Bilquees Bozdar, Nazir Ahmed, Mehtab Rai Meghwar, Zhengjie Zhu, Afifa Talpur, Zhen Hua Li
Seed pelleting is an emerging precision-agriculture technology that transforms small or irregular seeds into uniform units to enhance mechanical sowing, placement accuracy, and early crop establishment. Pelleting performance depends on the interplay among binder–filler composition, pellet structure, and post-pelleting moisture conditions, which collectively influence durability, germination, and seedling vigor. Recent developments include biodegradable and bio-based materials, biochar and micronutrient additives, and biological agents that enhance stress tolerance and early growth. Advances in pelleting machinery and quality-control tools have improved uniformity and process automation, while nano-enabled and stimuli-responsive coatings introduce new opportunities for controlled release and climate-resilient applications. Integrating mechanistic insights on filler–binder interactions with digital technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI) offers a pathway toward more consistent and scalable formulations. Despite these gains, adoption remains limited in smallholder systems due to cost, access, and material constraints. Seed pelleting represents a converging frontier of material science, engineering, and sustainable agriculture, with significant potential to improve input efficiency and contribute to resilient food systems.
{"title":"Seed Pelleting Technologies: Paving the Way for Resilient and Sustainable Future Farming","authors":"Bilquees Bozdar, Nazir Ahmed, Mehtab Rai Meghwar, Zhengjie Zhu, Afifa Talpur, Zhen Hua Li","doi":"10.1002/fes3.70193","DOIUrl":"10.1002/fes3.70193","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Seed pelleting is an emerging precision-agriculture technology that transforms small or irregular seeds into uniform units to enhance mechanical sowing, placement accuracy, and early crop establishment. Pelleting performance depends on the interplay among binder–filler composition, pellet structure, and post-pelleting moisture conditions, which collectively influence durability, germination, and seedling vigor. Recent developments include biodegradable and bio-based materials, biochar and micronutrient additives, and biological agents that enhance stress tolerance and early growth. Advances in pelleting machinery and quality-control tools have improved uniformity and process automation, while nano-enabled and stimuli-responsive coatings introduce new opportunities for controlled release and climate-resilient applications. Integrating mechanistic insights on filler–binder interactions with digital technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI) offers a pathway toward more consistent and scalable formulations. Despite these gains, adoption remains limited in smallholder systems due to cost, access, and material constraints. Seed pelleting represents a converging frontier of material science, engineering, and sustainable agriculture, with significant potential to improve input efficiency and contribute to resilient food systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":54283,"journal":{"name":"Food and Energy Security","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fes3.70193","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146083383","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Hasneen Jahan, Arifa Jannat, Md Abdullah Al Noman, Sumaiyea Siddika, Tanjum Afrin Taj, Md. Rubel Ahmed
This study investigated the post-COVID-19 food security and livelihood status of the marginalized Garo indigenous community in Bangladesh. A cross-sectional household survey was conducted from August to November 2023, encompassing 300 households in the Tangail and Mymensingh districts of Bangladesh. The household food insecurity access scale (HFIAS) and a livelihood assessment index (LAI) were utilized in conjunction with a logistic regression model to ascertain the determinants of household food security. The findings revealed that food insecurity, which was prevalent in 93% of households during lockdown, improved to 59% after the pandemic. Financial capital and natural capital were most significantly impacted, whereas physical capital remained relatively stable. The regression analysis indicated that increased household income, natural capital, and physical capital are positively and significantly correlated with food security status. Common coping strategies, which include reducing meal size and frequency and consuming fewer preferred foods, were identified. The findings also suggest that despite ongoing recovery, persistent structural vulnerabilities necessitate policy interventions, including income support, targeted credit, improved agricultural inputs, and strengthened social safety nets, to enhance resilience and mitigate reliance on negative coping mechanisms within indigenous households.
{"title":"Analyzing Food Security and Livelihood Dynamics of the Indigenous Community in Bangladesh: A Post-COVID-19 Perspective","authors":"Hasneen Jahan, Arifa Jannat, Md Abdullah Al Noman, Sumaiyea Siddika, Tanjum Afrin Taj, Md. Rubel Ahmed","doi":"10.1002/fes3.70202","DOIUrl":"10.1002/fes3.70202","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study investigated the post-COVID-19 food security and livelihood status of the marginalized <i>Garo</i> indigenous community in Bangladesh. A cross-sectional household survey was conducted from August to November 2023, encompassing 300 households in the Tangail and Mymensingh districts of Bangladesh. The household food insecurity access scale (HFIAS) and a livelihood assessment index (LAI) were utilized in conjunction with a logistic regression model to ascertain the determinants of household food security. The findings revealed that food insecurity, which was prevalent in 93% of households during lockdown, improved to 59% after the pandemic. Financial capital and natural capital were most significantly impacted, whereas physical capital remained relatively stable. The regression analysis indicated that increased household income, natural capital, and physical capital are positively and significantly correlated with food security status. Common coping strategies, which include reducing meal size and frequency and consuming fewer preferred foods, were identified. The findings also suggest that despite ongoing recovery, persistent structural vulnerabilities necessitate policy interventions, including income support, targeted credit, improved agricultural inputs, and strengthened social safety nets, to enhance resilience and mitigate reliance on negative coping mechanisms within indigenous households.</p>","PeriodicalId":54283,"journal":{"name":"Food and Energy Security","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fes3.70202","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146057772","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Unreasonable nitrogen fertilizer use intensifies nitrogen losses, resulting in environmental contamination. Nitrification inhibitors and urease inhibitors are widely employed to reduce environmental pollution and enhance nitrogen use efficiency. However, under fertigation, the mechanism by which nitrogen cycle inhibitors improve dry matter accumulation and yield in summer maize by influencing physiological processes remains unclear. Consequently, a field experiment was conducted from 2020 to 2021 in the Huang-Huai-Hai region using a fertigation management system. The experiment included five treatments: no nitrogen application (N0), urea ammonium nitrate alone (U), urea ammonium nitrate with both urease and nitrification inhibitors (U-DN), urea ammonium nitrate with a urease inhibitor (U-N), and urea ammonium nitrate with a nitrification inhibitor (U-D). Nitrogen was applied at a rate of 210 kg ha−1, with nitrogen inhibitors added at 0.05% of the total nitrogen input. The study systematically evaluated the effects of different inhibitor applications on summer maize photosynthetic characteristics, antioxidant capacity, and grain yield. The results showed that, under fertigation, the combined application of nitrogen cycle inhibitors with urea ammonium nitrate optimized nitrogen supply during the crop's later growth stages. This enhanced leaf antioxidant enzyme activity, reduced malondialdehyde content by 19.7%, effectively delayed leaf senescence, enhanced photosynthetic potential and net assimilation rate during the grain filling stage, and promoted dry matter accumulation in the late growth stage, ultimately increasing summer maize yield by 13.2%. Overall, these findings indicated that nitrogen cycle inhibitors optimize the spatiotemporal effectiveness of nitrogen supply under fertigation, thereby enhancing late-stage photosynthetic performance and dry matter accumulation through delayed leaf senescence, and provide practical insights for achieving high and stable maize yields through optimized nitrogen management.
氮肥使用不合理加剧了氮肥的流失,造成环境污染。硝化抑制剂和脲酶抑制剂被广泛应用于减少环境污染和提高氮的利用效率。然而,在施肥条件下,氮循环抑制剂通过影响生理过程提高夏玉米干物质积累和产量的机制尚不清楚。为此,于2020 - 2021年在黄淮海地区进行了施肥管理系统的田间试验。试验分为不施氮(N0)、单独施氮(U)、脲酶和硝化抑制剂同时施氮(U- dn)、脲酶抑制剂施氮(U- n)和硝化抑制剂施氮(U- d) 5个处理。施氮量为210 kg ha - 1,氮抑制剂的添加量为总氮输入量的0.05%。本研究系统评价了不同抑制剂用量对夏玉米光合特性、抗氧化能力和籽粒产量的影响。结果表明,在施肥条件下,氮素循环抑制剂与硝酸铵配施优化了作物生育后期的氮素供应。提高叶片抗氧化酶活性,降低丙二醛含量19.7%,有效延缓叶片衰老,提高灌浆期光合势和净同化率,促进生育后期干物质积累,最终提高夏玉米产量13.2%。综上所述,氮循环抑制剂优化了施氮条件下氮素供应的时空有效性,从而通过延缓叶片衰老提高后期光合性能和干物质积累,为优化氮素管理实现玉米高产稳产提供了实践启示。
{"title":"Nitrogen Inhibitors Enhance Photosynthetic Potential by Delaying Maize Leaf Senescence Under Fertigation","authors":"Yifeng Li, Jing Zhang, Zhiyuan Huang, Ningning Yu, Peng Liu, Bin Zhao, Jiwang Zhang, Baizhao Ren","doi":"10.1002/fes3.70203","DOIUrl":"10.1002/fes3.70203","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Unreasonable nitrogen fertilizer use intensifies nitrogen losses, resulting in environmental contamination. Nitrification inhibitors and urease inhibitors are widely employed to reduce environmental pollution and enhance nitrogen use efficiency. However, under fertigation, the mechanism by which nitrogen cycle inhibitors improve dry matter accumulation and yield in summer maize by influencing physiological processes remains unclear. Consequently, a field experiment was conducted from 2020 to 2021 in the Huang-Huai-Hai region using a fertigation management system. The experiment included five treatments: no nitrogen application (N0), urea ammonium nitrate alone (U), urea ammonium nitrate with both urease and nitrification inhibitors (U-DN), urea ammonium nitrate with a urease inhibitor (U-N), and urea ammonium nitrate with a nitrification inhibitor (U-D). Nitrogen was applied at a rate of 210 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>, with nitrogen inhibitors added at 0.05% of the total nitrogen input. The study systematically evaluated the effects of different inhibitor applications on summer maize photosynthetic characteristics, antioxidant capacity, and grain yield. The results showed that, under fertigation, the combined application of nitrogen cycle inhibitors with urea ammonium nitrate optimized nitrogen supply during the crop's later growth stages. This enhanced leaf antioxidant enzyme activity, reduced malondialdehyde content by 19.7%, effectively delayed leaf senescence, enhanced photosynthetic potential and net assimilation rate during the grain filling stage, and promoted dry matter accumulation in the late growth stage, ultimately increasing summer maize yield by 13.2%. Overall, these findings indicated that nitrogen cycle inhibitors optimize the spatiotemporal effectiveness of nitrogen supply under fertigation, thereby enhancing late-stage photosynthetic performance and dry matter accumulation through delayed leaf senescence, and provide practical insights for achieving high and stable maize yields through optimized nitrogen management.</p>","PeriodicalId":54283,"journal":{"name":"Food and Energy Security","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fes3.70203","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146091212","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Mitigating climate change while guaranteeing food security is an important issue. Currently, the coordination of food security, carbon reduction and sequestration (CRS) and its influencing mechanism are unclear. In this study, we analyze the interactions and influencing factors between the two using a geographically and temporally weighted regression (GTWR) model. The results show that the national coupling coordination degree (CCD) increased from 0.477 in 2001 to 0.508 in 2022, indicating a shift from dissonance to coordination. Significant regional heterogeneity exists in coupling coordination. The GTWR results reveal that the share of grain-sown area, agricultural technology, labor quantity and quality, and mechanization exert significant positive effects on coordinated development, whereas chemical fertilizer use has a significant negative impact. Moreover, a U-shaped relationship is identified between regional economic development and CCD, suggesting that economic growth initially constrains but eventually promotes coordinated development after surpassing a certain threshold. These findings highlight the need for region-specific policy design, with a particular emphasis on improving education and human capital in western and southwestern China, as well as promoting the diffusion and application of agricultural technologies and mechanization.
{"title":"Coordinating Food Security With Carbon Reduction and Sequestration in China","authors":"Huanhuan He, Hui Wei","doi":"10.1002/fes3.70201","DOIUrl":"10.1002/fes3.70201","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Mitigating climate change while guaranteeing food security is an important issue. Currently, the coordination of food security, carbon reduction and sequestration (CRS) and its influencing mechanism are unclear. In this study, we analyze the interactions and influencing factors between the two using a geographically and temporally weighted regression (GTWR) model. The results show that the national coupling coordination degree (CCD) increased from 0.477 in 2001 to 0.508 in 2022, indicating a shift from dissonance to coordination. Significant regional heterogeneity exists in coupling coordination. The GTWR results reveal that the share of grain-sown area, agricultural technology, labor quantity and quality, and mechanization exert significant positive effects on coordinated development, whereas chemical fertilizer use has a significant negative impact. Moreover, a U-shaped relationship is identified between regional economic development and CCD, suggesting that economic growth initially constrains but eventually promotes coordinated development after surpassing a certain threshold. These findings highlight the need for region-specific policy design, with a particular emphasis on improving education and human capital in western and southwestern China, as well as promoting the diffusion and application of agricultural technologies and mechanization.</p>","PeriodicalId":54283,"journal":{"name":"Food and Energy Security","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fes3.70201","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146057862","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Guoling Guo, Haoguo Liu, Le Xu, Xinxin Wang, Mengxue Xia, Zhiwen Gao, Lun Liu, Wei Heng, Zhenfeng Ye, Li Liu, Bing Jia, Xiaomei Tang
Iron (Fe) is an essential micronutrient for plant photosynthesis and human health. Pear represents a widely consumed fruit for human Fe intake, yet its yield and quality are frequently challenged by Fe deficiency (FD) stress. Despite the prevalence of FD stress in agricultural production under generally alkaline and calcareous conditions, pear plants implement a series of adaptive responses to maintain Fe homeostasis, which remains poorly understood. In this study, key time points for RNA-seq analysis were determined by examining FD-related physiological indicators in pear seedlings (Pyrus betulaefolia) under short-term FD stress. The results revealed that FD stress enhanced root rhizosphere acidification (peaking at 24 h post-treatment) and caused a gradual decrease in leaf SPAD value and Fe content, while no obvious aboveground chlorosis phenotype was observed. By comparing RNA-seq data of root samples at 3, 6, 12, and 24 h post-FD stress with the control (0 h), a total of 8369 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were generated, and 1423 DEGs were identified throughout the stress period. Functional annotation indicated that DEGs were enriched in transcriptional regulation, signal transduction, and secondary metabolism, while KEGG enrichment implied that DEGs are involved in sugar, proline, γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA), galactose, raffinose, and polyamines metabolism, as well as hormone signaling. In addition, 18 PbHAs, 18 PbFROs, and 19 PbIRTs were identified, where Chr13.g22071 (PbHA), Chr7.g31823 (PbFRO), and Chr11.g10287 and Chr11.g10606 (PbIRTs) may be responsible for Fe homeostasis in FD-stressed pear plants. Moreover, 490 transcription factors (TFs) were screened from the DEGs, with ERF, MYB, WRKY, bHLH, and NAC TFs accounting for the majority. Notably, 21 from 36 bHLHs were FD-induced, among which Chr3.g19682, Chr5.g08031, Chr2.g44023, and Chr8.g558833 might be the core FD regulators. Furthermore, based on the results of the gene coexpression analysis, an intricate regulatory network showing synergistic or antagonistic interactions between these TFs and core Fe uptake-related genes has been established. Overall, this study identifies prospective genes for maintaining Fe homeostasis under FD stress, offering a theoretical foundation for further research into the molecular mechanisms of pear adaptation to FD stress, and potentially guiding the development of FD-tolerant pear varieties.
{"title":"Transcriptional Analysis and Genome-Wide Identification of HA, FRO, and IRT Gene Families Reveal Key Regulators in Pear Seedlings to Short-Term Iron Deficiency Stress","authors":"Guoling Guo, Haoguo Liu, Le Xu, Xinxin Wang, Mengxue Xia, Zhiwen Gao, Lun Liu, Wei Heng, Zhenfeng Ye, Li Liu, Bing Jia, Xiaomei Tang","doi":"10.1002/fes3.70198","DOIUrl":"10.1002/fes3.70198","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Iron (Fe) is an essential micronutrient for plant photosynthesis and human health. Pear represents a widely consumed fruit for human Fe intake, yet its yield and quality are frequently challenged by Fe deficiency (FD) stress. Despite the prevalence of FD stress in agricultural production under generally alkaline and calcareous conditions, pear plants implement a series of adaptive responses to maintain Fe homeostasis, which remains poorly understood. In this study, key time points for RNA-seq analysis were determined by examining FD-related physiological indicators in pear seedlings (<i>Pyrus betulaefolia</i>) under short-term FD stress. The results revealed that FD stress enhanced root rhizosphere acidification (peaking at 24 h post-treatment) and caused a gradual decrease in leaf SPAD value and Fe content, while no obvious aboveground chlorosis phenotype was observed. By comparing RNA-seq data of root samples at 3, 6, 12, and 24 h post-FD stress with the control (0 h), a total of 8369 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were generated, and 1423 DEGs were identified throughout the stress period. Functional annotation indicated that DEGs were enriched in transcriptional regulation, signal transduction, and secondary metabolism, while KEGG enrichment implied that DEGs are involved in sugar, proline, γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA), galactose, raffinose, and polyamines metabolism, as well as hormone signaling. In addition, 18 <i>PbHAs</i>, 18 <i>PbFROs</i>, and 19 <i>PbIRTs</i> were identified, where <i>Chr13.g22071</i> (<i>PbHA</i>), <i>Chr7.g31823</i> (<i>PbFRO</i>), and <i>Chr11.g10287</i> and <i>Chr11.g10606</i> (<i>PbIRTs</i>) may be responsible for Fe homeostasis in FD-stressed pear plants. Moreover, 490 transcription factors (TFs) were screened from the DEGs, with ERF, MYB, WRKY, bHLH, and NAC TFs accounting for the majority. Notably, 21 from 36 bHLHs were FD-induced, among which <i>Chr3.g19682</i>, <i>Chr5.g08031</i>, <i>Chr2.g44023</i>, and <i>Chr8.g558833</i> might be the core FD regulators. Furthermore, based on the results of the gene coexpression analysis, an intricate regulatory network showing synergistic or antagonistic interactions between these TFs and core Fe uptake-related genes has been established. Overall, this study identifies prospective genes for maintaining Fe homeostasis under FD stress, offering a theoretical foundation for further research into the molecular mechanisms of pear adaptation to FD stress, and potentially guiding the development of FD-tolerant pear varieties.</p>","PeriodicalId":54283,"journal":{"name":"Food and Energy Security","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fes3.70198","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146002592","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Bangladesh is highly exposed to recurrent covariate and idiosyncratic shocks that pose persistent threats to household food security. This study examines whether agricultural production diversity and market participation can mitigate the adverse effects of such shocks on food security. Using nationally representative data from the Household Income and Expenditure Survey (HIES) 2022 and applying Partial Least Squares Path Modeling (PLS-PM), the analysis captures both direct and mediated pathways linking shocks, livelihood responses, and food insecurity. Descriptive results show that floods and waterlogging are the most prevalent covariate shocks, while illness, job loss, and income reductions constitute the dominant idiosyncratic shocks. Food insecurity remains widespread, with only 43% of households food secure and 24% experiencing severe food insecurity. Structural path estimates indicate that covariate shocks significantly worsen household food security, while simultaneously inducing greater agricultural production diversification and increased market participation. Agricultural production diversity strongly promotes market participation and independently reduces food insecurity, while market participation also exerts a direct food-security-enhancing effect. Mediation analysis reveals that diversification and market participation partially absorb the negative impacts of covariate and combined shocks on food security; however, these strategies are insufficient to fully offset the overall adverse effects of shocks. Idiosyncratic shocks show limited and statistically insignificant mediated effects. Overall, the findings highlight that while agricultural diversification and market participation enhance household resilience, covariate shocks remain the primary drivers of food insecurity in Bangladesh. Strengthening diversified production systems alongside efficient and inclusive market access is therefore critical for reducing food insecurity in shock-prone contexts.
{"title":"Agricultural Production Diversity and Market Participation Can Absorb the Impact of Shocks on Household Food Security","authors":"Md. Salman, Shihab Uddin Ahmad, Jincheng Zhang, Md Abdur Rouf Sarkar","doi":"10.1002/fes3.70199","DOIUrl":"10.1002/fes3.70199","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Bangladesh is highly exposed to recurrent covariate and idiosyncratic shocks that pose persistent threats to household food security. This study examines whether agricultural production diversity and market participation can mitigate the adverse effects of such shocks on food security. Using nationally representative data from the Household Income and Expenditure Survey (HIES) 2022 and applying Partial Least Squares Path Modeling (PLS-PM), the analysis captures both direct and mediated pathways linking shocks, livelihood responses, and food insecurity. Descriptive results show that floods and waterlogging are the most prevalent covariate shocks, while illness, job loss, and income reductions constitute the dominant idiosyncratic shocks. Food insecurity remains widespread, with only 43% of households food secure and 24% experiencing severe food insecurity. Structural path estimates indicate that covariate shocks significantly worsen household food security, while simultaneously inducing greater agricultural production diversification and increased market participation. Agricultural production diversity strongly promotes market participation and independently reduces food insecurity, while market participation also exerts a direct food-security-enhancing effect. Mediation analysis reveals that diversification and market participation partially absorb the negative impacts of covariate and combined shocks on food security; however, these strategies are insufficient to fully offset the overall adverse effects of shocks. Idiosyncratic shocks show limited and statistically insignificant mediated effects. Overall, the findings highlight that while agricultural diversification and market participation enhance household resilience, covariate shocks remain the primary drivers of food insecurity in Bangladesh. Strengthening diversified production systems alongside efficient and inclusive market access is therefore critical for reducing food insecurity in shock-prone contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":54283,"journal":{"name":"Food and Energy Security","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fes3.70199","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146002593","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Kieron Moller, A. Pouyan Nejadhashemi, Mohammad Tirgari, Muhammad Talha, Nilson Aparecido Vieira Junior, Ana Julia Paula Carcedo, Ignacio A. Ciampitti, P. V. Vara Prasad, Amadiane Diallo
This study advances a novel, multidimensional approach to quantifying agricultural resilience to climate shocks by integrating economic, calories, and risk-based indicators. To accomplish this, resilience is defined in terms of the failure–recovery dynamics of net cash farm income (NCFI) and daily calorie intake. In addition, farmers' resilience is further evaluated by incorporating their risk preferences through certainty equivalents (CE). An integrated modeling framework, combining a crop model with a whole-farm system model, is utilized to simulate crop yield outcomes under three climate regimes: dry, normal, and wet. Then, the whole-farm system model is used to evaluate the impacts on households of eight agricultural practice interventions, which are defined by three plant densities and three planting dates. The analysis is conducted across four economic classes of farmers: very poor, poor, middle, and rich in Senegal's Groundnut Basin. Resilience is evaluated using a recovery-based framework that models disruption duration and treats the recovery period as a decision variable to be optimized. Risk is incorporated through a tool that compares alternative practices across different levels of risk aversion. Results demonstrate that while wealthier farmers often have higher incomes, they can exhibit lower resilience in calorie intake under shocks due to their higher baseline needs. Calorie deficiencies persist across all economic classes and climate scenarios. Notably, alternative practices improve resilience across districts, particularly in Thiès, where farmers demonstrate higher levels of recovery and higher CE values. This study presents a comprehensive resilience evaluation framework that provides robust guidance for policy decisions on climate-resilient farming interventions, adaptable to diverse agroecological and socioeconomic contexts.
{"title":"Exploring the Impact of Climate Variability on the Resilience of Senegalese Farmers Through Nutrition, Economic, and Risk Factors","authors":"Kieron Moller, A. Pouyan Nejadhashemi, Mohammad Tirgari, Muhammad Talha, Nilson Aparecido Vieira Junior, Ana Julia Paula Carcedo, Ignacio A. Ciampitti, P. V. Vara Prasad, Amadiane Diallo","doi":"10.1002/fes3.70197","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/fes3.70197","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study advances a novel, multidimensional approach to quantifying agricultural resilience to climate shocks by integrating economic, calories, and risk-based indicators. To accomplish this, resilience is defined in terms of the failure–recovery dynamics of net cash farm income (NCFI) and daily calorie intake. In addition, farmers' resilience is further evaluated by incorporating their risk preferences through certainty equivalents (CE). An integrated modeling framework, combining a crop model with a whole-farm system model, is utilized to simulate crop yield outcomes under three climate regimes: dry, normal, and wet. Then, the whole-farm system model is used to evaluate the impacts on households of eight agricultural practice interventions, which are defined by three plant densities and three planting dates. The analysis is conducted across four economic classes of farmers: very poor, poor, middle, and rich in Senegal's Groundnut Basin. Resilience is evaluated using a recovery-based framework that models disruption duration and treats the recovery period as a decision variable to be optimized. Risk is incorporated through a tool that compares alternative practices across different levels of risk aversion. Results demonstrate that while wealthier farmers often have higher incomes, they can exhibit lower resilience in calorie intake under shocks due to their higher baseline needs. Calorie deficiencies persist across all economic classes and climate scenarios. Notably, alternative practices improve resilience across districts, particularly in Thiès, where farmers demonstrate higher levels of recovery and higher CE values. This study presents a comprehensive resilience evaluation framework that provides robust guidance for policy decisions on climate-resilient farming interventions, adaptable to diverse agroecological and socioeconomic contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":54283,"journal":{"name":"Food and Energy Security","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fes3.70197","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146091244","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Kieron Moller, A. Pouyan Nejadhashemi, Mohammad Tirgari, Muhammad Talha, Nilson Aparecido Vieira Junior, Ana Julia Paula Carcedo, Ignacio A. Ciampitti, P. V. Vara Prasad, Amadiane Diallo
This study advances a novel, multidimensional approach to quantifying agricultural resilience to climate shocks by integrating economic, calories, and risk-based indicators. To accomplish this, resilience is defined in terms of the failure–recovery dynamics of net cash farm income (NCFI) and daily calorie intake. In addition, farmers' resilience is further evaluated by incorporating their risk preferences through certainty equivalents (CE). An integrated modeling framework, combining a crop model with a whole-farm system model, is utilized to simulate crop yield outcomes under three climate regimes: dry, normal, and wet. Then, the whole-farm system model is used to evaluate the impacts on households of eight agricultural practice interventions, which are defined by three plant densities and three planting dates. The analysis is conducted across four economic classes of farmers: very poor, poor, middle, and rich in Senegal's Groundnut Basin. Resilience is evaluated using a recovery-based framework that models disruption duration and treats the recovery period as a decision variable to be optimized. Risk is incorporated through a tool that compares alternative practices across different levels of risk aversion. Results demonstrate that while wealthier farmers often have higher incomes, they can exhibit lower resilience in calorie intake under shocks due to their higher baseline needs. Calorie deficiencies persist across all economic classes and climate scenarios. Notably, alternative practices improve resilience across districts, particularly in Thiès, where farmers demonstrate higher levels of recovery and higher CE values. This study presents a comprehensive resilience evaluation framework that provides robust guidance for policy decisions on climate-resilient farming interventions, adaptable to diverse agroecological and socioeconomic contexts.
{"title":"Exploring the Impact of Climate Variability on the Resilience of Senegalese Farmers Through Nutrition, Economic, and Risk Factors","authors":"Kieron Moller, A. Pouyan Nejadhashemi, Mohammad Tirgari, Muhammad Talha, Nilson Aparecido Vieira Junior, Ana Julia Paula Carcedo, Ignacio A. Ciampitti, P. V. Vara Prasad, Amadiane Diallo","doi":"10.1002/fes3.70197","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/fes3.70197","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study advances a novel, multidimensional approach to quantifying agricultural resilience to climate shocks by integrating economic, calories, and risk-based indicators. To accomplish this, resilience is defined in terms of the failure–recovery dynamics of net cash farm income (NCFI) and daily calorie intake. In addition, farmers' resilience is further evaluated by incorporating their risk preferences through certainty equivalents (CE). An integrated modeling framework, combining a crop model with a whole-farm system model, is utilized to simulate crop yield outcomes under three climate regimes: dry, normal, and wet. Then, the whole-farm system model is used to evaluate the impacts on households of eight agricultural practice interventions, which are defined by three plant densities and three planting dates. The analysis is conducted across four economic classes of farmers: very poor, poor, middle, and rich in Senegal's Groundnut Basin. Resilience is evaluated using a recovery-based framework that models disruption duration and treats the recovery period as a decision variable to be optimized. Risk is incorporated through a tool that compares alternative practices across different levels of risk aversion. Results demonstrate that while wealthier farmers often have higher incomes, they can exhibit lower resilience in calorie intake under shocks due to their higher baseline needs. Calorie deficiencies persist across all economic classes and climate scenarios. Notably, alternative practices improve resilience across districts, particularly in Thiès, where farmers demonstrate higher levels of recovery and higher CE values. This study presents a comprehensive resilience evaluation framework that provides robust guidance for policy decisions on climate-resilient farming interventions, adaptable to diverse agroecological and socioeconomic contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":54283,"journal":{"name":"Food and Energy Security","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fes3.70197","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146091231","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Bienlo Annick Marina Pare, Bindayaoba Thomas Yameogo
This study investigates the combined effect of insecurity-related shocks and livestock sales on the food security of rural households in Burkina Faso. Using data from 3855 households collected through the 2023 National Integrated Food Security and Nutrition Survey, the analysis employs an ordered probit model alongside instrumental variable approach. The findings indicate that insecurity shocks significantly increase the likelihood of selling small or young livestock. While this strategy improves food security for the most vulnerable households, it fails to preserve the fragile balance of marginal food security. The results also show that literacy and access to public transportation are positively associated with the likelihood of choosing this strategy. Additionally, current food consumption status among rural households is influenced by gender, literacy, and mobile phone ownership. Results suggest that resilience and food security in regions affected by terrorist violence depend on policy interventions that promote restocking, enhance transport access, and deliver tailored, gender-responsive support. Crucially, these interventions must prevent the over-selling of young animals to safeguard herd renewal and long-term resilience.
{"title":"Do Livestock Sales Following Insecurity-Related Shocks Improve Food Security? Evidence From Rural Burkina Faso","authors":"Bienlo Annick Marina Pare, Bindayaoba Thomas Yameogo","doi":"10.1002/fes3.70196","DOIUrl":"10.1002/fes3.70196","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study investigates the combined effect of insecurity-related shocks and livestock sales on the food security of rural households in Burkina Faso. Using data from 3855 households collected through the 2023 National Integrated Food Security and Nutrition Survey, the analysis employs an ordered probit model alongside instrumental variable approach. The findings indicate that insecurity shocks significantly increase the likelihood of selling small or young livestock. While this strategy improves food security for the most vulnerable households, it fails to preserve the fragile balance of marginal food security. The results also show that literacy and access to public transportation are positively associated with the likelihood of choosing this strategy. Additionally, current food consumption status among rural households is influenced by gender, literacy, and mobile phone ownership. Results suggest that resilience and food security in regions affected by terrorist violence depend on policy interventions that promote restocking, enhance transport access, and deliver tailored, gender-responsive support. Crucially, these interventions must prevent the over-selling of young animals to safeguard herd renewal and long-term resilience.</p>","PeriodicalId":54283,"journal":{"name":"Food and Energy Security","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fes3.70196","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146007607","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
M. M. Mundu, J. I. Sempewo, G. B. Mahoro, Vidya Sankarapandian, Daniel Ejim Uti
Agri-photovoltaic (Agri-PV) systems integrate agricultural production with solar energy generation on the same land, offering a promising response to the dual global challenges of food security and renewable energy expansion under increasing land constraints. This review critically synthesizes current scientific evidence on the environmental, agricultural, and socio-economic impacts of Agri-PV systems, with particular emphasis on their implications for local ecosystems and sustainable land use. Using a systematic review approach, we examine how different Agri-PV configurations influence soil health, water use efficiency, microclimate regulation, biodiversity, and crop productivity across diverse climatic and geographic contexts. The evidence indicates that well-designed Agri-PV systems can enhance soil moisture retention, moderate extreme temperatures, and improve water-use efficiency, thereby strengthening agricultural resilience, particularly in arid and semi-arid environments. However, outcomes are highly context-dependent, with potential trade-offs arising from excessive shading, altered hydrology, soil compaction during installation, and ecological disturbances if systems are poorly planned or managed. Case studies from Asia, Europe, and Africa demonstrate that participatory design, adaptive system configurations, and supportive governance frameworks are critical for balancing food production and energy generation objectives. The review further evaluates the contribution of Agri-PV systems to multiple United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, notably SDG 2 (Zero Hunger), SDG 7 (Affordable and Clean Energy), SDG 13 (Climate Action), and SDG 15 (Life on Land), highlighting both synergies and potential conflicts. Key mitigation and policy strategies are identified to safeguard long-term environmental integrity and promote equitable adoption. Overall, Agri-PV systems emerge as a viable component of integrated food–energy–land strategies, provided that deployment is guided by context-sensitive design, inclusive governance, and evidence-based policy frameworks.
{"title":"Environmental Impacts of Agri-Photovoltaics Systems on Local Ecosystems","authors":"M. M. Mundu, J. I. Sempewo, G. B. Mahoro, Vidya Sankarapandian, Daniel Ejim Uti","doi":"10.1002/fes3.70186","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/fes3.70186","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Agri-photovoltaic (Agri-PV) systems integrate agricultural production with solar energy generation on the same land, offering a promising response to the dual global challenges of food security and renewable energy expansion under increasing land constraints. This review critically synthesizes current scientific evidence on the environmental, agricultural, and socio-economic impacts of Agri-PV systems, with particular emphasis on their implications for local ecosystems and sustainable land use. Using a systematic review approach, we examine how different Agri-PV configurations influence soil health, water use efficiency, microclimate regulation, biodiversity, and crop productivity across diverse climatic and geographic contexts. The evidence indicates that well-designed Agri-PV systems can enhance soil moisture retention, moderate extreme temperatures, and improve water-use efficiency, thereby strengthening agricultural resilience, particularly in arid and semi-arid environments. However, outcomes are highly context-dependent, with potential trade-offs arising from excessive shading, altered hydrology, soil compaction during installation, and ecological disturbances if systems are poorly planned or managed. Case studies from Asia, Europe, and Africa demonstrate that participatory design, adaptive system configurations, and supportive governance frameworks are critical for balancing food production and energy generation objectives. The review further evaluates the contribution of Agri-PV systems to multiple United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, notably SDG 2 (Zero Hunger), SDG 7 (Affordable and Clean Energy), SDG 13 (Climate Action), and SDG 15 (Life on Land), highlighting both synergies and potential conflicts. Key mitigation and policy strategies are identified to safeguard long-term environmental integrity and promote equitable adoption. Overall, Agri-PV systems emerge as a viable component of integrated food–energy–land strategies, provided that deployment is guided by context-sensitive design, inclusive governance, and evidence-based policy frameworks.</p>","PeriodicalId":54283,"journal":{"name":"Food and Energy Security","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fes3.70186","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146007468","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}