Correlation between thyroid dysfunction and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with advanced solid tumors.

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Discover. Oncology Pub Date : 2024-11-16 DOI:10.1007/s12672-024-01546-4
Cheng Zhao
{"title":"Correlation between thyroid dysfunction and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with advanced solid tumors.","authors":"Cheng Zhao","doi":"10.1007/s12672-024-01546-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are currently the first line of tumor immunotherapy for the treatment of a wide range of tumors. However, the main side effect of immune checkpoint inhibitors is that they cause immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in patients. The relationship between the occurrence of immune side effects in patients and efficacy is controversial. The objective of this study was to confirm the relationship between patients who develop thyroid dysfunction after immune checkpoint inhibitors and efficacy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was a retrospective real-world clinical study, and a total of 50 patients with advanced tumors treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors at Anqing People's Hospital from 2020.8 to 2022.5 were retrospectively collected. Among them, 30 patients with hypothyroidism and 20 patients with normal or hyperthyroidism occurred, and the treatment effects and prognostic differences between the two groups were compared.</p><p><strong>Finding: </strong>After PD1 treatment in all patients, there were 10 cases of partial remission(PR), 18 cases of stable disease(SD) and 2 cases of progressive disease(PD) in patients who developed hypothyroidism, with a disease control rate(DCR) of 93.3% and objective remission rate(ORR) of 33.3%. There were 0 complete remission (CR) patient, 3 PR patients, 11 SD patients, 6 PD patients, 70.0% DCR and 15.0% ORR in patients who did not develop hypothyroidism. The DCR and ORR of patients who developed hypothyroidism were better than those of non-hypothyroid patients, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that progression-free survival (PFS) reached 9.2 months (95% CI 7.726-10.779) in patients who developed hypothyroidism and did not hypothyroidism patients have a PFS of 7.3 months (95% CI 5.604-8.505), with a statistically significant difference (P = 0.0341 < 0.05). Further subgroup analysis revealed that among patients who developed hypothyroidism, PFS was 3.3 months (95% CI 0.630-5.440) in patients with cholangiocarcinoma, 6.89 months (95% CI 5.604-8.505) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer, > 12 months in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, and 11.05 months (95% CI 9.308-12.792) in patients with esophageal cancer months and PFS for patients with gastric cancer was 9.74 months (95% CI 6.979-12.502).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>When patients with advanced tumors were treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors, DCR and ORR were higher in patients who developed hypothyroidism, and patients had better PFS. The benefits were greater in patients with gastric, esophageal, and hepatocellular carcinomas.</p>","PeriodicalId":11148,"journal":{"name":"Discover. Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Discover. Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12672-024-01546-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are currently the first line of tumor immunotherapy for the treatment of a wide range of tumors. However, the main side effect of immune checkpoint inhibitors is that they cause immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in patients. The relationship between the occurrence of immune side effects in patients and efficacy is controversial. The objective of this study was to confirm the relationship between patients who develop thyroid dysfunction after immune checkpoint inhibitors and efficacy.

Methods: This study was a retrospective real-world clinical study, and a total of 50 patients with advanced tumors treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors at Anqing People's Hospital from 2020.8 to 2022.5 were retrospectively collected. Among them, 30 patients with hypothyroidism and 20 patients with normal or hyperthyroidism occurred, and the treatment effects and prognostic differences between the two groups were compared.

Finding: After PD1 treatment in all patients, there were 10 cases of partial remission(PR), 18 cases of stable disease(SD) and 2 cases of progressive disease(PD) in patients who developed hypothyroidism, with a disease control rate(DCR) of 93.3% and objective remission rate(ORR) of 33.3%. There were 0 complete remission (CR) patient, 3 PR patients, 11 SD patients, 6 PD patients, 70.0% DCR and 15.0% ORR in patients who did not develop hypothyroidism. The DCR and ORR of patients who developed hypothyroidism were better than those of non-hypothyroid patients, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that progression-free survival (PFS) reached 9.2 months (95% CI 7.726-10.779) in patients who developed hypothyroidism and did not hypothyroidism patients have a PFS of 7.3 months (95% CI 5.604-8.505), with a statistically significant difference (P = 0.0341 < 0.05). Further subgroup analysis revealed that among patients who developed hypothyroidism, PFS was 3.3 months (95% CI 0.630-5.440) in patients with cholangiocarcinoma, 6.89 months (95% CI 5.604-8.505) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer, > 12 months in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, and 11.05 months (95% CI 9.308-12.792) in patients with esophageal cancer months and PFS for patients with gastric cancer was 9.74 months (95% CI 6.979-12.502).

Interpretation: When patients with advanced tumors were treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors, DCR and ORR were higher in patients who developed hypothyroidism, and patients had better PFS. The benefits were greater in patients with gastric, esophageal, and hepatocellular carcinomas.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
晚期实体瘤患者甲状腺功能障碍与免疫检查点抑制剂疗效之间的相关性。
背景:免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)是目前治疗各种肿瘤的一线肿瘤免疫疗法。然而,免疫检查点抑制剂的主要副作用是导致患者出现免疫相关不良事件(irAEs)。患者发生免疫副作用与疗效之间的关系尚存争议。本研究旨在确认服用免疫检查点抑制剂后出现甲状腺功能障碍的患者与疗效之间的关系:本研究为回顾性真实世界临床研究,共回顾性收集2020.8-2022.5年安庆市人民医院使用免疫检查点抑制剂治疗的50例晚期肿瘤患者。其中,甲状腺功能减退患者30例,甲状腺功能正常或亢进患者20例,比较两组患者的治疗效果和预后差异:所有患者经PD1治疗后,甲减患者部分缓解(PR)10例,疾病稳定(SD)18例,疾病进展(PD)2例,疾病控制率(DCR)93.3%,客观缓解率(ORR)33.3%。未出现甲减的患者中,完全缓解(CR)患者为 0 人,PR 患者为 3 人,SD 患者为 11 人,PD 患者为 6 人,疾病控制率(DCR)为 70.0%,客观缓解率(ORR)为 15.0%。发生甲减的患者的DCR和ORR均优于未发生甲减的患者,且差异有统计学意义(肝细胞癌患者的P为12个月,食管癌患者的P为11.05个月(95% CI为9.308-12.792),胃癌患者的PFS为9.74个月(95% CI为6.979-12.502):当晚期肿瘤患者接受免疫检查点抑制剂治疗时,甲状腺功能减退症患者的DCR和ORR更高,患者的PFS更好。胃癌、食管癌和肝癌患者的获益更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Discover. Oncology
Discover. Oncology Medicine-Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
122
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊最新文献
Circ_0124346 facilitates cell proliferation of pancreatic adenocarcinoma cells by regulating lipid metabolism via miR-223-3p/ACSL3 axis. Integrated single-cell analysis reveals heterogeneity and therapeutic insights in osteosarcoma. TMSB4X is a regulator of inflammation-associated ferroptosis, and promotes the proliferation, migration and invasion of hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Construction of a novel lipid drop-mitochondria-associated genetic profile for predicting the survival and prognosis of lung adenocarcinoma. Correlation between thyroid dysfunction and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with advanced solid tumors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1