Social norms in Korsakoff's syndrome and alcohol-related dementia.

IF 1.8 4区 心理学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology Pub Date : 2024-11-17 DOI:10.1080/13803395.2024.2426826
Robin Boere, Erik Oudman, Albert Postma, Esther van den Berg
{"title":"Social norms in Korsakoff's syndrome and alcohol-related dementia.","authors":"Robin Boere, Erik Oudman, Albert Postma, Esther van den Berg","doi":"10.1080/13803395.2024.2426826","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Social cognition is essential for individuals to perceive, process, and interpret social information that enables them to function effectively in society. Korsakoff's syndrome (KS) and alcohol-related dementia (ARD) are alcohol-related cognitive disorders that are likely to impair social cognition. This study aimed to investigate the ability to judge social norms in KS and ARD in comparison to healthy subjects.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The study included 30 patients with KS, 10 patients with ARD, and 74 age-, sex-, and education-matched control participants. The Social Norms Questionnaire - Dutch version (SNQ-NL) was used to measure social cognition, and standardized tests were used to examine the association between social cognition and executive functioning.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both KS and ARD patients performed worse in judging social norms when compared to healthy controls, but there was no significant difference between KS and ARD. Both KS and ARD patients performed worse on the SNQ-NL, judging appropriate behavior as inappropriate (Overadhere errors), than controls. When compared to control participants, patients with KS demonstrated significantly more Break Errors, while the differences between the ARD group and the control group did not reach statistical significance. There were no significant correlations between the SNQ-NL variables and performances on standardized tests for executive functioning in both the KS and control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the ability to judge social norms in KS and ARD in comparison to healthy subjects. The results show that compared to a control group, both KS and ARD patients performed worse in judging social norms. KS and ARD patients scored equally low on social norms identification. Overall, these findings can further help us understand the difficulties in social behavior as experienced by patients and care staff, since problems in accurately judging social norms could possibly contribute to the severe behavioral issues as observed in alcohol-related disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":15382,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2024.2426826","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Social cognition is essential for individuals to perceive, process, and interpret social information that enables them to function effectively in society. Korsakoff's syndrome (KS) and alcohol-related dementia (ARD) are alcohol-related cognitive disorders that are likely to impair social cognition. This study aimed to investigate the ability to judge social norms in KS and ARD in comparison to healthy subjects.

Method: The study included 30 patients with KS, 10 patients with ARD, and 74 age-, sex-, and education-matched control participants. The Social Norms Questionnaire - Dutch version (SNQ-NL) was used to measure social cognition, and standardized tests were used to examine the association between social cognition and executive functioning.

Results: Both KS and ARD patients performed worse in judging social norms when compared to healthy controls, but there was no significant difference between KS and ARD. Both KS and ARD patients performed worse on the SNQ-NL, judging appropriate behavior as inappropriate (Overadhere errors), than controls. When compared to control participants, patients with KS demonstrated significantly more Break Errors, while the differences between the ARD group and the control group did not reach statistical significance. There were no significant correlations between the SNQ-NL variables and performances on standardized tests for executive functioning in both the KS and control group.

Conclusions: This study aimed to investigate the ability to judge social norms in KS and ARD in comparison to healthy subjects. The results show that compared to a control group, both KS and ARD patients performed worse in judging social norms. KS and ARD patients scored equally low on social norms identification. Overall, these findings can further help us understand the difficulties in social behavior as experienced by patients and care staff, since problems in accurately judging social norms could possibly contribute to the severe behavioral issues as observed in alcohol-related disorders.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
科萨科夫综合症和酒精相关痴呆症的社会规范。
目的:社会认知对个人感知、处理和解释社会信息至关重要,它能使个人在社会中有效发挥作用。科萨科夫综合征(KS)和酒精相关性痴呆(ARD)是与酒精相关的认知障碍,很可能会损害社会认知能力。本研究旨在调查 KS 和 ARD 与健康受试者相比对社会规范的判断能力:研究对象包括 30 名 KS 患者、10 名 ARD 患者和 74 名年龄、性别和教育程度匹配的对照组参与者。社会规范问卷--荷兰语版(SNQ-NL)用于测量社会认知,标准化测试用于研究社会认知与执行功能之间的关联:结果:与健康对照组相比,KS和ARD患者在判断社会规范方面的表现都较差,但KS和ARD之间没有显著差异。与对照组相比,KS和ARD患者在SNQ-NL中将适当行为判定为不适当行为(过度错误)的表现均较差。与对照组相比,KS 患者的 "突破错误 "明显增多,而 ARD 组与对照组之间的差异未达到统计学意义上的显著性。在KS组和对照组中,SNQ-NL变量与执行功能标准化测试成绩之间没有明显的相关性:本研究旨在调查 KS 和 ARD 与健康受试者相比对社会规范的判断能力。结果显示,与对照组相比,KS 和 ARD 患者在判断社会规范方面的表现都较差。KS 和 ARD 患者在社会规范识别方面的得分同样较低。总之,这些研究结果可以进一步帮助我们了解患者和护理人员在社交行为方面遇到的困难,因为准确判断社会规范的问题可能是酒精相关障碍患者出现严重行为问题的原因之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
4.50%
发文量
52
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology ( JCEN) publishes research on the neuropsychological consequences of brain disease, disorders, and dysfunction, and aims to promote the integration of theories, methods, and research findings in clinical and experimental neuropsychology. The primary emphasis of JCEN is to publish original empirical research pertaining to brain-behavior relationships and neuropsychological manifestations of brain disease. Theoretical and methodological papers, critical reviews of content areas, and theoretically-relevant case studies are also welcome.
期刊最新文献
Subjective time dilation in abstinent patients with alcohol use disorder. Social norms in Korsakoff's syndrome and alcohol-related dementia. Psychological correlates of the good old days bias in mild traumatic brain injury. A tale of two constructs: confirmatory factor analysis of performance and symptom validity tests. Cardiorespiratory fitness and working memory in persons with traumatic brain injury: a cross-sectional analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1