Interhospital transfers in elderly trauma patients.

Malte Andreas Groth-Rasmussen Koch, Tobias Arleth, Oscar Rosenkrantz, Søren Steemann Rudolph, Jacob Steinmetz
{"title":"Interhospital transfers in elderly trauma patients.","authors":"Malte Andreas Groth-Rasmussen Koch, Tobias Arleth, Oscar Rosenkrantz, Søren Steemann Rudolph, Jacob Steinmetz","doi":"10.1016/j.injury.2024.111998","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The elderly population is growing worldwide and is more likely to die from injuries that younger patients would likely survive. Furthermore, elderly trauma patients are often subjected to triage decisions that admit them to lower-level facilities. These patients may require interhospital transfer to a major trauma center for definitive care. The aim of this study was to investigate the time interval from arrival at the primary hospital to arrival at the trauma center among elderly trauma patients (≥65 years) as compared to younger, adult patients (18-64 years). We hypothesized that elderly trauma patients would endure a longer time interval.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective quality assurance study based on patient data in our trauma registry at the Trauma Center of Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet in Denmark. Data were extracted in the period between 2018 and 2023. We included all adult trauma patients (≥18 years) who underwent interhospital transfer to the trauma center. The primary outcome was minutes from arrival at the primary hospital to arrival at the trauma center. A quality standard of at least 90 % of patients arriving at the trauma center in <240 min after arrival at the primary hospital, was chosen.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 565 patients were included and divided into an elderly cohort (n = 184) and a younger cohort (n = 381). The elderly cohort had a significantly longer median delay (247 vs. 197 min; estimated difference 50 min, 95 % confidence interval (CI) [28, 71]; p < 0.001). The elderly cohort met the quality standard less than the younger cohort (49 % vs. 68 %). The elderly cohort had a significantly higher injury severity score (17 [IQR 13, 25] vs. 16 [IQR 9, 21]; p < 0.001), and we found a significant difference in 30-day mortality, which was supported by an adjusted odds ratio of 6.35 (95 % CI [2.84, 15.7]; p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In conclusion, elderly trauma patients experienced significantly longer median delays from arrival at the primary hospital to arrival at the trauma center compared to younger adult trauma patients. The elderly trauma patients met the quality standard for transfer time at a lower rate than the younger group.</p>","PeriodicalId":94042,"journal":{"name":"Injury","volume":" ","pages":"111998"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Injury","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2024.111998","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The elderly population is growing worldwide and is more likely to die from injuries that younger patients would likely survive. Furthermore, elderly trauma patients are often subjected to triage decisions that admit them to lower-level facilities. These patients may require interhospital transfer to a major trauma center for definitive care. The aim of this study was to investigate the time interval from arrival at the primary hospital to arrival at the trauma center among elderly trauma patients (≥65 years) as compared to younger, adult patients (18-64 years). We hypothesized that elderly trauma patients would endure a longer time interval.

Methods: This was a retrospective quality assurance study based on patient data in our trauma registry at the Trauma Center of Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet in Denmark. Data were extracted in the period between 2018 and 2023. We included all adult trauma patients (≥18 years) who underwent interhospital transfer to the trauma center. The primary outcome was minutes from arrival at the primary hospital to arrival at the trauma center. A quality standard of at least 90 % of patients arriving at the trauma center in <240 min after arrival at the primary hospital, was chosen.

Results: In total, 565 patients were included and divided into an elderly cohort (n = 184) and a younger cohort (n = 381). The elderly cohort had a significantly longer median delay (247 vs. 197 min; estimated difference 50 min, 95 % confidence interval (CI) [28, 71]; p < 0.001). The elderly cohort met the quality standard less than the younger cohort (49 % vs. 68 %). The elderly cohort had a significantly higher injury severity score (17 [IQR 13, 25] vs. 16 [IQR 9, 21]; p < 0.001), and we found a significant difference in 30-day mortality, which was supported by an adjusted odds ratio of 6.35 (95 % CI [2.84, 15.7]; p < 0.001).

Conclusions: In conclusion, elderly trauma patients experienced significantly longer median delays from arrival at the primary hospital to arrival at the trauma center compared to younger adult trauma patients. The elderly trauma patients met the quality standard for transfer time at a lower rate than the younger group.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
老年创伤患者的院间转运。
导言:全世界的老年人口正在不断增长,他们更有可能死于年轻患者可能幸存的伤害。此外,老年创伤患者通常会被分流到级别较低的医疗机构。这些患者可能需要在医院间转送至大型创伤中心接受最终治疗。本研究旨在调查老年创伤患者(≥65 岁)与年轻的成年患者(18-64 岁)相比,从到达初级医院到到达创伤中心的时间间隔。我们假设,老年创伤患者将承受更长的时间间隔:这是一项回顾性质量保证研究,基于丹麦哥本哈根大学附属医院(Rigshospitalet)创伤中心创伤登记处的患者数据。数据提取时间为 2018 年至 2023 年。我们纳入了所有经过院间转运到创伤中心的成年创伤患者(≥18 岁)。主要结果是从抵达初级医院到抵达创伤中心的时间。结果显示,至少有 90% 的患者抵达创伤中心,这是一项质量标准:共纳入 565 名患者,分为老年组群(184 人)和年轻组群(381 人)。老年组的中位延迟时间明显更长(247 分钟对 197 分钟;估计差异为 50 分钟,95% 置信区间 (CI) [28, 71];P < 0.001)。老年组达到质量标准的比例低于年轻组(49% 对 68%)。老年组的损伤严重程度评分明显更高(17 [IQR 13, 25] vs. 16 [IQR 9, 21]; p < 0.001),我们发现老年组在 30 天死亡率方面存在显著差异,调整后的几率比为 6.35 (95 % CI [2.84, 15.7]; p < 0.001):总之,与年轻的成年创伤患者相比,老年创伤患者从抵达初级医院到抵达创伤中心的中位延迟时间要长得多。老年创伤患者在转运时间方面达到质量标准的比例低于年轻组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Commentary on "early surgical care of the anticoagulated hip fracture patient within 24 hours". Whether or not practicing early weight-bearing makes the differences in the risk of reoperation after cephalomedullary nailing. Biodegradable and metallic tension-band fixation for paediatric lateral condyle fracture of the elbow: Correspondence. Commentary on "Fixation of proximal tibial fractures with intramedullary nail and immediate weightbearing: A beneficial alternative". Interhospital transfers in elderly trauma patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1