Advancing Economical and Environmentally Conscious Electrification: A Comprehensive Framework for Microgrid Design in Off-Grid Regions

IF 4.4 4区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES Global Challenges Pub Date : 2024-10-13 DOI:10.1002/gch2.202400169
A M Almas Shahriyar Azad, Zarin Tasnim Oishi, Md. Ariful Islam, Md. Rakibul Islam
{"title":"Advancing Economical and Environmentally Conscious Electrification: A Comprehensive Framework for Microgrid Design in Off-Grid Regions","authors":"A M Almas Shahriyar Azad,&nbsp;Zarin Tasnim Oishi,&nbsp;Md. Ariful Islam,&nbsp;Md. Rakibul Islam","doi":"10.1002/gch2.202400169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The design of renewable energy systems traditionally emphasizes life cycle costs, often focusing primarily on emissions rather than a comprehensive life cycle impact assessment. This research proposes a four-tier methodology to balance cost-effectiveness and sustainability in the electrification of remote areas. Tier 1 focuses on understanding the community context by analyzing electrical load profiles, meteorological data, and component specifications for microgrid design. Tier 2 evaluates the feasibility of various systems, optimizing them through cost analysis and Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) to rank alternatives. Tier 3 assesses environmental impacts using life cycle assessment, ranking alternatives based on environmental criteria. Tier 4 integrates cost and environmental rankings to determine the most suitable energy configurations, followed by sensitivity analysis to ensure robust decision-making. The methodology is validated through a case study of an unelectrified remote community, demonstrating that the PV-Wind Turbine-Biomass Generator-Converter configuration is the most robust alternative, proving to be the optimal choice in 50% of the analyzed scenarios, achieving a Cost of Energy of 0.213 USD/kWh while minimizing environmental impact across all 18 criteria considered over a 25-year life cycle. This novel framework offers a scalable approach to designing renewable energy systems, enhancing sustainable electrification efforts in developing regions.</p>","PeriodicalId":12646,"journal":{"name":"Global Challenges","volume":"8 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/gch2.202400169","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Challenges","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/gch2.202400169","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The design of renewable energy systems traditionally emphasizes life cycle costs, often focusing primarily on emissions rather than a comprehensive life cycle impact assessment. This research proposes a four-tier methodology to balance cost-effectiveness and sustainability in the electrification of remote areas. Tier 1 focuses on understanding the community context by analyzing electrical load profiles, meteorological data, and component specifications for microgrid design. Tier 2 evaluates the feasibility of various systems, optimizing them through cost analysis and Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) to rank alternatives. Tier 3 assesses environmental impacts using life cycle assessment, ranking alternatives based on environmental criteria. Tier 4 integrates cost and environmental rankings to determine the most suitable energy configurations, followed by sensitivity analysis to ensure robust decision-making. The methodology is validated through a case study of an unelectrified remote community, demonstrating that the PV-Wind Turbine-Biomass Generator-Converter configuration is the most robust alternative, proving to be the optimal choice in 50% of the analyzed scenarios, achieving a Cost of Energy of 0.213 USD/kWh while minimizing environmental impact across all 18 criteria considered over a 25-year life cycle. This novel framework offers a scalable approach to designing renewable energy systems, enhancing sustainable electrification efforts in developing regions.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
推进经济环保型电气化:离网地区微电网设计综合框架
可再生能源系统的设计传统上强调生命周期成本,通常主要关注排放量,而不是全面的生命周期影响评估。本研究提出了一种四层方法,以平衡偏远地区电气化的成本效益和可持续性。第一层侧重于通过分析电力负荷概况、气象数据和微电网设计的组件规格来了解社区环境。第 2 层评估各种系统的可行性,通过成本分析和多标准决策(MCDM)对替代方案进行排序,从而优化系统。第 3 层利用生命周期评估对环境影响进行评估,并根据环境标准对替代方案进行排序。第 4 层综合成本和环境排名,确定最合适的能源配置,然后进行敏感性分析,以确保决策的稳健性。该方法通过对一个无电偏远社区的案例研究进行了验证,证明光伏-风力涡轮机-生物质发电机-逆变器配置是最稳健的替代方案,在 50%的分析方案中被证明是最佳选择,能源成本为 0.213 美元/千瓦时,同时在 25 年的生命周期内,在考虑的所有 18 项标准中,对环境的影响最小。这种新颖的框架为设计可再生能源系统提供了一种可扩展的方法,从而加强了发展中地区的可持续电气化努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global Challenges
Global Challenges MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
79
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Advancing Economical and Environmentally Conscious Electrification: A Comprehensive Framework for Microgrid Design in Off-Grid Regions Issue Information New Insight into Mercury Removal from Fish Meat Using a Single-Component Solution Containing cysteine Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production Using TiO2-based Catalysts: A Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1