Prevalence of and Risk Factors for Hearing Impairment in Craniofacial Microsomia

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.joms.2024.10.011
Danique van Dop BSc , Cornelia J.J.M. Caron MD, DMD, PhD , Lisa Nussbaum MA, MBA , Cory M. Resnick MD, DMD
{"title":"Prevalence of and Risk Factors for Hearing Impairment in Craniofacial Microsomia","authors":"Danique van Dop BSc ,&nbsp;Cornelia J.J.M. Caron MD, DMD, PhD ,&nbsp;Lisa Nussbaum MA, MBA ,&nbsp;Cory M. Resnick MD, DMD","doi":"10.1016/j.joms.2024.10.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>While ear anomalies and hearing impairment are common in patients with craniofacial microsomia (CFM), their prevalence, characteristics, and relationship to speech-language development remain unclear.</div></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>This study analyzed the prevalence and risk factors for hearing impairment in patients with CFM.</div></div><div><h3>Study Design, Setting, Sample</h3><div>This retrospective cohort study included patients with unilateral or bilateral CFM from a single center between January 1980 and July 2023 who had evidence of a hearing assessment at &lt;18 years. Exclusion criteria were inconclusive CFM diagnosis by clinical examination and/or radiographs or incomplete medical records.</div></div><div><h3>Predictor Variable</h3><div>The predictor variables included presence or absence of cleft lip and/or palate, laterality of CFM, and external ear and mandibular anomaly scores measured using the Orbit, Mandible, Ear, Nerve, and Soft Tissue and Pruzansky-Kaban classifications.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Variables</h3><div>Primary outcome variable was hearing impairment, measured through air and bone conduction audiometry and categorized by type, severity, and side. Secondary outcome variable was speech-language delay, evaluated through assessments of expressive and receptive language skills, vocabulary, speech intelligibility, general articulation, and phonological speech.</div></div><div><h3>Covariates</h3><div>The covariates included sex and age at first hearing assessment.</div></div><div><h3>Analyses</h3><div>Logistic regression models were used to analyze the effect of predictors on outcomes. <em>P</em> value &lt;.05 was considered significant.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The sample included 213 patients (61.5% male). Hearing assessments were performed at a mean age of 4.6 ± 4.8 years. Hearing impairment was found in 183 (85.9%) and was predominantly conductive (n = 130, 91.5%). Of subjects with hearing impairment, 158 (86.3%) had external ear anomalies (<em>P</em> &lt; .001). In patients with unilateral CFM, 38 (21.8%) had bilateral hearing loss and 9 (5.2%) had contralateral-only hearing loss. Both M3 and E3 scores were associated with the presence and severity of hearing loss (<em>P</em> = .01 and <em>P</em> &lt; .001, respectively). There was no significant association between hearing impairment and speech-language development (<em>P</em> &gt; .05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion and Relevance</h3><div>Although the severity of mandibular and external ear anomalies was significantly associated with the prevalence and severity of hearing loss, clinicians should remain alert for concomitant or isolated contralateral hearing loss, given the high prevalence of hearing loss in ears without ipsilateral facial involvement or external abnormalities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16612,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":"83 2","pages":"Pages 167-176"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278239124009078","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

While ear anomalies and hearing impairment are common in patients with craniofacial microsomia (CFM), their prevalence, characteristics, and relationship to speech-language development remain unclear.

Purpose

This study analyzed the prevalence and risk factors for hearing impairment in patients with CFM.

Study Design, Setting, Sample

This retrospective cohort study included patients with unilateral or bilateral CFM from a single center between January 1980 and July 2023 who had evidence of a hearing assessment at <18 years. Exclusion criteria were inconclusive CFM diagnosis by clinical examination and/or radiographs or incomplete medical records.

Predictor Variable

The predictor variables included presence or absence of cleft lip and/or palate, laterality of CFM, and external ear and mandibular anomaly scores measured using the Orbit, Mandible, Ear, Nerve, and Soft Tissue and Pruzansky-Kaban classifications.

Main Outcome Variables

Primary outcome variable was hearing impairment, measured through air and bone conduction audiometry and categorized by type, severity, and side. Secondary outcome variable was speech-language delay, evaluated through assessments of expressive and receptive language skills, vocabulary, speech intelligibility, general articulation, and phonological speech.

Covariates

The covariates included sex and age at first hearing assessment.

Analyses

Logistic regression models were used to analyze the effect of predictors on outcomes. P value <.05 was considered significant.

Results

The sample included 213 patients (61.5% male). Hearing assessments were performed at a mean age of 4.6 ± 4.8 years. Hearing impairment was found in 183 (85.9%) and was predominantly conductive (n = 130, 91.5%). Of subjects with hearing impairment, 158 (86.3%) had external ear anomalies (P < .001). In patients with unilateral CFM, 38 (21.8%) had bilateral hearing loss and 9 (5.2%) had contralateral-only hearing loss. Both M3 and E3 scores were associated with the presence and severity of hearing loss (P = .01 and P < .001, respectively). There was no significant association between hearing impairment and speech-language development (P > .05).

Conclusion and Relevance

Although the severity of mandibular and external ear anomalies was significantly associated with the prevalence and severity of hearing loss, clinicians should remain alert for concomitant or isolated contralateral hearing loss, given the high prevalence of hearing loss in ears without ipsilateral facial involvement or external abnormalities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
颅面小畸形听力障碍的患病率和风险因素。
背景:目的:本研究分析了颅面显微畸形(CFM)患者听力障碍的发生率和风险因素:这项回顾性队列研究纳入了1980年1月至2023年7月期间来自一个中心的单侧或双侧CFM患者,这些患者在听力评估时均有证据:预测变量包括是否存在唇裂和/或腭裂、CFM的侧位、使用眼眶、下颌骨、耳、神经和软组织以及普鲁赞斯基-卡班分类法测量的外耳和下颌骨异常评分:主要结果变量是听力损伤,通过气导和骨导听力测量法测量,并按类型、严重程度和一侧进行分类。次要结果变量为语言发育迟缓,通过对语言表达和接受能力、词汇量、语言清晰度、一般发音和语音进行评估:协变量包括性别和首次听力评估时的年龄:分析:采用逻辑回归模型分析预测因素对结果的影响。P 值 结果样本包括 213 名患者(61.5% 为男性)。进行听力评估的平均年龄为 4.6 ± 4.8 岁。183人(85.9%)存在听力障碍,主要为传导性听力障碍(130人,91.5%)。在有听力障碍的受试者中,158 人(86.3%)有外耳异常(P .05):尽管下颌骨和外耳异常的严重程度与听力损失的发生率和严重程度有显著相关性,但鉴于同侧面部未受累或外耳异常的听力损失发生率较高,临床医生仍应警惕并发或孤立的对侧听力损失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: This monthly journal offers comprehensive coverage of new techniques, important developments and innovative ideas in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Practice-applicable articles help develop the methods used to handle dentoalveolar surgery, facial injuries and deformities, TMJ disorders, oral cancer, jaw reconstruction, anesthesia and analgesia. The journal also includes specifics on new instruments and diagnostic equipment and modern therapeutic drugs and devices. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery is recommended for first or priority subscription by the Dental Section of the Medical Library Association.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Lip Revision Rates in Traditional Versus Early Cleft Lip Repair: An Institutional Review. Is A Surgeon's Self-Perceived Level of Anxiety Associated With the Type of Surgical Procedure Being Performed? Editorial Board Masthead Table of Contents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1