Comparing arterial catheterisation by palpation or ultrasound guidance by novice nurses in an adult intensive care unit: A prospective cohort study.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Australian Critical Care Pub Date : 2024-11-15 DOI:10.1016/j.aucc.2024.101135
Manuela León, Daniel N Marco, Marta Cubedo, Cristina González, Ana Guirao, María Del Carmen Cañueto, Laura Salvador, Àlvar Farré, Javier Pérez, Inmaculada Carmona, Pamela-Inés Doti, Sara Fernández, Adrián Téllez, Juan Carlos López-Delgado, Eric Mayor-Vázquez, Laura Almorín, Josep M Nicolás, Pedro Castro
{"title":"Comparing arterial catheterisation by palpation or ultrasound guidance by novice nurses in an adult intensive care unit: A prospective cohort study.","authors":"Manuela León, Daniel N Marco, Marta Cubedo, Cristina González, Ana Guirao, María Del Carmen Cañueto, Laura Salvador, Àlvar Farré, Javier Pérez, Inmaculada Carmona, Pamela-Inés Doti, Sara Fernández, Adrián Téllez, Juan Carlos López-Delgado, Eric Mayor-Vázquez, Laura Almorín, Josep M Nicolás, Pedro Castro","doi":"10.1016/j.aucc.2024.101135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Arterial catheterisation is a common procedure in intensive care units (ICUs), typically performed using the palpation technique. Ultrasound (US)-guided catheterisation remains underutilised, particularly when performed by nonphysician operators.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of US-guided arterial catheterisation performed by nurses in critically ill patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective cohort study took place in a medical ICU at a tertiary university hospital, comparing outcomes before and after a training program. Critically ill patients requiring arterial catheterisation were included. The study examined the performance and complications associated with two catheterisation techniques used by critical care nurses: palpation (PP) and US-guided. Nurses inexperienced with the US technique completed a brief training program consisting of two 3-h workshops followed by supervised clinical practice before performing the procedure. Collected data included the first-attempt success rate (primary endpoint), overall success rate, procedure time, the number of attempts, the number of cannulas used, complication rate, and catheter durability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 175 patients, with 89 in the PP group and 86 in the US group. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. The first-attempt success rate was 50% in the PP group and 58% in the US group (p = 0.39, 95% confidence interval -23.4% to +8.3%). No significant differences were observed between groups in terms of failed attempts (21.3% vs. 14%, p = 0.28), procedure time (284 s vs 350 s, p = 0.44), or rates of immediate (haematoma) and late (catheter infection or dysfunction) complications. Catheter durability was also comparable. Although radial artery cannulation was preferred in both groups, femoral and brachial access were more frequently used in the US group (12.9% and 2.9% vs. 17.6% and 14.9%, respectively, p = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Arterial catheterisation using US guidance, performed by nurses with limited prior experience after a brief training course, demonstrated similar performance and complications rates compared to the traditional PP technique in a medical ICU setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":51239,"journal":{"name":"Australian Critical Care","volume":" ","pages":"101135"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aucc.2024.101135","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Arterial catheterisation is a common procedure in intensive care units (ICUs), typically performed using the palpation technique. Ultrasound (US)-guided catheterisation remains underutilised, particularly when performed by nonphysician operators.

Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of US-guided arterial catheterisation performed by nurses in critically ill patients.

Methods: This prospective cohort study took place in a medical ICU at a tertiary university hospital, comparing outcomes before and after a training program. Critically ill patients requiring arterial catheterisation were included. The study examined the performance and complications associated with two catheterisation techniques used by critical care nurses: palpation (PP) and US-guided. Nurses inexperienced with the US technique completed a brief training program consisting of two 3-h workshops followed by supervised clinical practice before performing the procedure. Collected data included the first-attempt success rate (primary endpoint), overall success rate, procedure time, the number of attempts, the number of cannulas used, complication rate, and catheter durability.

Results: The study included 175 patients, with 89 in the PP group and 86 in the US group. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. The first-attempt success rate was 50% in the PP group and 58% in the US group (p = 0.39, 95% confidence interval -23.4% to +8.3%). No significant differences were observed between groups in terms of failed attempts (21.3% vs. 14%, p = 0.28), procedure time (284 s vs 350 s, p = 0.44), or rates of immediate (haematoma) and late (catheter infection or dysfunction) complications. Catheter durability was also comparable. Although radial artery cannulation was preferred in both groups, femoral and brachial access were more frequently used in the US group (12.9% and 2.9% vs. 17.6% and 14.9%, respectively, p = 0.02).

Conclusions: Arterial catheterisation using US guidance, performed by nurses with limited prior experience after a brief training course, demonstrated similar performance and complications rates compared to the traditional PP technique in a medical ICU setting.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
成人重症监护病房新手护士通过触诊或超声引导进行动脉导管插入术的比较:前瞻性队列研究。
背景:动脉导管插入术是重症监护病房(ICU)的常见手术,通常采用触诊技术。超声(US)引导下的导管插入术仍未得到充分利用,尤其是由非医生操作人员进行时:本研究旨在评估护士在重症患者中进行 US 引导动脉导管插入术的有效性:这项前瞻性队列研究在一家三级大学医院的内科重症监护室进行,比较了培训计划前后的结果。研究对象包括需要进行动脉导管插入术的重症患者。研究考察了重症监护护士使用的两种导管插入技术:触诊(PP)和 US 引导技术的性能和相关并发症。对 US 技术缺乏经验的护士在实施手术前要完成一个简短的培训计划,包括两个为期 3 小时的讲习班,然后在指导下进行临床实践。收集的数据包括首次尝试成功率(主要终点)、总体成功率、手术时间、尝试次数、插管使用次数、并发症发生率和导管耐用性:研究共纳入 175 名患者,其中 PP 组 89 人,US 组 86 人。两组的基线特征相似。PP 组的首次尝试成功率为 50%,US 组为 58%(P = 0.39,95% 置信区间为 -23.4% 至 +8.3%)。在尝试失败率(21.3% 对 14%,p = 0.28)、手术时间(284 秒对 350 秒,p = 0.44)、即刻并发症(血肿)和后期并发症(导管感染或功能障碍)发生率方面,两组之间没有明显差异。导管的耐用性也相当。虽然两组患者都更倾向于桡动脉插管,但美国组更经常使用股动脉和肱动脉入路(分别为 12.9% 和 2.9% 对 17.6% 和 14.9%,p = 0.02):结论:在内科重症监护室环境中,由经验有限的护士在简短培训课程后使用 US 引导进行动脉导管插入术,其效果和并发症发生率与传统的 PP 技术相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Critical Care
Australian Critical Care NURSING-NURSING
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
148
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australian Critical Care is the official journal of the Australian College of Critical Care Nurses (ACCCN). It is a bi-monthly peer-reviewed journal, providing clinically relevant research, reviews and articles of interest to the critical care community. Australian Critical Care publishes peer-reviewed scholarly papers that report research findings, research-based reviews, discussion papers and commentaries which are of interest to an international readership of critical care practitioners, educators, administrators and researchers. Interprofessional articles are welcomed.
期刊最新文献
Digital health interventions to improve recovery for intensive care unit survivors: A systematic review. Barriers and facilitators in implementing intra-abdominal pressure measurement by nurses in paediatric intensive care units: A qualitative study. Comparing arterial catheterisation by palpation or ultrasound guidance by novice nurses in an adult intensive care unit: A prospective cohort study. Blood pressure management in acute spinal cord injury: A retrospective study of acute intensive care management of traumatic spinal cord injury in two New South Wales referral centres. Does intracranial pressure vary based on external ventricular drainage? A real-world clinical observation study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1