A systematic review of the comparative effects of sound and music interventions for intensive care unit patients' outcomes.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Australian Critical Care Pub Date : 2024-12-27 DOI:10.1016/j.aucc.2024.101148
Elizabeth Papathanassoglou, Usha Pant, Shaista Meghani, Neelam Saleem Punjani, Yuluan Wang, Tiffany Brulotte, Krooti Vyas, Liz Dennett, Lucinda Johnston, Demetrios James Kutsogiannis, Stephanie Plamondon, Michael Frishkopf
{"title":"A systematic review of the comparative effects of sound and music interventions for intensive care unit patients' outcomes.","authors":"Elizabeth Papathanassoglou, Usha Pant, Shaista Meghani, Neelam Saleem Punjani, Yuluan Wang, Tiffany Brulotte, Krooti Vyas, Liz Dennett, Lucinda Johnston, Demetrios James Kutsogiannis, Stephanie Plamondon, Michael Frishkopf","doi":"10.1016/j.aucc.2024.101148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite syntheses of evidence showing efficacy of music intervention for improving psychological and physiological outcomes in critically ill patients, interventions that include nonmusic sounds have not been addressed in reviews of evidence. It is unclear if nonmusic sounds in the intensive care unit (ICU) can confer benefits similar to those of music.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to summarise and contrast available evidence on the effect of music and nonmusic sound interventions for the physiological and psychological outcomes of ICU patients based on the results of randomised controlled trials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review was directed by a protocol based on the Methodological Expectations of Cochrane Intervention Reviews. Quality of studies was assessed with the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool. Searches were performed in the following databases: MEDLINE, Embase, APA PsycInfo, CINAHL Plus with Full Text, Academic Search Complete, RILM Abstracts of Music Literature, Web of Science, and Scopus.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 59 articles meeting the inclusion criteria, 37 involving music and 22 involving nonmusic sound interventions, with one study comparing music and sound. The identified studies were representative of a general ICU population, regardless of patients' ability to communicate. Our review demonstrated that both slow-tempo music and sound interventions can significantly (i) decrease pain; (ii) improve sleep; (iii) regulate cortisol levels; (iv) reduce sedative and analgesic need; and (v) reduce stress/anxiety and improve relaxation when compared with standard care and noise reduction. Moreover, compared to nonmusic sound interventions, there is more evidence that music interventions have an effect on stress biomarkers, vital signs, and haemodynamic measures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results raise the possibility that different auditory interventions may have varying degrees of effectiveness for specific patient outcomes in the ICU. More investigation is needed to clarify if nonmusic sound interventions may be equivalent or not to music interventions for the management of discrete symptoms in ICU patients.</p><p><strong>Registration of reviews: </strong>The protocol was registered on Open Science Framework in November 6 2023 (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/45F6E).</p>","PeriodicalId":51239,"journal":{"name":"Australian Critical Care","volume":" ","pages":"101148"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aucc.2024.101148","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite syntheses of evidence showing efficacy of music intervention for improving psychological and physiological outcomes in critically ill patients, interventions that include nonmusic sounds have not been addressed in reviews of evidence. It is unclear if nonmusic sounds in the intensive care unit (ICU) can confer benefits similar to those of music.

Objective: The aim of this study was to summarise and contrast available evidence on the effect of music and nonmusic sound interventions for the physiological and psychological outcomes of ICU patients based on the results of randomised controlled trials.

Methods: This systematic review was directed by a protocol based on the Methodological Expectations of Cochrane Intervention Reviews. Quality of studies was assessed with the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool. Searches were performed in the following databases: MEDLINE, Embase, APA PsycInfo, CINAHL Plus with Full Text, Academic Search Complete, RILM Abstracts of Music Literature, Web of Science, and Scopus.

Results: We identified 59 articles meeting the inclusion criteria, 37 involving music and 22 involving nonmusic sound interventions, with one study comparing music and sound. The identified studies were representative of a general ICU population, regardless of patients' ability to communicate. Our review demonstrated that both slow-tempo music and sound interventions can significantly (i) decrease pain; (ii) improve sleep; (iii) regulate cortisol levels; (iv) reduce sedative and analgesic need; and (v) reduce stress/anxiety and improve relaxation when compared with standard care and noise reduction. Moreover, compared to nonmusic sound interventions, there is more evidence that music interventions have an effect on stress biomarkers, vital signs, and haemodynamic measures.

Conclusion: These results raise the possibility that different auditory interventions may have varying degrees of effectiveness for specific patient outcomes in the ICU. More investigation is needed to clarify if nonmusic sound interventions may be equivalent or not to music interventions for the management of discrete symptoms in ICU patients.

Registration of reviews: The protocol was registered on Open Science Framework in November 6 2023 (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/45F6E).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Critical Care
Australian Critical Care NURSING-NURSING
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
148
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australian Critical Care is the official journal of the Australian College of Critical Care Nurses (ACCCN). It is a bi-monthly peer-reviewed journal, providing clinically relevant research, reviews and articles of interest to the critical care community. Australian Critical Care publishes peer-reviewed scholarly papers that report research findings, research-based reviews, discussion papers and commentaries which are of interest to an international readership of critical care practitioners, educators, administrators and researchers. Interprofessional articles are welcomed.
期刊最新文献
Expression of Concern: Comparison of different eye care methods to prevent dry eye and corneal ulcer in older critically ill patients: A randomised controlled trial. A systematic review of the comparative effects of sound and music interventions for intensive care unit patients' outcomes. An interprofessional multicomponent intervention to improve end-of-life care in intensive care: A before-and-after study. Editorial draft Volume 38, Issue 1, 2025. The clinical utility of shock index in hospitalised patients requiring activation of the rapid response team.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1