Co-production in action: Navigating the research-to-implementation space in wildlife conservation through a Community of Practice

IF 2.8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Conservation Science and Practice Pub Date : 2024-10-21 DOI:10.1111/csp2.13251
Sami Livingston, Ashley A. Dayer, Allyssa Zebrowski, Abby Sterling, Nolan Schillerstrom, Thomas Archibald, Willandia Chaves
{"title":"Co-production in action: Navigating the research-to-implementation space in wildlife conservation through a Community of Practice","authors":"Sami Livingston,&nbsp;Ashley A. Dayer,&nbsp;Allyssa Zebrowski,&nbsp;Abby Sterling,&nbsp;Nolan Schillerstrom,&nbsp;Thomas Archibald,&nbsp;Willandia Chaves","doi":"10.1111/csp2.13251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Effective conservation practices require addressing the divide between research and implementation. Co-production, which emphasizes collaboration and diverse knowledge exchange, is increasingly recognized as valuable in conservation to address this challenge, yet empirical insights remain limited. This case study explores using a Community of Practice (CoP) as an avenue for facilitating co-production in shorebird conservation. Centering researchers and practitioners within implementation initiatives, we evaluate factors enabling a successful CoP and barriers hindering members' experiences. Capacity emerged as the predominant barrier, while the leading factors contributing to CoP success were having a dedicated space to support labor division, relationship building, and informal learning among CoP members. Leveraging our evaluation insights, we offer practical recommendations for structuring a CoP to optimize these benefits and advance the integration of CoPs and co-production principles in conservation practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":51337,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Science and Practice","volume":"6 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/csp2.13251","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conservation Science and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/csp2.13251","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Effective conservation practices require addressing the divide between research and implementation. Co-production, which emphasizes collaboration and diverse knowledge exchange, is increasingly recognized as valuable in conservation to address this challenge, yet empirical insights remain limited. This case study explores using a Community of Practice (CoP) as an avenue for facilitating co-production in shorebird conservation. Centering researchers and practitioners within implementation initiatives, we evaluate factors enabling a successful CoP and barriers hindering members' experiences. Capacity emerged as the predominant barrier, while the leading factors contributing to CoP success were having a dedicated space to support labor division, relationship building, and informal learning among CoP members. Leveraging our evaluation insights, we offer practical recommendations for structuring a CoP to optimize these benefits and advance the integration of CoPs and co-production principles in conservation practice.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
共同生产在行动:通过 "实践社区 "探索野生动物保护从研究到实施的空间
有效的保护实践需要解决研究与实施之间的鸿沟。共同生产强调合作和多样化的知识交流,越来越多的人认识到共同生产在保护中的价值,以应对这一挑战,但经验见解仍然有限。本案例研究探讨了将实践社区(CoP)作为促进岸鸟保护中共同生产的途径。我们以实施计划中的研究人员和实践者为中心,评估了促进 CoP 取得成功的因素以及阻碍成员体验的障碍。能力是最主要的障碍,而有助于 CoP 取得成功的主要因素是拥有一个支持分工的专用空间、建立关系以及 CoP 成员之间的非正式学习。利用我们的评估见解,我们为构建 CoP 提供了实用建议,以优化这些益处,并推动在保护实践中整合 CoP 和共同生产原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Conservation Science and Practice
Conservation Science and Practice BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
6.50%
发文量
240
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Correction to “Exposure, sensitivity, or adaptive capacity? Reviewing assessments that use only two of three elements of climate change vulnerability” C2C—conflict to coexistence: A global approach to manage human–wildlife conflict for coexistence Short-term impacts of selective logging on forest elephants Translating eDNA data into conservation action: Partnerships to support imperiled amphibians in coastal California wetlands
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1