Respective Advantages of Growing Different Green Manure With Nitrogen Fertilization in Cotton-Based Cropping Systems: Insights From a Three-Year Field Study

IF 4 2区 农林科学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Food and Energy Security Pub Date : 2024-11-12 DOI:10.1002/fes3.70015
Zhenggui Zhang, Jian Wang, Weibin Huang, Yingchun Han, Guoping Wang, Lu Feng, Xiaofei Li, Shiwu Xiong, Minghua Xin, Yabing Li, Zhanbiao Wang
{"title":"Respective Advantages of Growing Different Green Manure With Nitrogen Fertilization in Cotton-Based Cropping Systems: Insights From a Three-Year Field Study","authors":"Zhenggui Zhang,&nbsp;Jian Wang,&nbsp;Weibin Huang,&nbsp;Yingchun Han,&nbsp;Guoping Wang,&nbsp;Lu Feng,&nbsp;Xiaofei Li,&nbsp;Shiwu Xiong,&nbsp;Minghua Xin,&nbsp;Yabing Li,&nbsp;Zhanbiao Wang","doi":"10.1002/fes3.70015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Planting green manure to improve cash crop yield and soil health has been widely recognized, and understanding cash crop performance after green manure integration is pivotal for determining its potential to bolster and enhance crop productivity and sustainable production. However, it is unclear whether the effects of different types of green manure on subsequent cash crops are uniform. In order to clarify this issue, we systematically analyzed the effects of green manure types and nitrogen (N) application rates on succeeding cotton agronomic performance, yield, biomass, yield stability, and nutrient uptake. A split-plot experiment with two factors was designed, main factor includes four cover cropping systems monoculture cotton (MC), February orchid/cotton cover cropping (FoC), hairy vetch/cotton cover cropping (HvC), and a mixture of February orchid and hairy vetch/cotton cover cropping (FHC), and sub-main factor include four N application levels (0 (N0), 112.5 (N1), 168.75 (N2), and 225 (N3) kg N ha<sup>−1</sup>). Results suggests that nonlegume green manure (February orchid) accumulated more biomass, N, P, and K nutrients than the legume green manure (hairy vetch) and green manure mixture. Compared with cotton yield of MC, the FoC, HvC, and FHC system increased by 5.8%, 7.6%, and 15%, respectively. N use efficiency was more significantly influenced by the N application rates than by cropping systems. Specifically, as N application rates increased, N use efficiency decreased under MC, HvC, and FHC systems, while it increased under the FoC system. Additionally, we observed a trade-off between cotton yield and yield stability, with the highest yield stability when cotton yield reached 2633 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>. This study provides evidence that nonlegume green manure (February orchid) with greater advantages on cotton vegetative organ growth, legume green manure (hairy vetch) can promote nutrient uptake compared to other green manure, while green manure mixture (February orchid and hairy vetch mixture) significantly increased cotton yield and yield stability. These findings provide evidence-based insights highlighting the respective benefits of incorporating diverse species of green manure into cotton-based cropping systems in the Yellow River Basin of China.</p>","PeriodicalId":54283,"journal":{"name":"Food and Energy Security","volume":"13 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fes3.70015","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food and Energy Security","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fes3.70015","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Planting green manure to improve cash crop yield and soil health has been widely recognized, and understanding cash crop performance after green manure integration is pivotal for determining its potential to bolster and enhance crop productivity and sustainable production. However, it is unclear whether the effects of different types of green manure on subsequent cash crops are uniform. In order to clarify this issue, we systematically analyzed the effects of green manure types and nitrogen (N) application rates on succeeding cotton agronomic performance, yield, biomass, yield stability, and nutrient uptake. A split-plot experiment with two factors was designed, main factor includes four cover cropping systems monoculture cotton (MC), February orchid/cotton cover cropping (FoC), hairy vetch/cotton cover cropping (HvC), and a mixture of February orchid and hairy vetch/cotton cover cropping (FHC), and sub-main factor include four N application levels (0 (N0), 112.5 (N1), 168.75 (N2), and 225 (N3) kg N ha−1). Results suggests that nonlegume green manure (February orchid) accumulated more biomass, N, P, and K nutrients than the legume green manure (hairy vetch) and green manure mixture. Compared with cotton yield of MC, the FoC, HvC, and FHC system increased by 5.8%, 7.6%, and 15%, respectively. N use efficiency was more significantly influenced by the N application rates than by cropping systems. Specifically, as N application rates increased, N use efficiency decreased under MC, HvC, and FHC systems, while it increased under the FoC system. Additionally, we observed a trade-off between cotton yield and yield stability, with the highest yield stability when cotton yield reached 2633 kg ha−1. This study provides evidence that nonlegume green manure (February orchid) with greater advantages on cotton vegetative organ growth, legume green manure (hairy vetch) can promote nutrient uptake compared to other green manure, while green manure mixture (February orchid and hairy vetch mixture) significantly increased cotton yield and yield stability. These findings provide evidence-based insights highlighting the respective benefits of incorporating diverse species of green manure into cotton-based cropping systems in the Yellow River Basin of China.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在棉花种植系统中种植不同绿肥并施用氮肥的各自优势:三年田间研究的启示
种植绿肥以提高经济作物产量和改善土壤健康已得到广泛认可,而了解绿肥整合后经济作物的表现对于确定其促进和提高作物生产力和可持续生产的潜力至关重要。然而,目前还不清楚不同类型的绿肥对后续经济作物的影响是否一致。为了澄清这一问题,我们系统分析了绿肥类型和氮肥施用量对棉花后续农艺表现、产量、生物量、产量稳定性和养分吸收的影响。试验设计了两个因子的小区试验,主因子包括单作棉花(MC)、二月兰/棉花覆盖种植(FoC)、毛茸茸的薇菜/棉花覆盖种植(HvC)以及二月兰和毛茸茸的薇菜/棉花混合覆盖种植(FHC)四种覆盖种植系统,副主因子包括四种施氮水平(0(N0)、112.5(N1)、168.75(N2)和 225(N3)千克/公顷)。结果表明,非豆科绿肥(二月兰)比豆科绿肥(毛缕草)和绿肥混合物积累了更多的生物量、氮、磷和钾养分。与 MC 棉花产量相比,FoC、HvC 和 FHC 系统分别增加了 5.8%、7.6% 和 15%。与种植制度相比,氮肥施用量对氮肥利用率的影响更为明显。具体来说,随着氮肥施用量的增加,MC、HvC 和 FHC 系统的氮肥利用率下降,而 FoC 系统的氮肥利用率上升。此外,我们还观察到棉花产量和产量稳定性之间的权衡,当棉花产量达到 2633 千克/公顷时,产量稳定性最高。本研究提供的证据表明,与其他绿肥相比,非豆科绿肥(二月兰)对棉花无性器官生长具有更大的优势,豆科绿肥(毛茸茸的野豌豆)能促进养分吸收,而绿肥混合物(二月兰和毛茸茸的野豌豆混合物)能显著提高棉花产量和产量稳定性。这些研究结果提供了基于证据的见解,强调了在中国黄河流域以棉花为基础的种植系统中施用不同种类绿肥的各自益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Food and Energy Security
Food and Energy Security Energy-Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
4.00%
发文量
76
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: Food and Energy Security seeks to publish high quality and high impact original research on agricultural crop and forest productivity to improve food and energy security. It actively seeks submissions from emerging countries with expanding agricultural research communities. Papers from China, other parts of Asia, India and South America are particularly welcome. The Editorial Board, headed by Editor-in-Chief Professor Martin Parry, is determined to make FES the leading publication in its sector and will be aiming for a top-ranking impact factor. Primary research articles should report hypothesis driven investigations that provide new insights into mechanisms and processes that determine productivity and properties for exploitation. Review articles are welcome but they must be critical in approach and provide particularly novel and far reaching insights. Food and Energy Security offers authors a forum for the discussion of the most important advances in this field and promotes an integrative approach of scientific disciplines. Papers must contribute substantially to the advancement of knowledge. Examples of areas covered in Food and Energy Security include: • Agronomy • Biotechnological Approaches • Breeding & Genetics • Climate Change • Quality and Composition • Food Crops and Bioenergy Feedstocks • Developmental, Physiology and Biochemistry • Functional Genomics • Molecular Biology • Pest and Disease Management • Post Harvest Biology • Soil Science • Systems Biology
期刊最新文献
Does Adoption of Multiple Climate-Smart Agriculture Practices Improve Rural Farm Households' Food Security in Ethiopia? Food Security Status and Associated Drivers Among Climate Migrant Households in Bangladesh: Insight From Urban Informal Settlements Respective Advantages of Growing Different Green Manure With Nitrogen Fertilization in Cotton-Based Cropping Systems: Insights From a Three-Year Field Study Assessment of Sustainability in the Supply Chain of Sweet Red Pepper Paste Production With Exergy and Life Cycle Analyses Wheat Straw Incorporation Coupled With Direct Seeding Method Influence Nitrogen Uptake and Translocation in Rice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1