Manipulating levels of uncertainty in a decision-making task for obsessive compulsive disorder.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-15 DOI:10.47626/1516-4446-2023-3432
Uma Maheswari Ganesh, Lavanya Sharma, Himani Kashyap, Shyam Sundar Arumugham, Janardhan Reddy
{"title":"Manipulating levels of uncertainty in a decision-making task for obsessive compulsive disorder.","authors":"Uma Maheswari Ganesh, Lavanya Sharma, Himani Kashyap, Shyam Sundar Arumugham, Janardhan Reddy","doi":"10.47626/1516-4446-2023-3432","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We investigated whether manipulating levels of uncertainty would influence performance in a decision-making task in people with obsessive-compulsive disorder.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This case-control study compares Beads Task (measuring reflection/decisional impulsivity) performance and trait impulsivity (Short Urgency-Premeditation-Perseverance-Sensation Seeking-Positive Urgency [UPPS-P] Impulsive Behavior Scale) in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (n = 65) and non-clinical controls (n = 45). Differences between groups were assessed with the Mann Whitney U test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The obsessive-compulsive disorder group had significantly fewer draws to decision (U = 1,845, p = 0.019) and less subjective decision-certainty (U = 1,518, p = 0.00) in the low uncertainty (85:15) condition, and higher negative urgency scores (U = 2,163, p ≤ 0.001) and lower sensation-seeking scores (U = 907.5, p = 0.001) in UPPS-P. However, differences in Beads Task performance did not survive correction for multiple comparisons.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder engage in more impulsive decision-making in the lower uncertainty condition than healthy controls, despite low subjective certainty of the decision. They also had higher scores for the trait impulsivity factor of negative urgency. Future studies should explore the contribution of trait impulsivity, as well as symptom severity, anxiety, and decision-certainty, to impulsivity in obsessive-compulsive disorder.</p>","PeriodicalId":21244,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria","volume":" ","pages":"e20233432"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11773319/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47626/1516-4446-2023-3432","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: We investigated whether manipulating levels of uncertainty would influence performance in a decision-making task in people with obsessive-compulsive disorder.

Methods: This case-control study compares Beads Task (measuring reflection/decisional impulsivity) performance and trait impulsivity (Short Urgency-Premeditation-Perseverance-Sensation Seeking-Positive Urgency [UPPS-P] Impulsive Behavior Scale) in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (n = 65) and non-clinical controls (n = 45). Differences between groups were assessed with the Mann Whitney U test.

Results: The obsessive-compulsive disorder group had significantly fewer draws to decision (U = 1,845, p = 0.019) and less subjective decision-certainty (U = 1,518, p = 0.00) in the low uncertainty (85:15) condition, and higher negative urgency scores (U = 2,163, p ≤ 0.001) and lower sensation-seeking scores (U = 907.5, p = 0.001) in UPPS-P. However, differences in Beads Task performance did not survive correction for multiple comparisons.

Conclusion: Patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder engage in more impulsive decision-making in the lower uncertainty condition than healthy controls, despite low subjective certainty of the decision. They also had higher scores for the trait impulsivity factor of negative urgency. Future studies should explore the contribution of trait impulsivity, as well as symptom severity, anxiety, and decision-certainty, to impulsivity in obsessive-compulsive disorder.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在强迫症决策任务中操纵不确定性水平。
研究目的本研究旨在探讨操纵不确定性水平是否会影响强迫症(OCD)患者在决策任务中的表现:这项病例对照研究比较了强迫症患者(n=65)和非临床对照组(n=45)在珠子任务(测量反思/决策冲动性)中的表现和特质冲动性(简短急迫性-慎重性-毅力-感觉寻求-积极急迫性(UPPS-P))。采用曼-惠特尼U检验评估组间差异:结果:在低不确定性(85:15)条件下,强迫症组的决策引力(U=1845,p=.019)和主观决策确定性(U=1518,p=0.00)明显较低,负紧迫性得分较高(U=2163,p=结论:与健康对照组相比,强迫症患者在低不确定性条件下会做出冲动性决策,尽管他们主观上对决策的确定性很低。他们在特质冲动因子消极紧迫性上的得分也有所增加。未来的研究可能会探讨特质冲动性之间的关系,以及症状严重程度、焦虑和决策确定性对强迫症患者冲动性的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria
Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
83
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria (RBP) is the official organ of the Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria (ABP - Brazilian Association of Psychiatry). The Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry is a bimonthly publication that aims to publish original manuscripts in all areas of psychiatry, including public health, clinical epidemiology, basic science, and mental health problems. The journal is fully open access, and there are no article processing or publication fees. Articles must be written in English.
期刊最新文献
Candidate Genes Related to Spiritual Mediumship: A Whole Exome Sequencing Analysis of Highly Gifted Mediums. Patterns of drug combinations used by men who have sex with men in Brazil. Predictive Factors of Alcohol Initiation among Brazilian Adolescents: Assessing the Role of Attitudes, Decision-Making, Communication, and Resistance Skills. A call for greater diversity and representativity within countries in psychiatric research: Lessons and challenges from a systematic review of schizophrenia research in Brazil. Cognitive changes in post-stroke depression patients undergoing treatment with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): an exploratory, ancillary analysis of a randomized, sham-controlled clinical trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1