Participant acceptability and clinician satisfaction of cognitive behavioural therapy and medication management algorithm compared with enhanced standard care for treatment of depression among youth with HIV.

IF 0.3 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Journal of Child and Adolescent Mental Health Pub Date : 2024-11-17 DOI:10.2989/17280583.2024.2387632
Emily A Barr, Kristin Baltrusaitis, Betsy D Kennard, Graham J Emslie, Chelsea Krotje, Kevin Knowles, Sarah Buisson, Lauren Bergam, Jaime G Deville, Susan L Gillespie, Melissa Shikora, Ellen Townley, David E Shapiro, Larry K Brown
{"title":"Participant acceptability and clinician satisfaction of cognitive behavioural therapy and medication management algorithm compared with enhanced standard care for treatment of depression among youth with HIV.","authors":"Emily A Barr, Kristin Baltrusaitis, Betsy D Kennard, Graham J Emslie, Chelsea Krotje, Kevin Knowles, Sarah Buisson, Lauren Bergam, Jaime G Deville, Susan L Gillespie, Melissa Shikora, Ellen Townley, David E Shapiro, Larry K Brown","doi":"10.2989/17280583.2024.2387632","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background:</i> Primary results of the International Maternal Pediatric Adolescent AIDS Clinical Trials Network (IMPAACT) 2002 trial showed that cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) and medication management algorithm (MMA) (COMB-R) significantly improved depression in youth with HIV (YWH) compared with enhanced standard care (ESC). Acceptability and satisfaction were examined among study participants and clinicians.<i>Method:</i> Between March 2017 and March 2019, 13 U.S. sites enrolled YWH, aged 12-24, diagnosed with nonpsychotic depression. Sites were randomised to either COMB-R (CBT by a therapist and licensed prescriber) or ESC (standard psychotherapy and medication management). After the intervention (week 24), participants, prescribers, and therapists rated acceptability and satisfaction. We compared site-level means using Wilcoxon tests.<i>Results:</i> Both COMB-R (<i>n</i> = 69) and ESC (<i>n</i> = 71) participants had a mean age of 21.4 years, with 53% female, and 54% having acquired HIV perinatally. Baseline age, sex, depression levels, RNA viral load, and CD4 count were comparable between arms. The distribution of site-level mean participant acceptability was greater in COMB-R compared with ESC (<i>p</i> = 0.04). The distribution of site-level mean prescriber satisfaction was greater in COMB-R (<i>p</i> = 0.01). The was no evidence that the site-level mean therapist satisfaction did not differ between arms (<i>p</i> = 0.52).<i>Discussion:</i> Acceptability and satisfaction for participants and licensed prescribers were higher at COMB-R sites compared with standard of care, indicating that this tailored, manual-guided, collaborative, measured care intervention was less burdensome in terms of the number of visits. Patient and medication provider satisfaction rates were higher than standard of care.<i>Conclusion:</i> While these results support the use of CBT and MMA in treating depression among YWH, further research is required to determine generalisability.</p>","PeriodicalId":45290,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Child and Adolescent Mental Health","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Child and Adolescent Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2989/17280583.2024.2387632","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Primary results of the International Maternal Pediatric Adolescent AIDS Clinical Trials Network (IMPAACT) 2002 trial showed that cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) and medication management algorithm (MMA) (COMB-R) significantly improved depression in youth with HIV (YWH) compared with enhanced standard care (ESC). Acceptability and satisfaction were examined among study participants and clinicians.Method: Between March 2017 and March 2019, 13 U.S. sites enrolled YWH, aged 12-24, diagnosed with nonpsychotic depression. Sites were randomised to either COMB-R (CBT by a therapist and licensed prescriber) or ESC (standard psychotherapy and medication management). After the intervention (week 24), participants, prescribers, and therapists rated acceptability and satisfaction. We compared site-level means using Wilcoxon tests.Results: Both COMB-R (n = 69) and ESC (n = 71) participants had a mean age of 21.4 years, with 53% female, and 54% having acquired HIV perinatally. Baseline age, sex, depression levels, RNA viral load, and CD4 count were comparable between arms. The distribution of site-level mean participant acceptability was greater in COMB-R compared with ESC (p = 0.04). The distribution of site-level mean prescriber satisfaction was greater in COMB-R (p = 0.01). The was no evidence that the site-level mean therapist satisfaction did not differ between arms (p = 0.52).Discussion: Acceptability and satisfaction for participants and licensed prescribers were higher at COMB-R sites compared with standard of care, indicating that this tailored, manual-guided, collaborative, measured care intervention was less burdensome in terms of the number of visits. Patient and medication provider satisfaction rates were higher than standard of care.Conclusion: While these results support the use of CBT and MMA in treating depression among YWH, further research is required to determine generalisability.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
认知行为疗法和药物管理算法与治疗艾滋病青年抑郁症的强化标准护理相比,参与者的接受度和临床医生的满意度。
背景:国际母婴青少年艾滋病临床试验网络(IMPAACT)2002年试验的初步结果显示,与加强型标准护理(ESC)相比,认知行为疗法(CBT)和药物管理算法(MMA)(COMB-R)能显著改善艾滋病青少年(YWH)的抑郁状况。对研究参与者和临床医生的可接受性和满意度进行了考察:方法:2017 年 3 月至 2019 年 3 月期间,13 个美国研究机构招募了 12-24 岁、被诊断患有非精神病性抑郁症的青年艾滋病感染者。各研究点随机接受 COMB-R(由治疗师和执业处方医师进行的 CBT)或 ESC(标准心理治疗和药物管理)干预。干预结束后(第 24 周),参与者、处方医生和治疗师对可接受性和满意度进行评分。我们使用 Wilcoxon 检验比较了现场水平的平均值:COMB-R(n = 69)和ESC(n = 71)参与者的平均年龄为21.4岁,其中53%为女性,54%为围产期感染艾滋病病毒者。两组参与者的基线年龄、性别、抑郁程度、RNA 病毒载量和 CD4 细胞计数相当。与 ESC 相比,COMB-R 的现场水平平均参与者可接受性分布更大(p = 0.04)。与 ESC 相比,COMB-R 的现场级平均处方满意度分布更大(p = 0.01)。没有证据表明不同治疗组的治疗师平均满意度不存在差异(p = 0.52):讨论:与标准治疗相比,COMB-R 治疗点的参与者和持证处方者的可接受性和满意度更高,这表明这种量身定制、人工指导、协作式、测量式的治疗干预在就诊次数方面负担较轻。患者和药物提供者的满意度高于标准护理:尽管这些结果支持使用 CBT 和 MMA 治疗青年妇女抑郁症,但仍需进一步研究以确定其普遍性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
期刊介绍: The Journal of Child & Adolescent Mental Health publishes papers that contribute to improving the mental health of children and adolescents, especially those in Africa. Papers from all disciplines are welcome. It covers subjects such as epidemiology, mental health prevention and promotion, psychotherapy, pharmacotherapy, policy and risk behaviour. The journal contains review articles, original research (including brief reports), clinical papers in a "Clinical perspectives" section and book reviews. The Journal is published in association with the South African Association for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Allied Professions (SAACAPAP).
期刊最新文献
Response to "Developing and Validating a Scale to Measure Trauma-Informed Practices Used by Teachers in Inclusive Schools in Ghana and the United Arab Emirates". Exam anxiety in connection with life orientation in upper secondary education students. Protective and risk factors for social and emotional well-being of Indigenous children and adolescents: A rapid review. Psychosocial predictors of adolescent depression and mental health referral in an urban mobile medical unit programme. The experiences of oppression among transgender and gender expansive young people in Australia: An interpretative phenomenological study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1