Pub Date : 2026-01-06DOI: 10.1080/13803395.2025.2608340
Hannah M Klinger, Gillian T Coughlan, Kathleen M Hayden, JoAnn E Manson, Robert A Wild, Su Yon Jung, Ramon Casanova, Longjian Liu, Aladdin H Shadyab, Jean Wactawski-Wende, Susan M Schembre, Simin Liu, Stephen R Rapp, Rebecca E Amariglio, Dorene M Rentz, Susan M Resnick, Suzanne Baker, Rachel F Buckley
Introduction: Understanding the risk factors that associate with early cognitive decline in Alzheimer's disease (AD) is important to identify high-risk individuals and initiate early intervention. Existing studies show that APOEε4, systemic inflammation, and diabetes may play roles in cognitive decline, but the extent to which these factors interact with each other remains unclear. Our objective was to examine the main effects and higher-order interactions between APOEε4, high sensitivity-C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) as a measure of systemic inflammation, and diabetes on domain-specific measures of cognitive function in two ancillary studies of post-menopausal women from the Women's Health Initiative (WHI).
Method: We identified 2979 cognitively unimpaired women from the WHI Epidemiology of Cognitive Health Outcomes and the WHI Memory Study of Younger Women with cognitive follow-up of up to 13 years. Linear mixed-effects models examined the main and interactive effects of APOEε4, hs-CRP, and diabetes on longitudinal changes in the personal communication for Cognitive Status-modified Test (TICS-m), East Boston Memory Test (immediate and delayed; EBMT), Oral Trail Making Test (OTMT), Verbal Fluency Test (VF-A), Digit Span Test Backwards (DST-backward), and the California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT). All models were adjusted for baseline age, education, body mass index, the WHI randomization arm, and the cohort.
Results: APOEε4 carriers had steeper cognitive decline in TICS-m, EBMT (immediate and delayed), VF-A, and CVLT scores relative to non-carriers. Higher levels of hs-CRP were associated with steeper cognitive decline in the DST-backwards scores. There was no association of diabetes or any evidence of interactive effects on cognitive decline in our study.
Conclusions: In this large longitudinal study of post-menopausal women, our findings support the hypothesis that genetic risk and systemic inflammation independently influence cognitive decline, but there was no evidence of synergistic effects in postmenopausal women. Further research is needed to elucidate the mechanistic pathways underlying these associations with cognitive decline.
{"title":"Independent, but not synergistic, associations of <i>APOE</i>ε4 and systemic inflammation on cognitive decline: findings from the Women's Health Initiative.","authors":"Hannah M Klinger, Gillian T Coughlan, Kathleen M Hayden, JoAnn E Manson, Robert A Wild, Su Yon Jung, Ramon Casanova, Longjian Liu, Aladdin H Shadyab, Jean Wactawski-Wende, Susan M Schembre, Simin Liu, Stephen R Rapp, Rebecca E Amariglio, Dorene M Rentz, Susan M Resnick, Suzanne Baker, Rachel F Buckley","doi":"10.1080/13803395.2025.2608340","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2025.2608340","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Understanding the risk factors that associate with early cognitive decline in Alzheimer's disease (AD) is important to identify high-risk individuals and initiate early intervention. Existing studies show that APOEε4, systemic inflammation, and diabetes may play roles in cognitive decline, but the extent to which these factors interact with each other remains unclear. Our objective was to examine the main effects and higher-order interactions between APOEε4, high sensitivity-C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) as a measure of systemic inflammation, and diabetes on domain-specific measures of cognitive function in two ancillary studies of post-menopausal women from the Women's Health Initiative (WHI).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We identified 2979 cognitively unimpaired women from the WHI Epidemiology of Cognitive Health Outcomes and the WHI Memory Study of Younger Women with cognitive follow-up of up to 13 years. Linear mixed-effects models examined the main and interactive effects of APOEε4, hs-CRP, and diabetes on longitudinal changes in the personal communication for Cognitive Status-modified Test (TICS-m), East Boston Memory Test (immediate and delayed; EBMT), Oral Trail Making Test (OTMT), Verbal Fluency Test (VF-A), Digit Span Test Backwards (DST-backward), and the California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT). All models were adjusted for baseline age, education, body mass index, the WHI randomization arm, and the cohort.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>APOEε4 carriers had steeper cognitive decline in TICS-m, EBMT (immediate and delayed), VF-A, and CVLT scores relative to non-carriers. Higher levels of hs-CRP were associated with steeper cognitive decline in the DST-backwards scores. There was no association of diabetes or any evidence of interactive effects on cognitive decline in our study.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this large longitudinal study of post-menopausal women, our findings support the hypothesis that genetic risk and systemic inflammation independently influence cognitive decline, but there was no evidence of synergistic effects in postmenopausal women. Further research is needed to elucidate the mechanistic pathways underlying these associations with cognitive decline.</p>","PeriodicalId":15382,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145911831","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-02DOI: 10.1080/13803395.2025.2596181
Monika McAtarsney-Kovacs, Raju Sapkota, Shahina Pardhan, Ian van der Linde
Introduction: Early detection of cognitive decline is critical, yet commonly used screening tools may yield divergent results. This study examined the alignment of four widely used instruments in a community-dwelling cohort.
Method: Seventy-nine participants (Mage = 71.20, SD = 6.29; 39 male, 40 female) were recruited from the general community and assessed under standardized laboratory conditions. Participants completed the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-III (ACE-III), from which scores for the MoCA Memory Index Score (MoCA-MIS) and the Mini-Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination (M-ACE) were also calculated. Test agreement was examined using observed agreement and Cohen's kappa, and score relationships were evaluated using Pearson correlations.
Results: All but one test pair (M-ACE vs MoCA-MIS) showed strong score correlations. However, agreement between MoCA and ACE-III for classifying participants as below threshold was only fair. MoCA identified twice as many participants as impaired compared with ACE-III, raising the possibility of either greater sensitivity or higher false-positive classification. Overall, 41% of participants (n = 32) scored below threshold on at least one measure, but only 6% (n = 5) were below threshold across all four. Of four participants with a prior mild cognitive impairment (MCI) diagnosis, only one, who had more pronounced deficits, scored below threshold in all tests.
Conclusions: Despite strong inter-test correlations, substantial divergence in classification outcome was observed, particularly between MoCA and ACE-III. Reliance on a single screening instrument risks misclassification, with implications for both over- and under-diagnosis. Greater harmonization between screening tools is needed to improve diagnostic consistency. Clinical practice should therefore combine multiple-instrument approaches, potentially including premorbid function, and interpret screening test scores cautiously. Comprehensive neuropsychological assessment may provide a more complete picture, particularly in cases where diagnostic confidence is low, although this is not routine practice in all services.
早期发现认知能力下降是至关重要的,然而常用的筛查工具可能会产生不同的结果。本研究检查了四种广泛使用的工具在社区居住队列中的对齐。方法:从普通社区招募79名受试者,在标准化的实验室条件下进行评估,其中男39名,女40名,年龄为71.20,SD = 6.29。参与者完成了蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)和阿登布鲁克认知测试- iii (ACE-III),并根据MoCA记忆指数评分(MoCA- mis)和迷你阿登布鲁克认知测试(M-ACE)计算得分。检验一致性使用观察一致性和Cohen’s kappa进行检验,评分关系使用Pearson相关性进行评估。结果:除了一个测试对(M-ACE vs MoCA-MIS)外,所有测试对都显示出很强的评分相关性。然而,MoCA和ACE-III之间关于将参与者分类为低于阈值的协议只是公平的。与ACE-III相比,MoCA识别出的受损参与者数量是前者的两倍,这提高了灵敏度或假阳性分类的可能性。总体而言,41%的参与者(n = 32)在至少一项测试中得分低于阈值,但只有6% (n = 5)在所有四项测试中得分低于阈值。在先前诊断为轻度认知障碍(MCI)的四名参与者中,只有一名有更明显缺陷的参与者在所有测试中得分低于阈值。结论:尽管测试间存在很强的相关性,但在分类结果上观察到实质性的差异,特别是在MoCA和ACE-III之间。依赖单一筛查工具有分类错误的风险,对过度诊断和诊断不足都有影响。需要加强筛查工具之间的协调,以提高诊断的一致性。因此,临床实践应结合多种仪器方法,可能包括发病前功能,并谨慎解释筛查测试分数。全面的神经心理学评估可以提供更全面的情况,特别是在诊断可信度较低的情况下,尽管这不是所有服务的常规做法。
{"title":"Agreement between cognitive screening tools: a comparison of MoCA, ACE-III, M-ACE, and MoCA-MIS.","authors":"Monika McAtarsney-Kovacs, Raju Sapkota, Shahina Pardhan, Ian van der Linde","doi":"10.1080/13803395.2025.2596181","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2025.2596181","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Early detection of cognitive decline is critical, yet commonly used screening tools may yield divergent results. This study examined the alignment of four widely used instruments in a community-dwelling cohort.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Seventy-nine participants (M<sub>age</sub> = 71.20, SD = 6.29; 39 male, 40 female) were recruited from the general community and assessed under standardized laboratory conditions. Participants completed the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-III (ACE-III), from which scores for the MoCA Memory Index Score (MoCA-MIS) and the Mini-Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination (M-ACE) were also calculated. Test agreement was examined using observed agreement and Cohen's kappa, and score relationships were evaluated using Pearson correlations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All but one test pair (M-ACE vs MoCA-MIS) showed strong score correlations. However, agreement between MoCA and ACE-III for classifying participants as below threshold was only <i>fair</i>. MoCA identified twice as many participants as impaired compared with ACE-III, raising the possibility of either greater sensitivity or higher false-positive classification. Overall, 41% of participants (<i>n</i> = 32) scored below threshold on at least one measure, but only 6% (<i>n</i> = 5) were below threshold across all four. Of four participants with a prior mild cognitive impairment (MCI) diagnosis, only one, who had more pronounced deficits, scored below threshold in all tests.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite strong inter-test correlations, substantial divergence in classification outcome was observed, particularly between MoCA and ACE-III. Reliance on a single screening instrument risks misclassification, with implications for both over- and under-diagnosis. Greater harmonization between screening tools is needed to improve diagnostic consistency. Clinical practice should therefore combine multiple-instrument approaches, potentially including premorbid function, and interpret screening test scores cautiously. Comprehensive neuropsychological assessment may provide a more complete picture, particularly in cases where diagnostic confidence is low, although this is not routine practice in all services.</p>","PeriodicalId":15382,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145888976","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-31DOI: 10.1080/13803395.2025.2609824
Morgan D Tallman, Holly Timblin, Taylor Maynard, Brianna E Kelly, Rebecca K MacAulay
Objective: Subjective cognitive decline (SCD) is an important yet heterogeneous indicator of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia. Sex and health-related disparities in risk are well established, but differences in prevalence and conversion rates from SCD to MCI/Dementia by risk factor remain unclear.
Method: This preregistered study followed PRISMA guidelines to conduct a systematic review with a narrative synthesis and meta-analyses. Random-effects meta-analyses calculated the relative risk (RR) of sex, depression, hypertension, and diabetes in conversion from SCD to MCI/dementia. Q and I2 statistics investigated heterogeneity. Prevalence rates were also calculated.
Results: Five cross-cultural studies (N = 1136) were eligible for the meta-analyses. Participants, on average, had less than 12 years of education. Pooled analyses showed no significant differences in the RR of conversion for depression, hypertension, or diabetes. The pooled conversion rate of SCD to MCI was 17.2% and 8.7% to dementia. Evidence of heterogeneity suggested that the aggregated data may mask differences between studies; thus, unpublished conversion rates on comorbid SCD and the health conditions are reported to inform future research.
Conclusions: Relative risk estimates align with the greater literature and extend them to an inclusive cross-cultural sample with lower education. The significant heterogeneity found underscores the complexity of the interactions between cognitive decline and modifiable risk factors. This study provides novel conversion rates to MCI and dementia for individuals with comorbid SCD and depression, hypertension, and diabetes. We recommend that sex-stratified conversion rates are reported, as limited data prevented our meta-analysis from examining this important dimension of risk.
{"title":"Conversion of subjective cognitive decline to MCI and dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of sex differences and risk factors.","authors":"Morgan D Tallman, Holly Timblin, Taylor Maynard, Brianna E Kelly, Rebecca K MacAulay","doi":"10.1080/13803395.2025.2609824","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2025.2609824","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Subjective cognitive decline (SCD) is an important yet heterogeneous indicator of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia. Sex and health-related disparities in risk are well established, but differences in prevalence and conversion rates from SCD to MCI/Dementia by risk factor remain unclear.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This preregistered study followed PRISMA guidelines to conduct a systematic review with a narrative synthesis and meta-analyses. Random-effects meta-analyses calculated the relative risk (RR) of sex, depression, hypertension, and diabetes in conversion from SCD to MCI/dementia. Q and I<sup>2</sup> statistics investigated heterogeneity. Prevalence rates were also calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five cross-cultural studies (<i>N</i> = 1136) were eligible for the meta-analyses. Participants, on average, had less than 12 years of education. Pooled analyses showed no significant differences in the RR of conversion for depression, hypertension, or diabetes. The pooled conversion rate of SCD to MCI was 17.2% and 8.7% to dementia. Evidence of heterogeneity suggested that the aggregated data may mask differences between studies; thus, unpublished conversion rates on comorbid SCD and the health conditions are reported to inform future research.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Relative risk estimates align with the greater literature and extend them to an inclusive cross-cultural sample with lower education. The significant heterogeneity found underscores the complexity of the interactions between cognitive decline and modifiable risk factors. This study provides novel conversion rates to MCI and dementia for individuals with comorbid SCD and depression, hypertension, and diabetes. We recommend that sex-stratified conversion rates are reported, as limited data prevented our meta-analysis from examining this important dimension of risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":15382,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145862996","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: This study aimed to investigate the neurobehavioral differences in emotion regulation strategies between individuals with insomnia disorder (ID) and normal controls (NC) using electrophysiological (EEG) assessment, addressing the research gap in understanding how insomnia affects emotion regulation strategies.
Methods: Twenty-five individuals with subclinical insomnia disorder symptoms (ID group) and twenty-two normal controls (NC group) were recruited from local universities. Participants completed emotion regulation tasks using Neutral-View (NV) and Controlled Reappraisal (CR) strategies while undergoing EEG recording. Behavioral responses, EEG measures including frontal alpha asymmetry, Event-Related Potentials (ERPs), and frequency-domain analyses were collected and compared between groups.
Results: Behaviorally, the ID group showed longer response times when using NV versus CR strategy, while NC group showed no such difference. The ID group also reported lower arousal levels to emotional stimuli. Electrophysiologically, the ID group exhibited decreased frontal left-right alpha asymmetry and altered ERP components, including smaller N2, P2, and Late Positive Potential (LPP) amplitudes, but larger P3 amplitudes compared to NC group. Time-Frequency analysis revealed that ID group demonstrated greater theta power overall and enhanced posterior alpha power specifically when using CR strategy for negative images. In contrast, NC group showed distinct anterior-posterior beta power differences during NV strategy that were absent in ID group. Importantly, alpha oscillations correlated significantly with behavioral performance in NC group but not in ID group, suggesting altered brain-behavior coupling in insomnia.
Conclusions: These findings suggest that individuals with insomnia demonstrate distinct behavioral responses to top-down emotion regulation. The observed alterations in neural response patterns may serve as contributors to the persistence of both insomnia and associated emotional dysregulation.
{"title":"Emotion regulation strategies in subclinical insomnia: electrophysiological insights into neural processing differences.","authors":"Siyu Li, Zhuo Wang, Yun Li, Jiankun Su, Taotao Ru, Qingwei Chen, Guofu Zhou","doi":"10.1080/13803395.2025.2596936","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2025.2596936","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the neurobehavioral differences in emotion regulation strategies between individuals with insomnia disorder (ID) and normal controls (NC) using electrophysiological (EEG) assessment, addressing the research gap in understanding how insomnia affects emotion regulation strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-five individuals with subclinical insomnia disorder symptoms (ID group) and twenty-two normal controls (NC group) were recruited from local universities. Participants completed emotion regulation tasks using Neutral-View (NV) and Controlled Reappraisal (CR) strategies while undergoing EEG recording. Behavioral responses, EEG measures including frontal alpha asymmetry, Event-Related Potentials (ERPs), and frequency-domain analyses were collected and compared between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Behaviorally, the ID group showed longer response times when using NV versus CR strategy, while NC group showed no such difference. The ID group also reported lower arousal levels to emotional stimuli. Electrophysiologically, the ID group exhibited decreased frontal left-right alpha asymmetry and altered ERP components, including smaller N2, P2, and Late Positive Potential (LPP) amplitudes, but larger P3 amplitudes compared to NC group. Time-Frequency analysis revealed that ID group demonstrated greater theta power overall and enhanced posterior alpha power specifically when using CR strategy for negative images. In contrast, NC group showed distinct anterior-posterior beta power differences during NV strategy that were absent in ID group. Importantly, alpha oscillations correlated significantly with behavioral performance in NC group but not in ID group, suggesting altered brain-behavior coupling in insomnia.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest that individuals with insomnia demonstrate distinct behavioral responses to top-down emotion regulation. The observed alterations in neural response patterns may serve as contributors to the persistence of both insomnia and associated emotional dysregulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":15382,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145763007","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-12DOI: 10.1080/13803395.2025.2594593
Lesley A Guareña, Mary-Frances O'Connor, Matthew J Huentelman, Lee Ryan
Objective: Stress is a known risk factor for adverse cognitive outcomes; however, it remains unclear whether race/ethnicity is a moderating factor in the stress-cognition connection. In addition, the mechanisms underlying the influence of stress on learning and memory is an area of growing research, particularly among Hispanic/Latino individuals. The objective of this study was to investigate the associations between perceived stress, cardiometabolic risk, and learning and memory among matched Hispanic/Latino and non-Hispanic White individuals.
Methods: Cross-sectional data were obtained from the MindCrowd longitudinal observational online study from Hispanic/Latino (n = 91) and age, sex, and education matched non-Hispanic White adults (n = 95). Participants completed the 10-item Perceived Stress Scale and an online measure of learning and memory, the paired associates learning task. Linear regression models were built to investigate the effects of perceived stress, cardiometabolic risk and race/ethnicity on paired associates learning scores. Mediation between perceived stress and paired associates learning through cardiometabolic risk was tested.
Results: We found an inverse association between perceived stress and PAL scores among both Hispanic/Latino and non-Hispanic White groups (b = -.08, SE = .03, p = .007). The association between perceived stress and PAL scores was partially mediated by cardiometabolic risk (b = -.01, SE = .008, 95% CI [-.03, -.001]). The associations between perceived stress, cardiometabolic risk, and PAL scores did not differ by race/ethnicity (ps > .05). A mediation model moderated by race/ethnicity indicated no difference in the cardiometabolic risk mediation between perceived stress and PAL (b = .007, SE = .01, 95% CI [-.02, .03]).
Conclusion: Perceived stress is a risk factor for poorer paired associates learning scores among Hispanic/Latino and non-Hispanic White individuals. Cardiometabolic risk accounted for some of the association between perceived stress and paired associates learning performance. Further investigation is needed to better understand the complex mechanisms underlying stress-cognition associations among ethnically diverse samples.
目的:压力是已知的不良认知结果的危险因素;然而,目前尚不清楚种族/民族是否是压力认知联系的调节因素。此外,压力对学习和记忆影响的潜在机制是一个越来越多的研究领域,特别是在西班牙裔/拉丁裔人群中。本研究的目的是在匹配的西班牙裔/拉丁裔和非西班牙裔白人中调查感知压力、心脏代谢风险和学习记忆之间的关系。方法:从MindCrowd纵向观察在线研究中获得横断面数据,这些数据来自西班牙裔/拉丁裔(n = 91)和年龄、性别和教育程度相匹配的非西班牙裔白人成年人(n = 95)。参与者完成了10项感知压力量表和一项在线学习和记忆测试,即配对学习任务。建立线性回归模型来研究感知压力、心脏代谢风险和种族/民族对配对同伴学习分数的影响。通过心脏代谢风险测试感知压力与配对同伴学习之间的中介作用。结果:我们发现在西班牙裔/拉丁裔和非西班牙裔白人组中,感知压力与PAL评分呈负相关(b = - 0.08, SE =。03, p = .007)。感知应激与PAL评分之间的关联部分由心脏代谢风险介导(b = - 0.01, SE =。008, 95% ci[-.03, -.001])。感知压力、心脏代谢风险和PAL评分之间的关联没有因种族/民族而异(ps >.05)。一个由种族/民族调节的中介模型表明,感知压力和PAL之间的心脏代谢风险中介没有差异(b =。007, se =。01, 95% ci[-.02, .03])。结论:感知压力是西班牙裔/拉丁裔和非西班牙裔白人中较差的配对伙伴学习成绩的危险因素。心脏代谢风险在感知压力和配对同伴学习表现之间有一定的关联。需要进一步的研究来更好地理解不同种族样本中压力认知关联的复杂机制。
{"title":"Cardiometabolic risk mediates the association between perceived stress and learning and memory similarly among Hispanic/Latino and non-Hispanic White individuals.","authors":"Lesley A Guareña, Mary-Frances O'Connor, Matthew J Huentelman, Lee Ryan","doi":"10.1080/13803395.2025.2594593","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2025.2594593","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Stress is a known risk factor for adverse cognitive outcomes; however, it remains unclear whether race/ethnicity is a moderating factor in the stress-cognition connection. In addition, the mechanisms underlying the influence of stress on learning and memory is an area of growing research, particularly among Hispanic/Latino individuals. The objective of this study was to investigate the associations between perceived stress, cardiometabolic risk, and learning and memory among matched Hispanic/Latino and non-Hispanic White individuals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional data were obtained from the MindCrowd longitudinal observational online study from Hispanic/Latino (<i>n</i> = 91) and age, sex, and education matched non-Hispanic White adults (<i>n</i> = 95). Participants completed the 10-item Perceived Stress Scale and an online measure of learning and memory, the paired associates learning task. Linear regression models were built to investigate the effects of perceived stress, cardiometabolic risk and race/ethnicity on paired associates learning scores. Mediation between perceived stress and paired associates learning through cardiometabolic risk was tested.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found an inverse association between perceived stress and PAL scores among both Hispanic/Latino and non-Hispanic White groups (<i>b</i> = -.08, <i>SE</i> = .03, <i>p</i> = .007). The association between perceived stress and PAL scores was partially mediated by cardiometabolic risk (<i>b</i> = -.01, <i>SE</i> = .008, 95% <i>CI</i> [-.03, -.001]). The associations between perceived stress, cardiometabolic risk, and PAL scores did not differ by race/ethnicity (<i>ps</i> > .05). A mediation model moderated by race/ethnicity indicated no difference in the cardiometabolic risk mediation between perceived stress and PAL (<i>b</i> = .007, <i>SE</i> = .01, 95% <i>CI</i> [-.02, .03]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Perceived stress is a risk factor for poorer paired associates learning scores among Hispanic/Latino and non-Hispanic White individuals. Cardiometabolic risk accounted for some of the association between perceived stress and paired associates learning performance. Further investigation is needed to better understand the complex mechanisms underlying stress-cognition associations among ethnically diverse samples.</p>","PeriodicalId":15382,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145743024","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-10DOI: 10.1080/13803395.2025.2601677
Bryan M Freilich, Roee Holtzer
Objective: This study expands on the Montefiore Einstein Robust Geriatric (MERGER) norms by providing normative data for two word reading tests (WTAR, AMNART). We also developed regression-based prediction formulas for these tests using demographics and a novel measure of cognitive literacy engagement, establishing base rates for discrepancies between actual and predicted scores. Discrepancy base rates for global cognition, derived from regression-based norms using word reading and demographic factors, were also examined to support detection of cognitive decline.
Method: The MERGER sample included 420 community-dwelling older adults. Backward regression analyses predicted WTAR and AMNART scores. Base rates were calculated for discrepancies on the WTAR, AMNART, and the RBANS Global Cognition Index (GCI). One-way ANOVAs compared discrepancy scores across MERGER, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and dementia groups. Clinically meaningful cutoffs were set at the 10% base rate, and ROC curves assessed diagnostic accuracy.
Results: Normative data for WTAR and AMNART are presented. Cognitive literacy engagement significantly predicted both WTAR and AMNART scores, explaining small but significant variance. Base rate tables for discrepancies in word reading and GCI are provided. Mean discrepancies in the MERGER sample between actual and predicted word reading scores were near zero. ANOVAs showed MERGER participants had significantly smaller negative discrepancies than the MCI and dementia groups. For MCI detection, WTAR and AMNART discrepancies showed low sensitivity (17-24%) at 90% specificity. In the dementia group, sensitivities were fair (24-29%), improving in a subgroup diagnosed at their initial study visit (30-40%) with acceptable diagnostic accuracy.
Conclusions: This study provides normative data and discrepancy base rates for word reading and global cognition, enhancing the clinical applicability of MERGER norms. These results support more precise interpretation of word reading abilities in older adults, aiding in the differentiation of typical versus atypical cognitive profiles and improving diagnostic confidence when evaluating potential cognitive decline.
{"title":"Montefiore Einstein Robust Geriatric Normative Project (MERGER-NP): clinical decision rules for incorporating word reading into regression-based demographic norms and estimating premorbid cognitive functioning.","authors":"Bryan M Freilich, Roee Holtzer","doi":"10.1080/13803395.2025.2601677","DOIUrl":"10.1080/13803395.2025.2601677","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study expands on the Montefiore Einstein Robust Geriatric (MERGER) norms by providing normative data for two word reading tests (WTAR, AMNART). We also developed regression-based prediction formulas for these tests using demographics and a novel measure of cognitive literacy engagement, establishing base rates for discrepancies between actual and predicted scores. Discrepancy base rates for global cognition, derived from regression-based norms using word reading and demographic factors, were also examined to support detection of cognitive decline.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The MERGER sample included 420 community-dwelling older adults. Backward regression analyses predicted WTAR and AMNART scores. Base rates were calculated for discrepancies on the WTAR, AMNART, and the RBANS Global Cognition Index (GCI). One-way ANOVAs compared discrepancy scores across MERGER, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and dementia groups. Clinically meaningful cutoffs were set at the 10% base rate, and ROC curves assessed diagnostic accuracy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Normative data for WTAR and AMNART are presented. Cognitive literacy engagement significantly predicted both WTAR and AMNART scores, explaining small but significant variance. Base rate tables for discrepancies in word reading and GCI are provided. Mean discrepancies in the MERGER sample between actual and predicted word reading scores were near zero. ANOVAs showed MERGER participants had significantly smaller negative discrepancies than the MCI and dementia groups. For MCI detection, WTAR and AMNART discrepancies showed low sensitivity (17-24%) at 90% specificity. In the dementia group, sensitivities were fair (24-29%), improving in a subgroup diagnosed at their initial study visit (30-40%) with acceptable diagnostic accuracy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides normative data and discrepancy base rates for word reading and global cognition, enhancing the clinical applicability of MERGER norms. These results support more precise interpretation of word reading abilities in older adults, aiding in the differentiation of typical versus atypical cognitive profiles and improving diagnostic confidence when evaluating potential cognitive decline.</p>","PeriodicalId":15382,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145714611","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-10DOI: 10.1080/13803395.2025.2594596
Xinyi Deng, Shuo Wang, Yulin Wang, Xu Lei
Prior research has shown a strong association between insomnia and affective symptoms including depressive and anxiety symptoms. Rumination, defined as repetitive negative thinking, impacts both insomnia and affective symptoms. However, relying solely on self-reported sleep measures, it remains unclear whether rumination and affective symptoms interact with their subjective-objective sleep discrepancy (SOSD) rather than perceived sleep duration per se. SOSD is defined as a mismatch between perceived and objectively measured total sleep time (TST). Negative SOSD (i.e. underestimating TST) is a phenotype of sleep disturbance that increases the risk of insomnia in daily life. Therefore, the cross-sectional study investigated whether trait anxiety and depression influence SOSD performance in the presence of rumination. We measured SOSD using sleep diaries and actigraphy over five days, and assessed subjective sleep quality, rumination, depression, and trait anxiety through self-reported surveys. We further classified 672 participants (20.66 ± 1.89 years old; 68.0% female) into three SOSD groups: underestimating (UE), correctly estimating (CE), and overestimating (OE) TST. The results showed that the CE and UE groups had similar rumination levels, whereas the OE group exhibited significantly lower rumination. We found no differences in depression or trait anxiety across SOSD groups. Linear regression models showed that greater rumination and affective symptoms significantly and separately predicted lower SOSD values, and females showed more underestimation TST compared to males. When rumination was included, neither depression nor anxiety uniquely predicted SOSD, regardless of sex, though each overall model remained significant. These findings suggest that depression and anxiety share overlapping explanatory variance with rumination in relation to SOSD outcomes among young adults and interventions targeting rumination and affective symptoms may hold promise for populations with negative SOSD, especially for females.
{"title":"The impacts of rumination and affective symptoms on subjective-objective sleep discrepancy.","authors":"Xinyi Deng, Shuo Wang, Yulin Wang, Xu Lei","doi":"10.1080/13803395.2025.2594596","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2025.2594596","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prior research has shown a strong association between insomnia and affective symptoms including depressive and anxiety symptoms. Rumination, defined as repetitive negative thinking, impacts both insomnia and affective symptoms. However, relying solely on self-reported sleep measures, it remains unclear whether rumination and affective symptoms interact with their subjective-objective sleep discrepancy (SOSD) rather than perceived sleep duration per se. SOSD is defined as a mismatch between perceived and objectively measured total sleep time (TST). Negative SOSD (i.e. underestimating TST) is a phenotype of sleep disturbance that increases the risk of insomnia in daily life. Therefore, the cross-sectional study investigated whether trait anxiety and depression influence SOSD performance in the presence of rumination. We measured SOSD using sleep diaries and actigraphy over five days, and assessed subjective sleep quality, rumination, depression, and trait anxiety through self-reported surveys. We further classified 672 participants (20.66 ± 1.89 years old; 68.0% female) into three SOSD groups: underestimating (UE), correctly estimating (CE), and overestimating (OE) TST. The results showed that the CE and UE groups had similar rumination levels, whereas the OE group exhibited significantly lower rumination. We found no differences in depression or trait anxiety across SOSD groups. Linear regression models showed that greater rumination and affective symptoms significantly and separately predicted lower SOSD values, and females showed more underestimation TST compared to males. When rumination was included, neither depression nor anxiety uniquely predicted SOSD, regardless of sex, though each overall model remained significant. These findings suggest that depression and anxiety share overlapping explanatory variance with rumination in relation to SOSD outcomes among young adults and interventions targeting rumination and affective symptoms may hold promise for populations with negative SOSD, especially for females.</p>","PeriodicalId":15382,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145723238","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-08DOI: 10.1080/13803395.2025.2599256
Melina Arnold, Liang Cui, Mark Stemmler, Qi-Hao Guo
The new Chinese version of the SKT (Syndrom-Kurz-Test) Short Cognitive Performance Test aims to detect early cognitive impairment and is a promising addition to neuropsychological test batteries in China and suitable for Chinese speaking patients. This study has three aims: 1. to assess whether the SKT's diagnostic accuracy is comparable to established cognitive impairment tests (e.g. Addenbrooke´s cognitive examination-III (ACE-III) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment-Basic (MoCA-B)); 2. to examine whether the three tests show intra-individual differences according to different types of mild cognitive impairment (single-domain amnestic MCI, semantic MCI and multiple-domain amnestic MCI); 3. to determine whether these tests distinguish between individuals with no cognitive impairment and those with subjective cognitive decline (SCD). The validation sample included 1038 older adults (mean age = 70.04, SD = 6.05) from the Chinese Preclinical Alzheimer's Disease Study (C-PAS). Participants underwent cognitive testing and received consensus diagnoses of normal cognition, MCI, or dementia. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for each test. ANOVAs examined differences between MCI subtypes, and t-tests assessed group differences between normal cognition and SCD. Results: The SKT showed the highest discrimination between normal cognition and cognitive impairment (MCI or dementia), with a sensitivity of 85.4% and specificity of 69.8%. All three tests demonstrated significant score differences across MCI subtypes. Additionally, all tests significantly distinguished individuals with SCD from those without cognitive impairment (p < 0.01). Conclusions: The new Chinese produced weaker results than the established tests. However, given its strengths, it could be a useful tool for identifying cognitive impairment in certain situations.
SKT (syndrome - kurz -Test)短认知能力测试的新中文版旨在发现早期认知障碍,是中国神经心理测试系统的一个有希望的补充,适用于讲中文的患者。本研究有三个目的:1。评估SKT的诊断准确性是否与现有的认知障碍测试(如阿登布鲁克认知测试- iii (ACE-III)和蒙特利尔认知评估-基础(MoCA-B))相当;2. 根据不同轻度认知障碍类型(单域遗忘型轻度认知损伤、语义型轻度认知损伤和多域遗忘型轻度认知损伤),考察三项测试是否存在个体内差异;3. 以确定这些测试是否能区分无认知障碍和主观认知衰退(SCD)的个体。验证样本包括来自中国临床前阿尔茨海默病研究(C-PAS)的1038名老年人(平均年龄= 70.04,SD = 6.05)。参与者接受认知测试,并接受认知正常、轻度认知障碍或痴呆的一致诊断。计算每个试验的敏感性和特异性。方差分析检验MCI亚型之间的差异,t检验评估正常认知和SCD之间的组间差异。结果:SKT在正常认知和认知障碍(MCI或痴呆)之间的区分程度最高,敏感性为85.4%,特异性为69.8%。所有三种测试都显示出MCI亚型之间的显著得分差异。此外,所有测试都能显著区分SCD患者和无认知障碍患者(p
{"title":"The Chinese version of the Short Cognitive Performance Test (SKT) - psychometric criteria and cross-validation.","authors":"Melina Arnold, Liang Cui, Mark Stemmler, Qi-Hao Guo","doi":"10.1080/13803395.2025.2599256","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2025.2599256","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The new Chinese version of the SKT (Syndrom-Kurz-Test) Short Cognitive Performance Test aims to detect early cognitive impairment and is a promising addition to neuropsychological test batteries in China and suitable for Chinese speaking patients. This study has three aims: 1. to assess whether the SKT's diagnostic accuracy is comparable to established cognitive impairment tests (e.g. Addenbrooke´s cognitive examination-III (ACE-III) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment-Basic (MoCA-B)); 2. to examine whether the three tests show intra-individual differences according to different types of mild cognitive impairment (single-domain amnestic MCI, semantic MCI and multiple-domain amnestic MCI); 3. to determine whether these tests distinguish between individuals with no cognitive impairment and those with subjective cognitive decline (SCD). The validation sample included 1038 older adults (mean age = 70.04, SD = 6.05) from the Chinese Preclinical Alzheimer's Disease Study (C-PAS). Participants underwent cognitive testing and received consensus diagnoses of normal cognition, MCI, or dementia. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for each test. ANOVAs examined differences between MCI subtypes, and t-tests assessed group differences between normal cognition and SCD. Results: The SKT showed the highest discrimination between normal cognition and cognitive impairment (MCI or dementia), with a sensitivity of 85.4% and specificity of 69.8%. All three tests demonstrated significant score differences across MCI subtypes. Additionally, all tests significantly distinguished individuals with SCD from those without cognitive impairment (<i>p</i> < 0.01). Conclusions: The new Chinese produced weaker results than the established tests. However, given its strengths, it could be a useful tool for identifying cognitive impairment in certain situations.</p>","PeriodicalId":15382,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145708180","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The intricate role of sleep in sustaining critical physiological functions and preserving cognitive integrity is well-established. Inadequate sleep, whether in duration or quality, profoundly impairs fundamental cognitive functions, including memory consolidation, sustained attention, executive decision-making, and temporal perception. This study endeavors to explore the effects of short-term sleep restriction on subjective time perception employing both retrospective and prospective paradigms to unveil how acute sleep restriction reshapes temporal cognition in healthy adults. Following ethical approval, 31 healthy volunteers aged between 18 and 35 years participated. The experimental protocol which included assessments conducted under two conditions: after four consecutive nights of regular sleep and following three nights of sleep restriction, during which participants' sleep duration was reduced by two hours per night. Subjective time perception was evaluated using both retrospective and prospective time generation tasks (RTP and PTP). To assess cognitive performance, participants completed the Stroop test, which measures selective attention and cognitive flexibility, and the Wechsler Memory Scale-III (WMS-III), a validated instrument for evaluating short-term and working memory functions. The RTP after sleep restriction showed a significant prolongation compared to regular sleep duration (20.2 ± 8.8 vs 26.6 ± 12.3 sec, respectively; ANOVA p < 0.001). Short-term and working memory performances decreased after sleep restriction (10.8 ± 1.9 vs 10.0 ± 2.1 sec and 12.3 ± 2.1 vs 11.4 ± 2.3 sec respectively; ANOVA p ≤ 0.001 for both). Even moderate sleep restriction (e.g. a two-hour reduction) disrupts temporal cognition and memory, underscoring the critical need for sufficient sleep to sustain optimal cognitive performance in high-demand scenarios.
睡眠在维持关键生理功能和保持认知完整性方面的复杂作用已得到证实。睡眠不足,无论是持续时间还是质量,都会严重损害基本的认知功能,包括记忆巩固、持续注意力、执行决策和时间感知。本研究旨在探讨短期睡眠限制对主观时间感知的影响,采用回顾性和前瞻性两种范式来揭示急性睡眠限制如何重塑健康成人的时间认知。经伦理批准,31名年龄在18至35岁之间的健康志愿者参与了研究。实验方案包括在两种情况下进行的评估:连续四个晚上的正常睡眠和三个晚上的睡眠限制,在此期间参与者的睡眠时间每晚减少两个小时。采用回顾性和前瞻性时间生成任务(RTP和PTP)评估主观时间感知。为了评估认知表现,参与者完成了测量选择性注意力和认知灵活性的Stroop测试,以及韦氏记忆量表iii (WMS-III),这是一种评估短期和工作记忆功能的有效工具。与正常睡眠时间相比,睡眠限制后的RTP显着延长(分别为20.2±8.8 vs 26.6±12.3秒;方差分析p≤0.001)。即使是适度的睡眠限制(例如减少两小时)也会扰乱时间认知和记忆,这强调了在高需求场景下保持最佳认知表现对充足睡眠的迫切需求。
{"title":"Altered subjective time perception and cognitive performance following three days of sleep restriction in healthy adults.","authors":"Gülhan Cansu Şen, Nurcan Erdoğan Kurtaran, Levent Öztürk","doi":"10.1080/13803395.2025.2596925","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2025.2596925","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The intricate role of sleep in sustaining critical physiological functions and preserving cognitive integrity is well-established. Inadequate sleep, whether in duration or quality, profoundly impairs fundamental cognitive functions, including memory consolidation, sustained attention, executive decision-making, and temporal perception. This study endeavors to explore the effects of short-term sleep restriction on subjective time perception employing both retrospective and prospective paradigms to unveil how acute sleep restriction reshapes temporal cognition in healthy adults. Following ethical approval, 31 healthy volunteers aged between 18 and 35 years participated. The experimental protocol which included assessments conducted under two conditions: after four consecutive nights of regular sleep and following three nights of sleep restriction, during which participants' sleep duration was reduced by two hours per night. Subjective time perception was evaluated using both retrospective and prospective time generation tasks (RTP and PTP). To assess cognitive performance, participants completed the Stroop test, which measures selective attention and cognitive flexibility, and the Wechsler Memory Scale-III (WMS-III), a validated instrument for evaluating short-term and working memory functions. The RTP after sleep restriction showed a significant prolongation compared to regular sleep duration (20.2 ± 8.8 vs 26.6 ± 12.3 sec, respectively; ANOVA <i>p</i> < 0.001). Short-term and working memory performances decreased after sleep restriction (10.8 ± 1.9 vs 10.0 ± 2.1 sec and 12.3 ± 2.1 vs 11.4 ± 2.3 sec respectively; ANOVA <i>p</i> ≤ 0.001 for both). Even moderate sleep restriction (e.g. a two-hour reduction) disrupts temporal cognition and memory, underscoring the critical need for sufficient sleep to sustain optimal cognitive performance in high-demand scenarios.</p>","PeriodicalId":15382,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145633987","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-27DOI: 10.1080/13803395.2025.2591895
Averi Giudicessi, Elouise Koops, Clara Vila-Castelar, Lusiana Martinez, Nadeshka Ramirez-Perez, George Silva, Randy Medrano, Jairo E Martinez, Isabel Solis, Jorge Alcina, Catarina Tristão-Pereira, Marta Gonzalez Catalan, Daniel G Saldana, Liliana Ramírez-Gómez, Alice Cronin-Golomb, Yakeel T Quiroz
Background: Women face disproportionately high Alzheimer's disease (AD) rates, with Latina women experiencing particularly elevated cognitive impairment rates. Understanding reproductive factors' impact on brain aging is critical for this underrepresented population. Given sex disparities in AD and reproductive factor influence on brain aging, we examined relations among reproductive history, white matter integrity, and cognitive function in post-menopausal Latina women.
Methods: Participants were 95 post-menopausal Latina women from the Boston Latino Aging Study, mean age 65.7 (SD = 6.5) years and 11.7 (SD = 4.8) years of education. Reproductive history was obtained via self-report questionnaire. Cognitive assessment included Mini-Mental State Examination, Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test, Category Fluency, Story Memory Delayed Recall, and Symbol Digit Modalities Test administered in Spanish or Portuguese. White matter microstructure was assessed with diffusion weighted imaging using fixel-based methods. Regression models tested associations among reproductive factors, cognitive and imaging outcomes, adjusting for age, education, and cardiovascular risk. Mediation analyses evaluated whether white matter abnormalities explained reproductive-cognitive relations.
Results: Pregnancy history was associated with worse delayed recall, with women having 1-2 (β = -0.79, p = .016) and 3-4 term pregnancies (β = -0.93, p = .005) performing worse than nulliparous women. Overall, hormone replacement therapy use was associated with better delayed recall (β = 0.58, p = .037). White matter analyses revealed trends suggesting pregnancy-related reductions in fiber density and cross-section across multiple tracts, with 3-4 term pregnancies showing most consistent patterns. Hysterectomy showed trends toward higher fiber density in several tracts. Mediation analyses indicated white matter integrity did not account for reproductive-cognitive associations.
Conclusions: Reproductive history, particularly pregnancy number, is associated with cognitive performance and white matter microstructure in post-menopausal Latina women. These findings underscore the importance of considering reproductive factors in AD risk assessment and highlight the need for longitudinal studies to clarify mechanisms driving these associations.
背景:女性面临着不成比例的高阿尔茨海默病(AD)发病率,拉丁裔女性的认知障碍发病率尤其高。了解生殖因素对大脑衰老的影响对这一代表性不足的人群至关重要。考虑到AD的性别差异和生殖因素对脑衰老的影响,我们研究了绝经后拉丁裔妇女的生殖史、白质完整性和认知功能之间的关系。方法:参与者为来自波士顿拉丁裔老龄化研究的95名绝经后拉丁裔妇女,平均年龄为65.7 (SD = 6.5)岁,平均受教育年限为11.7 (SD = 4.8)年。通过自述问卷获得生殖史。认知评估包括以西班牙语或葡萄牙语进行的迷你精神状态测试、自由和线索选择性提醒测试、类别流畅性、故事记忆延迟回忆和符号数字模态测试。采用基于固定体的扩散加权成像方法评估白质微观结构。回归模型检验了生殖因素、认知和影像学结果、年龄、教育程度和心血管风险之间的关联。中介分析评估了白质异常是否解释了生殖-认知关系。结果:妊娠史与较差的延迟回忆相关,女性有1-2个延迟回忆(β = -0.79, p =。016)和3-4个足月妊娠(β = -0.93, p =。2005)表现不如未生育妇女。总的来说,激素替代疗法的使用与更好的延迟回忆相关(β = 0.58, p = 0.037)。白质分析揭示了怀孕相关的纤维密度和多束横断面减少的趋势,3-4个月的怀孕表现出最一致的模式。子宫切除术显示出几个束纤维密度增高的趋势。调解分析表明,白质完整性不能解释生殖-认知关联。结论:生殖史,特别是怀孕次数,与绝经后拉丁裔妇女的认知能力和白质微观结构有关。这些发现强调了在阿尔茨海默病风险评估中考虑生殖因素的重要性,并强调了进行纵向研究以阐明驱动这些关联的机制的必要性。
{"title":"Association between reproductive history, white matter integrity, and cognition in post-menopausal Latina women from the Boston Latino Aging Study.","authors":"Averi Giudicessi, Elouise Koops, Clara Vila-Castelar, Lusiana Martinez, Nadeshka Ramirez-Perez, George Silva, Randy Medrano, Jairo E Martinez, Isabel Solis, Jorge Alcina, Catarina Tristão-Pereira, Marta Gonzalez Catalan, Daniel G Saldana, Liliana Ramírez-Gómez, Alice Cronin-Golomb, Yakeel T Quiroz","doi":"10.1080/13803395.2025.2591895","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2025.2591895","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Women face disproportionately high Alzheimer's disease (AD) rates, with Latina women experiencing particularly elevated cognitive impairment rates. Understanding reproductive factors' impact on brain aging is critical for this underrepresented population. Given sex disparities in AD and reproductive factor influence on brain aging, we examined relations among reproductive history, white matter integrity, and cognitive function in post-menopausal Latina women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were 95 post-menopausal Latina women from the Boston Latino Aging Study, mean age 65.7 (SD = 6.5) years and 11.7 (SD = 4.8) years of education. Reproductive history was obtained via self-report questionnaire. Cognitive assessment included Mini-Mental State Examination, Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test, Category Fluency, Story Memory Delayed Recall, and Symbol Digit Modalities Test administered in Spanish or Portuguese. White matter microstructure was assessed with diffusion weighted imaging using fixel-based methods. Regression models tested associations among reproductive factors, cognitive and imaging outcomes, adjusting for age, education, and cardiovascular risk. Mediation analyses evaluated whether white matter abnormalities explained reproductive-cognitive relations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pregnancy history was associated with worse delayed recall, with women having 1-2 (β = -0.79, <i>p</i> = .016) and 3-4 term pregnancies (β = -0.93, <i>p</i> = .005) performing worse than nulliparous women. Overall, hormone replacement therapy use was associated with better delayed recall (β = 0.58, <i>p</i> = .037). White matter analyses revealed trends suggesting pregnancy-related reductions in fiber density and cross-section across multiple tracts, with 3-4 term pregnancies showing most consistent patterns. Hysterectomy showed trends toward higher fiber density in several tracts. Mediation analyses indicated white matter integrity did not account for reproductive-cognitive associations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Reproductive history, particularly pregnancy number, is associated with cognitive performance and white matter microstructure in post-menopausal Latina women. These findings underscore the importance of considering reproductive factors in AD risk assessment and highlight the need for longitudinal studies to clarify mechanisms driving these associations.</p>","PeriodicalId":15382,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145633917","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}