Prophylactic dressings for preventing sacral pressure injuries in adult intensive care unit patients: A randomised feasibility trial.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Australian Critical Care Pub Date : 2024-11-15 DOI:10.1016/j.aucc.2024.101133
Sharon Latimer, Wendy Chaboyer, Rachel M Walker, Lukman Thalib, Jodie L Deakin, Brigid M Gillespie
{"title":"Prophylactic dressings for preventing sacral pressure injuries in adult intensive care unit patients: A randomised feasibility trial.","authors":"Sharon Latimer, Wendy Chaboyer, Rachel M Walker, Lukman Thalib, Jodie L Deakin, Brigid M Gillespie","doi":"10.1016/j.aucc.2024.101133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prophylactic dressings are used to prevent sacral pressure injuries (PIs) in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Bedside clinicians are responsible for selecting these dressings despite the lack of comparative evidence.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of this study was to assess the feasibility of undertaking a larger multisite comparative effectiveness trial of two prophylactic sacral dressings in adult ICU patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a two-arm pilot randomised feasibility trial design, we randomly allocated adult ICU patients to the Mepilex® Border Sacrum dressing or Allevyn™ Life Sacrum dressing plus usual PI prevention care. Our primary study outcomes were study eligibility, recruitment, retention, intervention fidelity, and missing data criteria. Participants were followed up for up to 14 days or a study endpoint: new sacral PI, ICU discharge, death, prone positioning, urine/faecal incontinence, or withdrawal. Daily clinical data were collected including a deidentified sacral photograph, sacral visual skin assessment, dressing failure rates (rolled edges, adhesion loss), and dressing-related harm (e.g., blisters). The blinded outcome assessor used these data to determine the presence of a new sacral PI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From January to September 2023, 1069 ICU patients were screened; 77 (7.2%) were eligible, and 68 (88.3%) were recruited. Half of our feasibility criteria were met. One participant (1.5%) developed a sacral PI. Throughout the study, half (n = 54; 49.5%) of the dressing changes were due to dressing failure (rolled edges: n = 43; 79.5%, adhesion failure: n = 11; 20.5%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Several prophylactic sacral dressings are available; however, comparative effective evidence between brands relative to performance, benefits, and harms is lacking. Following minor study criteria modifications, we found that a larger multisite comparative trial is feasible. Sacral prophylactic dressing failure and dressing-related harms are care quality and patient safety issues requiring further investigation regarding performance, harm, and costs.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trial Registration number: ACTRN12622000793718 and World Health Organization Universal Trial number: U1111-1278-6055.</p>","PeriodicalId":51239,"journal":{"name":"Australian Critical Care","volume":" ","pages":"101133"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aucc.2024.101133","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Prophylactic dressings are used to prevent sacral pressure injuries (PIs) in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Bedside clinicians are responsible for selecting these dressings despite the lack of comparative evidence.

Objectives: The objective of this study was to assess the feasibility of undertaking a larger multisite comparative effectiveness trial of two prophylactic sacral dressings in adult ICU patients.

Methods: Using a two-arm pilot randomised feasibility trial design, we randomly allocated adult ICU patients to the Mepilex® Border Sacrum dressing or Allevyn™ Life Sacrum dressing plus usual PI prevention care. Our primary study outcomes were study eligibility, recruitment, retention, intervention fidelity, and missing data criteria. Participants were followed up for up to 14 days or a study endpoint: new sacral PI, ICU discharge, death, prone positioning, urine/faecal incontinence, or withdrawal. Daily clinical data were collected including a deidentified sacral photograph, sacral visual skin assessment, dressing failure rates (rolled edges, adhesion loss), and dressing-related harm (e.g., blisters). The blinded outcome assessor used these data to determine the presence of a new sacral PI.

Results: From January to September 2023, 1069 ICU patients were screened; 77 (7.2%) were eligible, and 68 (88.3%) were recruited. Half of our feasibility criteria were met. One participant (1.5%) developed a sacral PI. Throughout the study, half (n = 54; 49.5%) of the dressing changes were due to dressing failure (rolled edges: n = 43; 79.5%, adhesion failure: n = 11; 20.5%).

Conclusions: Several prophylactic sacral dressings are available; however, comparative effective evidence between brands relative to performance, benefits, and harms is lacking. Following minor study criteria modifications, we found that a larger multisite comparative trial is feasible. Sacral prophylactic dressing failure and dressing-related harms are care quality and patient safety issues requiring further investigation regarding performance, harm, and costs.

Trial registration: Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trial Registration number: ACTRN12622000793718 and World Health Organization Universal Trial number: U1111-1278-6055.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预防性敷料用于预防成人重症监护病房患者的骶骨压力损伤:随机可行性试验。
背景:预防性敷料用于预防重症监护病房(ICU)患者的骶骨压力损伤(PIs)。尽管缺乏比较证据,床边临床医生仍负责选择这些敷料:本研究的目的是评估在成人 ICU 患者中对两种预防性骶骨敷料进行更大规模的多地点比较效果试验的可行性:我们采用双臂试验性随机可行性试验设计,将成年 ICU 患者随机分配到 Mepilex® Border Sacrum 敷料或 Allevyn™ Life Sacrum 敷料以及常规 PI 预防护理中。我们的主要研究结果包括研究资格、招募、保留、干预忠实性和数据缺失标准。我们对参与者进行了长达 14 天的随访或研究终点随访:新的骶骨 PI、ICU 出院、死亡、俯卧位、大小便失禁或退出。每天收集的临床数据包括一张去身份的骶骨照片、骶骨可视皮肤评估、敷料失败率(卷边、粘连脱落)和敷料相关伤害(如水泡)。盲法结果评估员利用这些数据来确定是否存在新的骶部 PI:从 2023 年 1 月到 9 月,共筛选了 1069 名重症监护室患者;77 人(7.2%)符合条件,68 人(88.3%)被招募。其中一半符合可行性标准。一名参与者(1.5%)出现了骶尾部 PI。在整个研究过程中,一半(n = 54;49.5%)的敷料更换是由于敷料失效(卷边:n = 43;79.5%,粘连失效:n = 11;20.5%):结论:目前有多种预防性骶骨敷料可供选择,但缺乏不同品牌之间在性能、益处和危害方面的有效比较证据。在对研究标准稍作修改后,我们发现一项更大规模的多地点比较试验是可行的。骶骨预防性敷料失效和与敷料相关的伤害是护理质量和患者安全问题,需要进一步调查其性能、伤害和成本:试验注册:澳大利亚和新西兰临床试验注册号:试验注册:澳大利亚和新西兰临床试验注册号:ACTRN12622000793718,世界卫生组织通用试验号:u1111-1278-6055:U1111-1278-6055.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Critical Care
Australian Critical Care NURSING-NURSING
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
148
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australian Critical Care is the official journal of the Australian College of Critical Care Nurses (ACCCN). It is a bi-monthly peer-reviewed journal, providing clinically relevant research, reviews and articles of interest to the critical care community. Australian Critical Care publishes peer-reviewed scholarly papers that report research findings, research-based reviews, discussion papers and commentaries which are of interest to an international readership of critical care practitioners, educators, administrators and researchers. Interprofessional articles are welcomed.
期刊最新文献
Expression of Concern: Comparison of different eye care methods to prevent dry eye and corneal ulcer in older critically ill patients: A randomised controlled trial. A systematic review of the comparative effects of sound and music interventions for intensive care unit patients' outcomes. An interprofessional multicomponent intervention to improve end-of-life care in intensive care: A before-and-after study. Editorial draft Volume 38, Issue 1, 2025. The clinical utility of shock index in hospitalised patients requiring activation of the rapid response team.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1