Phytotoxic response of ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum L.) to extreme exposure to two anionic surfactants

IF 6.2 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety Pub Date : 2024-11-16 DOI:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2024.117320
Emmeline D’Incau, Antoine Spaudo, Sonia Henry, Stéphanie Ouvrard
{"title":"Phytotoxic response of ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum L.) to extreme exposure to two anionic surfactants","authors":"Emmeline D’Incau,&nbsp;Antoine Spaudo,&nbsp;Sonia Henry,&nbsp;Stéphanie Ouvrard","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoenv.2024.117320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Bioremediation is an effective and environment-friendly treatment used to clean up hydrocarbon-contaminated soil. However, the effectiveness of this treatment is often limited by the low bioavailability of the target contaminants. Surfactants addition thus appears as a way to increase solubility of these hydrophobic molecules and consequently improve their bioavailability. The use of biological surfactants is often favoured over synthetic ones because they are claimed to be non-toxic to the environment though few studies have addressed this issue. The present work evaluated the effects of a synthetic surfactant, sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS) and a biosurfactant (rhamnolipids) on germination and growth of ryegrass over a wide range of concentrations, between one up to ten times their respective critical micellar concentration (CMC). Experimental results showed that SDS inhibited seed germination of <em>Lolium multiflorum</em> at high concentrations (10 × CMC), unlike rhamnolipids, which did not induce any toxicity symptom at germination stage. At the growth stage, high rhamnolipid concentrations induced chronic phytotoxicity by significantly reducing root length, decreasing biomass production and disrupting the enzymatic defence system. Thus, biosurfactants are less toxic than synthetic ones but their application at high doses in bioremediation treatments might still induce phytotoxicity symptoms and thus negatively affect the environment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":303,"journal":{"name":"Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety","volume":"288 ","pages":"Article 117320"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147651324013964","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bioremediation is an effective and environment-friendly treatment used to clean up hydrocarbon-contaminated soil. However, the effectiveness of this treatment is often limited by the low bioavailability of the target contaminants. Surfactants addition thus appears as a way to increase solubility of these hydrophobic molecules and consequently improve their bioavailability. The use of biological surfactants is often favoured over synthetic ones because they are claimed to be non-toxic to the environment though few studies have addressed this issue. The present work evaluated the effects of a synthetic surfactant, sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS) and a biosurfactant (rhamnolipids) on germination and growth of ryegrass over a wide range of concentrations, between one up to ten times their respective critical micellar concentration (CMC). Experimental results showed that SDS inhibited seed germination of Lolium multiflorum at high concentrations (10 × CMC), unlike rhamnolipids, which did not induce any toxicity symptom at germination stage. At the growth stage, high rhamnolipid concentrations induced chronic phytotoxicity by significantly reducing root length, decreasing biomass production and disrupting the enzymatic defence system. Thus, biosurfactants are less toxic than synthetic ones but their application at high doses in bioremediation treatments might still induce phytotoxicity symptoms and thus negatively affect the environment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
黑麦草(Lolium multiflorum L.)极端暴露于两种阴离子表面活性剂的植物毒性反应。
生物修复是一种有效且环保的处理方法,用于清理受碳氢化合物污染的土壤。然而,由于目标污染物的生物利用率较低,这种处理方法的有效性往往受到限制。因此,添加表面活性剂似乎是增加这些疏水分子的溶解度,从而提高其生物利用率的一种方法。生物表面活性剂通常比合成表面活性剂更受青睐,因为据称生物表面活性剂对环境无毒,但很少有研究涉及这一问题。本研究评估了合成表面活性剂十二烷基硫酸钠(SDS)和生物表面活性剂鼠李糖脂(rhamnolipids)对黑麦草发芽和生长的影响,浓度范围很广,从 1 倍到 10 倍临界胶束浓度(CMC)不等。实验结果表明,高浓度(10 × CMC)的 SDS 会抑制多花甘蓝种子的萌发,而鼠李糖脂则不同,在萌发阶段不会引起任何毒性症状。在生长阶段,高浓度鼠李糖脂会诱发慢性植物毒性,显著降低根长、减少生物量的产生并破坏酶防御系统。因此,生物表面活性剂的毒性低于合成表面活性剂,但在生物修复处理中使用高剂量的生物表面活性剂仍可能诱发植物毒性症状,从而对环境造成负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
1234
审稿时长
88 days
期刊介绍: Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety is a multi-disciplinary journal that focuses on understanding the exposure and effects of environmental contamination on organisms including human health. The scope of the journal covers three main themes. The topics within these themes, indicated below, include (but are not limited to) the following: Ecotoxicology、Environmental Chemistry、Environmental Safety etc.
期刊最新文献
The Aloe vera acemannan polysaccharides inhibit phthalate-induced cell viability, metastasis, and stemness in colorectal cancer cells. The correlation between fluoride-induced bone damage and reduced DLAV formation in Zebrafish Larvae. Time spent in outdoor light is associated with increased blood pressure, increased hypertension risk, and decreased hypotension risk. cGAS deficiency mitigated PM2.5-induced lung injury by inhibiting ferroptosis. Combined effects and potential mechanisms of phthalate metabolites on serum sex hormones among reproductive-aged women: An integrated epidemiology and computational toxicology study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1