Nguyen Van Duc Long, Dong Young Lee, Choongyong Kwag, Young Mok Lee, Sung Won Lee, David Lewis, Evgeny Rebrov, Volker Hessel, Moonyong Lee
{"title":"Removal of marine NOx, SOx, and CO2 from flue gas: Simulation and experiment on a pilot plant","authors":"Nguyen Van Duc Long, Dong Young Lee, Choongyong Kwag, Young Mok Lee, Sung Won Lee, David Lewis, Evgeny Rebrov, Volker Hessel, Moonyong Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.seppur.2024.130558","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Flue gas treatment typically involves multiple scrubbing and absorbing stages, which increases capital and operating costs and requires large spaces; this process is particularly challenging for space-constrained ships. To address this issue, a highly practical, compact, efficient, intensified marine process for a diesel engine that simultaneously removes NO<sub>x</sub> and SO<sub>x</sub> to meet the current IMO MARPOL VI 14 regulations for SECAs and IMO MARPOL Annex VI Tier III for NECAs and captures CO<sub>2</sub> before compressing and liquefying it to comply with new IMO regulations. The proposed method uses NO ozonation and wet scrubbing with NaOH in a square marine scrubber, which reduces volume, weight, pressure drop, and associated costs. Mixed solvents, multiple feeds, rich solvent recycling, and heat integration were used to intensify CO<sub>2</sub> removal. Experimental results with a pilot scrubber on marine diesel engine flue gas agreed well with the results of Aspen Plus V12 simulations. Moreover, SO<sub>2</sub> absorption efficiency was > 97.0 %, NO<sub>2</sub> removal efficiency was > 92.2 %, and CO<sub>2</sub> removal efficiency increased from 87.4 % to 94.5 %. The stripper reboiler duty reduced to 176 kW (82.2 % savings) and the total operating costs (TOC) and total annual costs (TAC) reduced by 56.3 % and 13.9 %, respectively, compared with those of the base case.","PeriodicalId":427,"journal":{"name":"Separation and Purification Technology","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Separation and Purification Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2024.130558","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Flue gas treatment typically involves multiple scrubbing and absorbing stages, which increases capital and operating costs and requires large spaces; this process is particularly challenging for space-constrained ships. To address this issue, a highly practical, compact, efficient, intensified marine process for a diesel engine that simultaneously removes NOx and SOx to meet the current IMO MARPOL VI 14 regulations for SECAs and IMO MARPOL Annex VI Tier III for NECAs and captures CO2 before compressing and liquefying it to comply with new IMO regulations. The proposed method uses NO ozonation and wet scrubbing with NaOH in a square marine scrubber, which reduces volume, weight, pressure drop, and associated costs. Mixed solvents, multiple feeds, rich solvent recycling, and heat integration were used to intensify CO2 removal. Experimental results with a pilot scrubber on marine diesel engine flue gas agreed well with the results of Aspen Plus V12 simulations. Moreover, SO2 absorption efficiency was > 97.0 %, NO2 removal efficiency was > 92.2 %, and CO2 removal efficiency increased from 87.4 % to 94.5 %. The stripper reboiler duty reduced to 176 kW (82.2 % savings) and the total operating costs (TOC) and total annual costs (TAC) reduced by 56.3 % and 13.9 %, respectively, compared with those of the base case.
期刊介绍:
Separation and Purification Technology is a premier journal committed to sharing innovative methods for separation and purification in chemical and environmental engineering, encompassing both homogeneous solutions and heterogeneous mixtures. Our scope includes the separation and/or purification of liquids, vapors, and gases, as well as carbon capture and separation techniques. However, it's important to note that methods solely intended for analytical purposes are not within the scope of the journal. Additionally, disciplines such as soil science, polymer science, and metallurgy fall outside the purview of Separation and Purification Technology. Join us in advancing the field of separation and purification methods for sustainable solutions in chemical and environmental engineering.