Mastering the Narrative: Precision Reporting of Risk and Outcomes in Liver Transplantation

IF 26.8 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Journal of Hepatology Pub Date : 2024-11-16 DOI:10.1016/j.jhep.2024.11.013
Femke H.C. de Goeij, Chase J. Wehrle, Fariba Abassi, Sangeeta Satish, Mingyi Zhang, Rebecca Panconesi, Koji Hashimoto, Charles M. Miller, Wojciech G. Polak, Pierre-Alain Clavien, Jeroen de Jonge, Andrea Schlegel
{"title":"Mastering the Narrative: Precision Reporting of Risk and Outcomes in Liver Transplantation","authors":"Femke H.C. de Goeij, Chase J. Wehrle, Fariba Abassi, Sangeeta Satish, Mingyi Zhang, Rebecca Panconesi, Koji Hashimoto, Charles M. Miller, Wojciech G. Polak, Pierre-Alain Clavien, Jeroen de Jonge, Andrea Schlegel","doi":"10.1016/j.jhep.2024.11.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Liver transplantation is associated with a high risk of postoperative complications due to the complexity of the surgical procedure, recipient disease severity and wide range of graft quality which remains somewhat unpredictable. However, survival rates after transplantation continue to improve and the focus has thus turned to other clinically relevant endpoints including posttransplant complications, patient quality of life and costs. Procedures like liver transplantation offer the entire spectrum of postsurgical events, even in donor-recipient constellations deemed of low risk within recently defined benchmark criteria. The Clavien-Dindo classification and the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI®) were established to assess postoperative morbidity and are widely utilized across surgical specialties. However, these scores unfortunately are associted with observer variability when used in practice, mainly due to the lack of uniform definitions. Interventions required to treat a specific complication are the main drivers of clinically relevant complications, which may result in under- or over-scoring of posttransplant events.The number and grade of complications is frequently used as a metric assessing specific donor-recipient-risk-profiles and in assessing new approaches such as machine perfusion. Thus, accurate stratification is critical to comparing various potential risk factors. The concept of Benchmarking was recently introduced in surgery and transplantation as a mechanism of standardizing expected donor/recipient risk with outcomes within the first year after surgery. The management of complications, however, differs significantly worldwide, as does the rating scale assigned to various complications. This may lead to inhomogeneous interpretation of study results, leading to difficulty in assessing the clinical effects of novel preservation technologies and other therapeutics in liver transplantation. It also limits generalizability of study findings between countries, centers, and even providers.This article critically discusses frequent challenges associated with risk and outcome assessment following major surgery with a particular focus in liver transplantation.","PeriodicalId":15888,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hepatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":26.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2024.11.013","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Liver transplantation is associated with a high risk of postoperative complications due to the complexity of the surgical procedure, recipient disease severity and wide range of graft quality which remains somewhat unpredictable. However, survival rates after transplantation continue to improve and the focus has thus turned to other clinically relevant endpoints including posttransplant complications, patient quality of life and costs. Procedures like liver transplantation offer the entire spectrum of postsurgical events, even in donor-recipient constellations deemed of low risk within recently defined benchmark criteria. The Clavien-Dindo classification and the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI®) were established to assess postoperative morbidity and are widely utilized across surgical specialties. However, these scores unfortunately are associted with observer variability when used in practice, mainly due to the lack of uniform definitions. Interventions required to treat a specific complication are the main drivers of clinically relevant complications, which may result in under- or over-scoring of posttransplant events.The number and grade of complications is frequently used as a metric assessing specific donor-recipient-risk-profiles and in assessing new approaches such as machine perfusion. Thus, accurate stratification is critical to comparing various potential risk factors. The concept of Benchmarking was recently introduced in surgery and transplantation as a mechanism of standardizing expected donor/recipient risk with outcomes within the first year after surgery. The management of complications, however, differs significantly worldwide, as does the rating scale assigned to various complications. This may lead to inhomogeneous interpretation of study results, leading to difficulty in assessing the clinical effects of novel preservation technologies and other therapeutics in liver transplantation. It also limits generalizability of study findings between countries, centers, and even providers.This article critically discusses frequent challenges associated with risk and outcome assessment following major surgery with a particular focus in liver transplantation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
掌握叙述:精确报告肝移植的风险和结果
由于手术过程的复杂性、受体疾病的严重性以及移植物质量的广泛性,肝移植术后并发症的风险很高。然而,移植手术后的存活率在不断提高,因此人们开始关注其他与临床相关的终点,包括移植后并发症、患者生活质量和成本。像肝移植这样的手术会导致各种术后并发症,即使是在最近定义的基准标准中被视为低风险的供体和受体组合中也是如此。克拉维恩-丁多分类法和综合并发症指数(CCI®)是为评估术后发病率而制定的,并在各外科专科广泛使用。但遗憾的是,这些评分在实际应用中存在观察者差异,主要原因是缺乏统一的定义。治疗特定并发症所需的干预措施是临床相关并发症的主要驱动因素,这可能导致移植后事件的评分过低或过高。并发症的数量和等级经常被用作评估特定供体-受体-风险档案的指标,以及评估机器灌注等新方法的指标。因此,准确的分层对于比较各种潜在风险因素至关重要。最近,外科和移植领域引入了 "基准"(Benchmarking)的概念,作为一种将预期的供体/受体风险与术后第一年的结果标准化的机制。然而,世界各地对并发症的处理方法大相径庭,对各种并发症的评级标准也不尽相同。这可能导致对研究结果的解释不一致,从而难以评估新型保存技术和其他疗法在肝移植中的临床效果。这也限制了研究结果在不同国家、不同中心甚至不同医疗机构之间的通用性。本文以肝移植为重点,批判性地讨论了大手术后风险和结果评估方面经常遇到的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Hepatology
Journal of Hepatology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
46.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
2325
审稿时长
30 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hepatology is the official publication of the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL). It is dedicated to presenting clinical and basic research in the field of hepatology through original papers, reviews, case reports, and letters to the Editor. The Journal is published in English and may consider supplements that pass an editorial review.
期刊最新文献
Mastering the Narrative: Precision Reporting of Risk and Outcomes in Liver Transplantation Contents Editorial Board GEMA-Na: a crucial step in solving the MELD-Creatinine dilemma PNPLA3(148M) is a gain-of-function mutation that promotes hepatic steatosis by inhibiting ATGL-mediated triglyceride hydrolysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1