Time-varying copula-based compound flood risk assessment of extreme rainfall and high water level under a non-stationary environment

IF 3 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Journal of Flood Risk Management Pub Date : 2024-08-26 DOI:10.1111/jfr3.13032
Mingming Song, Jianyun Zhang, Yanli Liu, Cuishan Liu, Zhenxin Bao, Junliang Jin, Ruimin He, Guodong Bian, Guoqing Wang
{"title":"Time-varying copula-based compound flood risk assessment of extreme rainfall and high water level under a non-stationary environment","authors":"Mingming Song,&nbsp;Jianyun Zhang,&nbsp;Yanli Liu,&nbsp;Cuishan Liu,&nbsp;Zhenxin Bao,&nbsp;Junliang Jin,&nbsp;Ruimin He,&nbsp;Guodong Bian,&nbsp;Guoqing Wang","doi":"10.1111/jfr3.13032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Quantifying flood risk depends on accurate probability estimation, which is challenging due to non-stationarity and the combined effects of multiple factors in a changing environment. The threat of compound flood risks may spread from coastal areas to inland basins, which have received less attention. In this study, a framework based on time-varying copulas was introduced for the treatment of compound flood risk and bivariate design in non-stationary environments. Archimedean copulas were developed to diagnose the non-stationary trends of flood risk. Return periods, average annual reliabilities, and bivariate designs were estimated. Model uncertainty was analyzed by comparing the results for stationary and non-stationary conditions. The case study investigated the extreme rainfall and water level series from the Qinhuai River Basin and the Yangtze River in China. The results showed that marginal distributions and correlations are non-stationary in all bivariate combinations. Ignoring composite effects may lead to inappropriate quantification of flood risk. Excluding non-stationarity may lead to risk over or underestimation. It showed the limitations of the 1-day scale and quantified the uncertainty of non-stationary models. This study provided a flood risk assessment framework in a changing environment and a risk-based design technique, which is essential for climate change adaptation and water management.</p>","PeriodicalId":49294,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Flood Risk Management","volume":"17 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jfr3.13032","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Flood Risk Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jfr3.13032","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Quantifying flood risk depends on accurate probability estimation, which is challenging due to non-stationarity and the combined effects of multiple factors in a changing environment. The threat of compound flood risks may spread from coastal areas to inland basins, which have received less attention. In this study, a framework based on time-varying copulas was introduced for the treatment of compound flood risk and bivariate design in non-stationary environments. Archimedean copulas were developed to diagnose the non-stationary trends of flood risk. Return periods, average annual reliabilities, and bivariate designs were estimated. Model uncertainty was analyzed by comparing the results for stationary and non-stationary conditions. The case study investigated the extreme rainfall and water level series from the Qinhuai River Basin and the Yangtze River in China. The results showed that marginal distributions and correlations are non-stationary in all bivariate combinations. Ignoring composite effects may lead to inappropriate quantification of flood risk. Excluding non-stationarity may lead to risk over or underestimation. It showed the limitations of the 1-day scale and quantified the uncertainty of non-stationary models. This study provided a flood risk assessment framework in a changing environment and a risk-based design technique, which is essential for climate change adaptation and water management.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非稳态环境下基于时变共轭的极端降雨和高水位复合洪水风险评估
洪水风险的量化取决于准确的概率估算,而由于非稳态性和不断变化的环境中多种因素的综合影响,概率估算具有挑战性。复合洪水风险的威胁可能会从沿海地区蔓延到内陆盆地,而内陆盆地受到的关注较少。在本研究中,引入了一个基于时变协方差的框架,用于处理非平稳环境中的复合洪水风险和双变量设计。开发了阿基米德共轭系数来诊断洪水风险的非平稳趋势。对回归期、年均可靠度和双变量设计进行了估算。通过比较静态和非静态条件下的结果,分析了模型的不确定性。案例研究调查了中国秦淮河流域和长江的极端降雨量和水位序列。结果表明,在所有二元组合中,边际分布和相关性都是非平稳的。忽略复合效应可能导致洪水风险的不恰当量化。排除非平稳性可能会导致风险高估或低估。该研究显示了 1 天尺度的局限性,并量化了非稳态模型的不确定性。这项研究提供了一个变化环境中的洪水风险评估框架和一种基于风险的设计技术,这对于适应气候变化和水资源管理至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Flood Risk Management
Journal of Flood Risk Management ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-WATER RESOURCES
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
7.30%
发文量
93
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Flood Risk Management provides an international platform for knowledge sharing in all areas related to flood risk. Its explicit aim is to disseminate ideas across the range of disciplines where flood related research is carried out and it provides content ranging from leading edge academic papers to applied content with the practitioner in mind. Readers and authors come from a wide background and include hydrologists, meteorologists, geographers, geomorphologists, conservationists, civil engineers, social scientists, policy makers, insurers and practitioners. They share an interest in managing the complex interactions between the many skills and disciplines that underpin the management of flood risk across the world.
期刊最新文献
Toward Sustainable Flood Resilience: Assessing Efficacy of Paddy Field Dams to Reduce Floods in Jakarta Uncrewed Aerial Vehicle-Based Multispectral Imagery for River Soil Monitoring Putting the English Flooding of 2019–2021 in the Context of Antecedent Conditions Bridge Collapse in Mutsu, Aomori Prefecture, Japan in 2021 Attribution of Flood Forecasting Errors From a Multi-Model Perspective in Milan Urbanized River Basins
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1