Effects of major trauma care organisation on mortality in a European level 1 trauma centre: A retrospective analysis of 2016-2023

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured Pub Date : 2024-11-13 DOI:10.1016/j.injury.2024.112022
Philip Verdonck , Matthew Peters , Tom Stroobants , Johan Gillebeert , Eva Janssens , Sebastian Schnaubelt , Suresh Krishan Yogeswaran , Sabine Lemoyne , Anouk Wittock , Lore Sypré , Dominique Robert , Philippe G Jorens , Dennis Brouwers , Stijn Slootmans , Koenraad Monsieurs
{"title":"Effects of major trauma care organisation on mortality in a European level 1 trauma centre: A retrospective analysis of 2016-2023","authors":"Philip Verdonck ,&nbsp;Matthew Peters ,&nbsp;Tom Stroobants ,&nbsp;Johan Gillebeert ,&nbsp;Eva Janssens ,&nbsp;Sebastian Schnaubelt ,&nbsp;Suresh Krishan Yogeswaran ,&nbsp;Sabine Lemoyne ,&nbsp;Anouk Wittock ,&nbsp;Lore Sypré ,&nbsp;Dominique Robert ,&nbsp;Philippe G Jorens ,&nbsp;Dennis Brouwers ,&nbsp;Stijn Slootmans ,&nbsp;Koenraad Monsieurs","doi":"10.1016/j.injury.2024.112022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The centralisation of care for trauma patients in trauma centres, alongside the creation of inclusive trauma networks, has proven to reduce mortality. In Europe, such structured trauma programs and trauma networks are in development.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To describe the aetiology and evolution of in-hospital mortality in a developing European level 1 trauma centre, to determine the early effect of trauma care reorganisation on mortality and to identify the areas for future investments in trauma care.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>This retrospective analysis included the calculation of the standardised mortality ratio (SMR), the time to in-hospital death and the cause of in-hospital death of all primary major trauma admissions to the Antwerp University Hospital from 2016 to 2023.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 1470 patients was included with a crude mortality of 16.4 %, a median Revised Injury Severity Classification II (RISC II) adjusted mortality of 1.47 %, and a SMR of 1.12. A limitation of care directive was registered for 18.1 % of the patients. The causes of in-hospital death were traumatic brain injury (TBI) in 60 %, haemorrhagic shock in 15 %, organ failure in 10 %, miscellaneous in 14 % and unknown in 1 %. Sixty percent died in the first 48 h of hospital admission (mainly due to TBI and haemorrhagic shock) and 27 % died after more than seven days (mainly due to organ failure and TBI). In 24 % of the deceased patients with severe TBI, a non-TBI related cause of death was found. Overall, the SMR showed a nonsignificant decreasing trend, with a significant decrease of the SMR in the highest risk group (RISCII &gt; 75 %) and a nonsignificant increase in the lowest risk group (RISC II &lt;15 %).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The standardised mortality ratio declined over a period of 8 years, even though the SMR increased nonsignificantly in the lowest risk-adjusted mortality group. Future analysis of this subgroup could clarify whether this trend is due to an increase of limitation of care directives and if these deaths could have been prevented with improved trauma care. There might be opportunities to increase the survival of patients with severe TBI who have a non-TBI cause of death.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54978,"journal":{"name":"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured","volume":"55 12","pages":"Article 112022"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020138324007666","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The centralisation of care for trauma patients in trauma centres, alongside the creation of inclusive trauma networks, has proven to reduce mortality. In Europe, such structured trauma programs and trauma networks are in development.

Objective

To describe the aetiology and evolution of in-hospital mortality in a developing European level 1 trauma centre, to determine the early effect of trauma care reorganisation on mortality and to identify the areas for future investments in trauma care.

Materials and methods

This retrospective analysis included the calculation of the standardised mortality ratio (SMR), the time to in-hospital death and the cause of in-hospital death of all primary major trauma admissions to the Antwerp University Hospital from 2016 to 2023.

Results

A total of 1470 patients was included with a crude mortality of 16.4 %, a median Revised Injury Severity Classification II (RISC II) adjusted mortality of 1.47 %, and a SMR of 1.12. A limitation of care directive was registered for 18.1 % of the patients. The causes of in-hospital death were traumatic brain injury (TBI) in 60 %, haemorrhagic shock in 15 %, organ failure in 10 %, miscellaneous in 14 % and unknown in 1 %. Sixty percent died in the first 48 h of hospital admission (mainly due to TBI and haemorrhagic shock) and 27 % died after more than seven days (mainly due to organ failure and TBI). In 24 % of the deceased patients with severe TBI, a non-TBI related cause of death was found. Overall, the SMR showed a nonsignificant decreasing trend, with a significant decrease of the SMR in the highest risk group (RISCII > 75 %) and a nonsignificant increase in the lowest risk group (RISC II <15 %).

Conclusion

The standardised mortality ratio declined over a period of 8 years, even though the SMR increased nonsignificantly in the lowest risk-adjusted mortality group. Future analysis of this subgroup could clarify whether this trend is due to an increase of limitation of care directives and if these deaths could have been prevented with improved trauma care. There might be opportunities to increase the survival of patients with severe TBI who have a non-TBI cause of death.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧洲一级创伤中心重大创伤救治组织对死亡率的影响:2016-2023年回顾性分析。
介绍:事实证明,将重创病人集中到重创中心进行治疗,同时建立包容性的重创网络,可以降低死亡率。在欧洲,这种结构化的创伤项目和创伤网络正在发展之中:描述一个发展中的欧洲一级重创中心的院内死亡率的病因和演变,确定重创护理重组对死亡率的早期影响,并确定未来重创护理投资的领域:这项回顾性分析包括计算2016年至2023年安特卫普大学医院收治的所有初级重大创伤患者的标准化死亡率(SMR)、院内死亡时间和院内死亡原因:共纳入1470名患者,粗死亡率为16.4%,中位数修正伤害严重程度分类II(RISC II)调整死亡率为1.47%,SMR为1.12。18.1%的患者登记了限制护理指令。院内死亡原因为:脑外伤(TBI)占60%,失血性休克占15%,器官衰竭占10%,其他占14%,未知占1%。60%的患者在入院后48小时内死亡(主要是由于创伤性脑损伤和失血性休克),27%的患者在超过7天后死亡(主要是由于器官衰竭和创伤性脑损伤)。在 24% 的严重创伤性脑损伤死亡患者中,发现了与创伤性脑损伤无关的死因。总体而言,标准死亡率呈非显著下降趋势,最高风险组(RISCII > 75 %)的标准死亡率显著下降,最低风险组(RISC II 结论)的标准死亡率则无显著上升:在 8 年的时间里,标准化死亡率有所下降,尽管在风险调整后死亡率最低的组别中,SMR 的上升并不明显。今后对该亚组的分析可以明确这一趋势是否是由于护理限制指令的增加造成的,以及是否可以通过改善创伤护理来避免这些死亡。对于死因与创伤无关的严重创伤性脑损伤患者,或许有机会提高其存活率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
8.00%
发文量
699
审稿时长
96 days
期刊介绍: Injury was founded in 1969 and is an international journal dealing with all aspects of trauma care and accident surgery. Our primary aim is to facilitate the exchange of ideas, techniques and information among all members of the trauma team.
期刊最新文献
Effects of major trauma care organisation on mortality in a European level 1 trauma centre: A retrospective analysis of 2016-2023 Cost-effectiveness and budget impact of cement augmentation for the fixation of unstable trochanteric fractures from a European perspective Avoiding “a piece of paper on the wall that everyone ignores”: A qualitative study on the barriers for implementing open fracture guidelines A finite element analysis of the trapezoidal plate. How to get a stable fixation at different fracture lines? “Utility of social vulnerability index in trauma: A systematic review”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1