A large single-center analysis of postoperative hemorrhage in more than 43,000 thyroid operations: The relevance of intraoperative systolic blood pressure, the individual surgeon, and surgeon-to-patient gender (in-)congruence.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Surgery Pub Date : 2024-11-15 DOI:10.1016/j.surg.2024.10.003
Anna Plötzl, Anna Wicher, Malwina Jarosz, Christian Passler, Stefan Haunold, Johannes Ott, Michael Hermann
{"title":"A large single-center analysis of postoperative hemorrhage in more than 43,000 thyroid operations: The relevance of intraoperative systolic blood pressure, the individual surgeon, and surgeon-to-patient gender (in-)congruence.","authors":"Anna Plötzl, Anna Wicher, Malwina Jarosz, Christian Passler, Stefan Haunold, Johannes Ott, Michael Hermann","doi":"10.1016/j.surg.2024.10.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To date, there is no reliable measure for the prevention of postoperative hemorrhage after thyroid surgery. An increase in the postoperative hemorrhage rate at our institution in 2021 prompted us to look for possible causes with a special focus on perioperative systolic blood pressure, the individual surgeon, and surgeon-to-patient gender congruence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We drew on our prospectively managed database to review 43,360 consecutive thyroid surgeries. In addition to a risk factor analysis, a subanalysis of perioperative systolic blood pressure values was performed in 26 patients with postoperative hemorrhage and 26 controls, on the basis of the hypothesis that a targeted pharmacologic increase in systolic blood pressure could reveal covert sources of bleeding.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Postoperative hemorrhage developed in 707 of 43,360 cases (1.6%). Risk factors included older age (odds ratio, 1.017), male gender (odds ratio, 1.629), Graves disease (odds ratio, 1.515), and recurrent benign thyroid disease (odds ratio, 1.693). The individual surgeon significantly influenced the rate of postoperative hemorrhage (odds ratio, up to 2.817). Surgeon-to-patient gender (in)congruence did not affect the rate of postoperative hemorrhage. The subanalysis of perioperative blood pressure revealed mostly arterial bleeding sources (17/26 [65.4%]) and significantly lower intraoperative yet greater postoperative systolic blood pressure values (100 mm Hg vs median 120 mm Hg; P = .009; and 150 mm Hg vs 130 mm Hg; P = .005; respectively) in patients who later developed postoperative hemorrhage.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although our data suggest that increasing intraoperative systolic blood pressure before wound closure may help to detect covert bleeding sources and therefore prevent postoperative hemorrhage, future studies are necessary to substantiate this finding. We recommend close collaboration with anesthesiologists as well as counteracting postoperative blood pressure increases. The individual surgeon was a major factor influencing the rate of postoperative hemorrhage. However, there were no differences between female and male surgeons operating on female or male patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":22152,"journal":{"name":"Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"108910"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2024.10.003","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To date, there is no reliable measure for the prevention of postoperative hemorrhage after thyroid surgery. An increase in the postoperative hemorrhage rate at our institution in 2021 prompted us to look for possible causes with a special focus on perioperative systolic blood pressure, the individual surgeon, and surgeon-to-patient gender congruence.

Methods: We drew on our prospectively managed database to review 43,360 consecutive thyroid surgeries. In addition to a risk factor analysis, a subanalysis of perioperative systolic blood pressure values was performed in 26 patients with postoperative hemorrhage and 26 controls, on the basis of the hypothesis that a targeted pharmacologic increase in systolic blood pressure could reveal covert sources of bleeding.

Results: Postoperative hemorrhage developed in 707 of 43,360 cases (1.6%). Risk factors included older age (odds ratio, 1.017), male gender (odds ratio, 1.629), Graves disease (odds ratio, 1.515), and recurrent benign thyroid disease (odds ratio, 1.693). The individual surgeon significantly influenced the rate of postoperative hemorrhage (odds ratio, up to 2.817). Surgeon-to-patient gender (in)congruence did not affect the rate of postoperative hemorrhage. The subanalysis of perioperative blood pressure revealed mostly arterial bleeding sources (17/26 [65.4%]) and significantly lower intraoperative yet greater postoperative systolic blood pressure values (100 mm Hg vs median 120 mm Hg; P = .009; and 150 mm Hg vs 130 mm Hg; P = .005; respectively) in patients who later developed postoperative hemorrhage.

Conclusion: Although our data suggest that increasing intraoperative systolic blood pressure before wound closure may help to detect covert bleeding sources and therefore prevent postoperative hemorrhage, future studies are necessary to substantiate this finding. We recommend close collaboration with anesthesiologists as well as counteracting postoperative blood pressure increases. The individual surgeon was a major factor influencing the rate of postoperative hemorrhage. However, there were no differences between female and male surgeons operating on female or male patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对43000多例甲状腺手术术后出血的大型单中心分析:术中收缩压、外科医生和外科医生与患者性别(不)一致的相关性。
背景:迄今为止,还没有预防甲状腺手术术后出血的可靠措施。2021 年,我院的术后出血率有所上升,这促使我们寻找可能的原因,并特别关注围手术期收缩压、外科医生个人以及外科医生与患者之间的性别一致性:我们利用前瞻性管理数据库回顾了 43360 例连续甲状腺手术。除了风险因素分析外,我们还对 26 名术后出血患者和 26 名对照组患者的围手术期收缩压值进行了子分析,其假设是有针对性的药物升高收缩压可以揭示隐蔽的出血源:结果:43360 例患者中有 707 例(1.6%)出现术后出血。风险因素包括年龄较大(几率比1.017)、男性(几率比1.629)、巴塞杜氏病(几率比1.515)和复发性甲状腺良性疾病(几率比1.693)。外科医生对术后出血率的影响很大(几率比最高为 2.817)。外科医生与患者的性别(不)一致并不影响术后出血率。对围术期血压进行的子分析显示,术后出血的患者大多来自动脉出血(17/26 [65.4%]),术中收缩压值显著较低,但术后收缩压值却显著升高(分别为 100 mm Hg vs 中位 120 mm Hg;P = .009;150 mm Hg vs 130 mm Hg;P = .005):尽管我们的数据表明,在伤口闭合前增加术中收缩压可能有助于发现隐蔽的出血源,从而预防术后出血,但未来的研究仍有必要证实这一发现。我们建议与麻醉师密切合作,并对抗术后血压升高。外科医生个人是影响术后出血率的主要因素。然而,为女性或男性患者进行手术的外科医生之间并无差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Surgery
Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
687
审稿时长
64 days
期刊介绍: For 66 years, Surgery has published practical, authoritative information about procedures, clinical advances, and major trends shaping general surgery. Each issue features original scientific contributions and clinical reports. Peer-reviewed articles cover topics in oncology, trauma, gastrointestinal, vascular, and transplantation surgery. The journal also publishes papers from the meetings of its sponsoring societies, the Society of University Surgeons, the Central Surgical Association, and the American Association of Endocrine Surgeons.
期刊最新文献
Regarding: "Does using artificial intelligence take the person out of personal statements? We can't tell". Response to letter to the editor on "Long-term lorazepam use may be associated with worse long-term outcomes among patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma". Response to letter to the editor: "Team member familiarity and team effectiveness in the operating room: The mediating effect of mutual trust and shared mental models". The importance of a vice chair in a department of surgery: A chair's perspective. Letter to the editor on "Trends and predictors of laparoscopic compared with open emergent inguinal hernia repair".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1