Allele frequency impacts the cross-ancestry portability of gene expression prediction in lymphoblastoid cell lines.

IF 8.1 1区 生物学 Q1 GENETICS & HEREDITY American journal of human genetics Pub Date : 2024-11-12 DOI:10.1016/j.ajhg.2024.10.009
Marie Saitou, Andy Dahl, Qingbo Wang, Xuanyao Liu
{"title":"Allele frequency impacts the cross-ancestry portability of gene expression prediction in lymphoblastoid cell lines.","authors":"Marie Saitou, Andy Dahl, Qingbo Wang, Xuanyao Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.ajhg.2024.10.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Population-level genetic studies are overwhelmingly biased toward European ancestries. Transferring genetic predictions from European ancestries to other ancestries results in a substantial loss of accuracy. Yet, it remains unclear how much various genetic factors, such as causal effect differences, linkage disequilibrium (LD) differences, or allele frequency differences, contribute to the loss of prediction accuracy across ancestries. In this study, we used gene expression levels in lymphoblastoid cell lines to understand how much each genetic factor contributes to lowered portability of gene expression prediction from European to African ancestries. We found that cis-genetic effects on gene expression are highly similar between European and African individuals. However, we found that allele frequency differences of causal variants have a striking impact on prediction portability. For example, portability is reduced by more than 32% when the causal cis-variant is common (minor allele frequency, MAF >5%) in European samples (training population) but is rarer (MAF <5%) in African samples (prediction population). While large allele frequency differences can decrease portability through increasing LD differences, we also determined that causal allele frequency can significantly impact portability when the impact from LD is substantially controlled. This observation suggests that improving statistical fine-mapping alone does not overcome the loss of portability resulting from differences in causal allele frequency. We conclude that causal cis-eQTL effects are highly similar in European and African individuals, and allele frequency differences have a large impact on the accuracy of gene expression prediction.</p>","PeriodicalId":7659,"journal":{"name":"American journal of human genetics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of human genetics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2024.10.009","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Population-level genetic studies are overwhelmingly biased toward European ancestries. Transferring genetic predictions from European ancestries to other ancestries results in a substantial loss of accuracy. Yet, it remains unclear how much various genetic factors, such as causal effect differences, linkage disequilibrium (LD) differences, or allele frequency differences, contribute to the loss of prediction accuracy across ancestries. In this study, we used gene expression levels in lymphoblastoid cell lines to understand how much each genetic factor contributes to lowered portability of gene expression prediction from European to African ancestries. We found that cis-genetic effects on gene expression are highly similar between European and African individuals. However, we found that allele frequency differences of causal variants have a striking impact on prediction portability. For example, portability is reduced by more than 32% when the causal cis-variant is common (minor allele frequency, MAF >5%) in European samples (training population) but is rarer (MAF <5%) in African samples (prediction population). While large allele frequency differences can decrease portability through increasing LD differences, we also determined that causal allele frequency can significantly impact portability when the impact from LD is substantially controlled. This observation suggests that improving statistical fine-mapping alone does not overcome the loss of portability resulting from differences in causal allele frequency. We conclude that causal cis-eQTL effects are highly similar in European and African individuals, and allele frequency differences have a large impact on the accuracy of gene expression prediction.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
等位基因频率影响淋巴母细胞系基因表达预测的跨种可移植性。
人口层面的基因研究绝大多数偏重于欧洲血统。将欧洲血统的遗传预测转移到其他血统会导致准确性大幅下降。然而,各种遗传因素(如因果效应差异、连锁不平衡(LD)差异或等位基因频率差异)在多大程度上导致了跨血统预测准确性的损失,目前仍不清楚。在这项研究中,我们利用淋巴母细胞样细胞系的基因表达水平来了解每种遗传因素对降低从欧洲血统到非洲血统的基因表达预测可移植性的贡献程度。我们发现,顺式遗传对基因表达的影响在欧洲人和非洲人之间非常相似。然而,我们发现因果变异的等位基因频率差异对预测的可移植性有显著影响。例如,当因果顺式变异体在欧洲样本(训练人群)中常见(小等位基因频率,MAF >5%),而在非洲样本(训练人群)中较少见(MAF >5%)时,可移植性会降低 32% 以上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.70
自引率
4.10%
发文量
185
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Human Genetics (AJHG) is a monthly journal published by Cell Press, chosen by The American Society of Human Genetics (ASHG) as its premier publication starting from January 2008. AJHG represents Cell Press's first society-owned journal, and both ASHG and Cell Press anticipate significant synergies between AJHG content and that of other Cell Press titles.
期刊最新文献
The PRIMED Consortium: Reducing disparities in polygenic risk assessment. Comparative analysis of predicted DNA secondary structures infers complex human centromere topology. Toward trustable use of machine learning models of variant effects in the clinic. Allele frequency impacts the cross-ancestry portability of gene expression prediction in lymphoblastoid cell lines. Inherited infertility: Mapping loci associated with impaired female reproduction.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1