳线性无偏预测(GBLUP)用于比较三种标记密度的基因组预测结果。不同标记密度的预测准确率基本相似,体重性状的预测准确率介于 0.61 和 0.68 之间,胴体性状的预测准确率介于 0.40 和 0.52 之间。然而,随着标记密度的增加,所有研究性状的准确度都略有下降。在考虑亲缘关系亚组的准确度时也发现了类似的差异。结果表明,由于种群结构的原因,在比较三种标记密度时,预测准确率没有明显差异。总之,在本研究中使用 WGS 对基因组预测没有实质性的改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics
Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.80%
发文量
58
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics publishes original articles by international scientists on genomic selection, and any other topic related to breeding programmes, selection, quantitative genetic, genomics, diversity and evolution of domestic animals. Researchers, teachers, and the animal breeding industry will find the reports of interest. Book reviews appear in many issues.
期刊最新文献
The Effect of Preselection on the Level of Bias and Accuracy in a Broiler Breeder Population, a Simulation Study. Genomic Prediction Using Imputed Whole-Genome Sequence Data in Australian Angus Cattle. Genetic Characterisation of Feeding Patterns in Lactating Holstein Cows and Their Association With Feed Efficiency Traits. Methods of Calculating Prediction Error Variance and Prediction Accuracy for Restricted Best Linear Unbiased Prediction of Breeding Values. Are SNPs Linked to Somatic Cell Score Suitable Markers for the Susceptibility to Specific Mastitis Pathogens in Holstein Cows?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1