Attribution of Flood Forecasting Errors From a Multi-Model Perspective in Milan Urbanized River Basins

IF 3 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Journal of Flood Risk Management Pub Date : 2025-02-28 DOI:10.1111/jfr3.70023
A. Ceppi, E. Gambini, G. Ravazzani, G. Lombardi, L. Cerri, S. Meucci, M. Mancini
{"title":"Attribution of Flood Forecasting Errors From a Multi-Model Perspective in Milan Urbanized River Basins","authors":"A. Ceppi,&nbsp;E. Gambini,&nbsp;G. Ravazzani,&nbsp;G. Lombardi,&nbsp;L. Cerri,&nbsp;S. Meucci,&nbsp;M. Mancini","doi":"10.1111/jfr3.70023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In synergy with hydraulic works, hydro-meteorological forecasts and related preventive protection measures are effective tools for mitigating flood risk. Nevertheless, the performance and reliability of coupled prediction systems in real-time operations are often influenced by errors in meteorological and hydrological models and their interactions. The paper discusses the source and magnitude of such combined errors, analyzing the functionality of a warning system to predict river floods in northern Italian catchments. The proposed flood alert tool consists of a hydrological model, driven by atmospheric forcings from various weather models and ground observations. This study aims to analyze the sources of flood forecasting errors in small urbanized river basins by disentangling the uncertainties in precipitation and discharge predictions. The results emphasize the relationship between quantitative precipitation and peak discharge forecast errors during convective and stratiform events, with a prevalent tendency toward underestimation of peak flows. The paper highlights the added value and limitations of the real-time multi-model approach as an effective compromise amidst the wide spread of model forecasts. This assessment is based on 4 years of operational simulations (2019–2022) on the river Seveso, where a municipal monitoring system for flood alerts (MOCAP) has also been implemented to support local civil protection procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":49294,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Flood Risk Management","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jfr3.70023","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Flood Risk Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jfr3.70023","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In synergy with hydraulic works, hydro-meteorological forecasts and related preventive protection measures are effective tools for mitigating flood risk. Nevertheless, the performance and reliability of coupled prediction systems in real-time operations are often influenced by errors in meteorological and hydrological models and their interactions. The paper discusses the source and magnitude of such combined errors, analyzing the functionality of a warning system to predict river floods in northern Italian catchments. The proposed flood alert tool consists of a hydrological model, driven by atmospheric forcings from various weather models and ground observations. This study aims to analyze the sources of flood forecasting errors in small urbanized river basins by disentangling the uncertainties in precipitation and discharge predictions. The results emphasize the relationship between quantitative precipitation and peak discharge forecast errors during convective and stratiform events, with a prevalent tendency toward underestimation of peak flows. The paper highlights the added value and limitations of the real-time multi-model approach as an effective compromise amidst the wide spread of model forecasts. This assessment is based on 4 years of operational simulations (2019–2022) on the river Seveso, where a municipal monitoring system for flood alerts (MOCAP) has also been implemented to support local civil protection procedures.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
米兰城市化河流流域多模式洪水预报误差归因研究
水文气象预报及相关的预防保护措施配合水利工程,是减低水浸风险的有效工具。然而,耦合预测系统在实时运行中的性能和可靠性经常受到气象和水文模型及其相互作用误差的影响。本文讨论了这种综合误差的来源和程度,分析了意大利北部集水区洪水预警系统的功能。提出的洪水警报工具包括一个水文模型,由各种天气模型和地面观测的大气强迫驱动。本研究旨在通过对降水和流量预测的不确定性进行解耦,分析城市化小流域洪水预报误差的来源。结果强调了在对流和层状天气中定量降水与峰值流量预测误差之间的关系,并且普遍倾向于低估峰值流量。本文强调了实时多模型方法作为一种有效的折衷方法在广泛的模型预测中所具有的附加价值和局限性。这项评估是基于对塞韦索河4年的运行模拟(2019-2022年),该河还实施了市政洪水预警监测系统(MOCAP),以支持当地的民防程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Flood Risk Management
Journal of Flood Risk Management ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-WATER RESOURCES
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
7.30%
发文量
93
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Flood Risk Management provides an international platform for knowledge sharing in all areas related to flood risk. Its explicit aim is to disseminate ideas across the range of disciplines where flood related research is carried out and it provides content ranging from leading edge academic papers to applied content with the practitioner in mind. Readers and authors come from a wide background and include hydrologists, meteorologists, geographers, geomorphologists, conservationists, civil engineers, social scientists, policy makers, insurers and practitioners. They share an interest in managing the complex interactions between the many skills and disciplines that underpin the management of flood risk across the world.
期刊最新文献
Comprehensive Framework for the Assessment of Multi-Level Pluvial Flood Risk Nonstationary Flood Frequency Analysis Using Reconstructing Past Millennium Floods Based on Large-Scale Climate Indices The Flood Event in July 2021 in Europe—Observations, Conclusions, Challenges Approaching Urban Flood Modelling According to Available Data: A State-of-the-Art Review and Future Challenges Future Climate Change Assessment in Flood Risk Management: A Synthesis of Practices in Germany and the BeNeLux Countries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1