Value of bronchial amylase level for predicting ventilator associated pneumonia in intubated adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM BMC Pulmonary Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-16 DOI:10.1186/s12890-024-03393-z
Tingzhen Xu, Qinkang Shen, Yuting He, Xiaozhuang Pan, Haijun Huang, Hua Xu
{"title":"Value of bronchial amylase level for predicting ventilator associated pneumonia in intubated adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Tingzhen Xu, Qinkang Shen, Yuting He, Xiaozhuang Pan, Haijun Huang, Hua Xu","doi":"10.1186/s12890-024-03393-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The ability of bronchial amylase level for predicting ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP) has been extensively studied with conflicting results. This meta-analysis aimed to explore the value of bronchial amylase for predicting VAP in intubated adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched up to November 2023. The diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), sensitivity, and specificity were calculated. The summary receiver operating characteristic curve was estimated, and the area under the curve (AUROC) was calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, six studies including 769 patients were included in this review, of whom 273 (36%) were developed VAP. The cutoff values of bronchial amylase level were ranged from 8.1 U/L to 4681.5U/L. Heterogeneity between studies was assessed with an overall Q = 1.99, I<sup>2</sup> = 0, and P = 0.185, The pooled sensitivity and specificity for the overall population were 0.78 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.67-0.86] and 0.75(95% CI 0.56-0.88) respectively. The DOR was 11(95% CI 3.0-40.0). The pooled AUROC was 0.83 (95%CI 0.80-0.86).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The bronchial amylase is a helpful marker for predicting VAP in intubated adults. However, it cannot be recommended as the single definitive test for VAP, but rather it must be interpreted in context with information from careful medical history, physical examination, and when feasible, microbiological assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":9148,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pulmonary Medicine","volume":"24 1","pages":"571"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11569614/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pulmonary Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-024-03393-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The ability of bronchial amylase level for predicting ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP) has been extensively studied with conflicting results. This meta-analysis aimed to explore the value of bronchial amylase for predicting VAP in intubated adults.

Methods: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched up to November 2023. The diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), sensitivity, and specificity were calculated. The summary receiver operating characteristic curve was estimated, and the area under the curve (AUROC) was calculated.

Results: Overall, six studies including 769 patients were included in this review, of whom 273 (36%) were developed VAP. The cutoff values of bronchial amylase level were ranged from 8.1 U/L to 4681.5U/L. Heterogeneity between studies was assessed with an overall Q = 1.99, I2 = 0, and P = 0.185, The pooled sensitivity and specificity for the overall population were 0.78 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.67-0.86] and 0.75(95% CI 0.56-0.88) respectively. The DOR was 11(95% CI 3.0-40.0). The pooled AUROC was 0.83 (95%CI 0.80-0.86).

Conclusions: The bronchial amylase is a helpful marker for predicting VAP in intubated adults. However, it cannot be recommended as the single definitive test for VAP, but rather it must be interpreted in context with information from careful medical history, physical examination, and when feasible, microbiological assessment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
支气管淀粉酶水平对插管成人呼吸机相关肺炎的预测价值:系统综述和荟萃分析。
背景:支气管淀粉酶水平预测呼吸机相关肺炎(VAP)的能力已被广泛研究,但结果却相互矛盾。本荟萃分析旨在探讨支气管淀粉酶对插管成人 VAP 的预测价值:方法:检索了截至 2023 年 11 月的 PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials。计算了诊断几率比(DOR)、敏感性和特异性。估算了接收者操作特征曲线,并计算了曲线下面积(AUROC):本综述共纳入六项研究,包括 769 名患者,其中 273 人(36%)出现 VAP。支气管淀粉酶水平的临界值范围为 8.1 U/L 至 4681.5U/L。研究之间的异质性评估结果为:总 Q = 1.99,I2 = 0,P = 0.185。DOR为11(95% CI 3.0-40.0)。汇总的AUROC为0.83(95%CI 0.80-0.86):结论:支气管淀粉酶是预测插管成人 VAP 的有效指标。结论:支气管淀粉酶是预测插管成人 VAP 的有用标记物,但不能将其作为 VAP 的唯一确定检测指标,而必须结合仔细询问病史、体格检查以及在可行的情况下进行微生物学评估等信息进行解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Pulmonary Medicine
BMC Pulmonary Medicine RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
423
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pulmonary Medicine is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of pulmonary and associated disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
Proposal of a radiation-free screening protocol for early detection of interstitial lung involvement in seropositive and ACPA-positive rheumatoid arthritis. Electrical impedance tomography guided positive end-expiratory pressure titration in critically ill and surgical adult patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Predictive value of direct bilirubin and total bile acid in lung adenocarcinoma patients treated with EGFR-TKIs. Ectopic thyroid carcinoma in central airway with normally located goiterous thyroid gland: A case report. Candidate gene polymorphisms associated with silicosis and coal workers' pneumoconiosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1