The negative association of low subjective socioeconomic status with future orientation: the protective role of low fatalism.

IF 2.7 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY BMC Psychology Pub Date : 2024-11-15 DOI:10.1186/s40359-024-02173-y
Lingling Shu, Tianzi Gong, Yuting Wang, Qinggong Li, Zhiwen Xie
{"title":"The negative association of low subjective socioeconomic status with future orientation: the protective role of low fatalism.","authors":"Lingling Shu, Tianzi Gong, Yuting Wang, Qinggong Li, Zhiwen Xie","doi":"10.1186/s40359-024-02173-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Subjective socioeconomic status (SES), an individual's beliefs about his or her social class, is anticipated to be related to future orientation. This study proposed a moderation model to examine the relationship between subjective SES on future orientation and the protective role of low fatalism.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two studies were conducted to test the proposed model. Specifically, in Study 1, the structured questionnaires were administered to a sample comprising 217 Chinese participants (192 females, M<sub>age</sub> = 18.24 ± 0.63). In Study 2, the structured questionnaires and an Imaginative Scenario Test were administered to collect data among 244 Chinese participants (167 females, M<sub>age</sub> = 18.44 ± 0.73). Regression analyses were used to explore the moderating role of fatalism in the association between subjective SES on future orientation. The Bootstrap methods were used to test the significance of these moderating effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results revealed two primary findings: (1) Fatalism moderated the pathway from subjective SES to future orientation. Specifically, low fatalism served as a protective factor, making low subjective SES less disruptive to their future orientation. (2) The moderating effect was primarily attributed to the \"luck dimension\", which was the belief that luck plays a pivotal role in determining one's fate.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings contribute to enriching the current understanding of the subjective SES on future orientation and the protective role of low fatalism.</p>","PeriodicalId":37867,"journal":{"name":"BMC Psychology","volume":"12 1","pages":"664"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11568625/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-02173-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Subjective socioeconomic status (SES), an individual's beliefs about his or her social class, is anticipated to be related to future orientation. This study proposed a moderation model to examine the relationship between subjective SES on future orientation and the protective role of low fatalism.

Methods: Two studies were conducted to test the proposed model. Specifically, in Study 1, the structured questionnaires were administered to a sample comprising 217 Chinese participants (192 females, Mage = 18.24 ± 0.63). In Study 2, the structured questionnaires and an Imaginative Scenario Test were administered to collect data among 244 Chinese participants (167 females, Mage = 18.44 ± 0.73). Regression analyses were used to explore the moderating role of fatalism in the association between subjective SES on future orientation. The Bootstrap methods were used to test the significance of these moderating effects.

Results: The results revealed two primary findings: (1) Fatalism moderated the pathway from subjective SES to future orientation. Specifically, low fatalism served as a protective factor, making low subjective SES less disruptive to their future orientation. (2) The moderating effect was primarily attributed to the "luck dimension", which was the belief that luck plays a pivotal role in determining one's fate.

Conclusions: The findings contribute to enriching the current understanding of the subjective SES on future orientation and the protective role of low fatalism.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
低主观社会经济地位与未来取向的负相关:低宿命论的保护作用。
背景:主观社会经济地位(SES),即个人对其社会阶层的看法,预计与未来取向有关。本研究提出了一个调节模型来研究主观社会经济地位与未来取向之间的关系以及低宿命论的保护作用:方法:为验证所提出的模型,我们进行了两项研究。具体来说,在研究 1 中,对 217 名中国参与者(192 名女性,年龄 = 18.24 ± 0.63)进行了结构化问卷调查。在研究 2 中,我们对 244 名中国参与者(167 名女性,年龄 = 18.44 ± 0.73)进行了结构化问卷调查和想象情景测试。回归分析用于探讨宿命论在主观社会经济地位与未来取向之间的调节作用。使用 Bootstrap 方法检验了这些调节作用的显著性:结果显示了两个主要发现:(1)宿命论调节了从主观社会经济地位到未来取向的路径。具体来说,低宿命论是一个保护性因素,它使低主观社会经济地位对未来取向的影响较小。(2)调节作用主要归因于 "运气维度",即认为运气在决定一个人的命运中起着关键作用:研究结果有助于丰富当前对主观社会经济地位对未来取向的影响以及低宿命论的保护作用的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Psychology
BMC Psychology Psychology-Psychology (all)
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
2.80%
发文量
265
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Psychology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers manuscripts on all aspects of psychology, human behavior and the mind, including developmental, clinical, cognitive, experimental, health and social psychology, as well as personality and individual differences. The journal welcomes quantitative and qualitative research methods, including animal studies.
期刊最新文献
Beyond chronological age: exploring how different future time perspective influences the health tourism intention. A assessment of the effects of parental age on the development of autism in children: a systematic review and a meta-analysis. Optimizing parenting and child outcomes following parent-child interaction therapy - toddler: a randomized controlled trial. Psychological dynamics of overqualification: career anxiety and decision commitment in STEM. Distraction or motivation? Unraveling the role of fear of missing out on college students' learning engagement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1